Humans are naturally never satisfied with what they have and strive for the highest amount of authority. People all crave the right to be heard even though being given too much authority can lead to anarchy and belligerent problems. In the book, Lord of the Flies the two main characters Jack and Ralph, work together to liberate themselves and other boys off of an island, while attempting to not cause a mutiny. Throughout this book, there are multiple messages about leadership that are expressed through motif. Being a leader not only gives the person a title of respect but is also a role that contains a lot of responsibility. In LOTF, both Jack and Ralph fight to be that respected person within the group which by the end led to enmity …show more content…
Humans not only rely on others’ opinions a great deal but they are also controlled by their ID, Superego, and Ego, also known as the Freudian Psychology. Jack is controlled by his ID multiple times in this book because he only would do what he wanted and did not acknowledge Ralph’s opinions. “There was a ship. Out there. You said you’d keep the fire going and you let it out! He took a step toward Jack, who turned and faced him” (Golding 70). The ID in the Freudian Psychology is another factor that goes into why people cannot be trusted to govern themselves. People’s IDs are showing what their desires and impulses are which is why Jack did not keep the fire going. He knew that Ralph instructed him to keep the fire going but instead his ID told him to go hunting and believed that the fire would stay safe even without keeping guard. As mentioned in the previous quote, similar things can be found in this quote since this quote also caused anarchy between Ralph and Jack which eventually caused mistrust between them. From the beginning to the end of this book, there is a motif about leadership. Leadership is a convoluted topic within this book because of how not everybody was completely happy with the leadership role choices. There was never a set leader during the time the boys were on the island which generated a disorganized foundation for the other boys to follow. At times,
German journalist John Zenger once stated, “Great leaders are not defined by the absence of weakness, but rather by the presence of clear strengths”. When one is forced into a situation where a leader is necessary, a person that displays the fundamental attributes will successfully guide the society. Throughout the novel Lord of the Flies, the boys on the island represent various aspects of leadership, characterized by differing strengths. However, the protagonist’s, Ralph, leadership undoubtedly triumph over the other boys because his attributes allow him to be a powerful leader on the island. Throughout William Golding’s novel, he clearly depicts Ralph as an effective leader through his desire for the survival of all of the boys, his adamant
Power is key part of the book “Lord of the Flies”, the topic of power in the book can relate to a quote by Martin Luther King, Jr., “I am not interested in power for power’s sake, but I’m interested in power that is moral, that is right, and that is good.” In the book there are two characters that can somewhat relate to this quote, one character affirms the quote and one refutes it. Ralph is the character that affirms the quote he uses his power to help the community not use his power to command the community. Some actions that Ralph takes that shows are “If we have a signal going they'll come and take us off. And another thing. We ought to have more rules. Where the conch is, that's a meeting. The same up here as down here.” This shows how Ralph tries bring the
The boys don’t want to be told what to do. This is not only true in the book but is a simple fact of adolescence. For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics states that, “From time to time most children defy the wishes of their parents. This is a part of growing up and testing adult guidelines and expectations. It is one way for children to learn about and discover their own selves, express their individuality, and achieve a sense of autonomy.” (American Academy of Pediatrics) The same goes for Lord of the Flies. The reader can think of Ralph as the parent who has the best interest for his son/daughter and Jack as his/her’s disobedient troubled friend. In Lord of the Flies the boys are at a stage where the disobedient troubled friend has a significant pull compared to the knowledgeable parent. The friend’s opinion can trump the parent’s in real life and does in Lord of the Flies when in chapter 8 some boys leave Ralph for Jack. This is concerning and is one of the main conflicts in Lord of the Flies. The loss of leadership was inevitable for Ralph because the boys are at a point in their life where they cannot exercise good judgement. For example, Jack is over the moon telling Ralph and the boys about how he killed a pig. Ralph who has better judgement has to remind Jack and say, “There was a ship-” (Golding, 75) This shows that Jack and the hunters do not have a good sense of judgement because they don’t do the most
The boys chose Ralph as their leader over Jack initially because of the power and strength he shows by holding the conch and using it to bring them all together. The defeat shocks Jack, but pushes him to discover ways to make the children bend to his will. William Golding’s brilliant usage of characterization in Lord of the Flies specifically focuses on Ralph’s start as a systematic yet ineffective leader and Jack’s manipulative leadership which causes their transformation from civilized and innocent boys into savage and malicious degenerates. Before the kids decided on a leader, Ralph proves himself a clear choice by using a conch to call the kids together.
A range of two leadership styles are depicted in William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, with Ralph representing a democratic leader, while Jack exemplifies a dictator. While on the island, the boys have a choice of following either Ralph, the more sensitive leader who cares about the others, or Jack, the more harsh leader who puts himself before the other boys and strives for power over the others.
In the book “Lord of the flies” by William Golding there is a group of boys that have crash landed on this island. But, majority of the boys don’t know each other. When the boys meet they pick a leader by voting and a boy named Ralph was selected. Ralph was one of the nice kids and never mean and treated all the kids fair. When he was selected a boy name Jack was upset because he had thought that he should become leader. “Im chief then” (23). When Ralph said this Jack felt like nobody liked him only the choir boys did but he ended up being the leader of them by being in charge and making them hunters. Jack was a type of leader that did not think much he would think of one idea then go do it he never plans nothing out. But Ralph thinks
“Many leaders are competent, but few leaders qualify as remarkable” (Economy). In William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies, a group of boys are stranded on an island as a result of a plane crash. A struggle for leadership quickly ensues between Ralph the protagonist and Jack the antagonist. From the start, Ralph emerges as leader and gets elected, edging Jack out of his position. Ralph’s focus, his ability to think, and his selflessness allows him to effectively lead the boys while they are stranded.
Lord of the flies is about leadership and how evil lies beneath every human. Leadership is important because it provides an inspirational figure to lead groups of people towards great accomplishments. A good leader should have the ability to stand up and lead the group to success. On the other hand, a bad leader is cruel and only thinks about himself. The best leader on the island is Ralph, followed by Jack and then Piggy.
In Lord of The Flies, Ralph and Jack both serve as figures of leadership in a sort of way, but they both represent different types of power just as this is prevalent in society. Ralph, the actual elected leader of the little tribe the boys have formed has his main focus centered around building shelters and making sure everyone is accounted for and taken care of. He feels for the liitleuns and how frightened and homesick they are, so he wants to build these shelters so they feel a sense of ‘home’ and maybe transition a little easier. While Jack, though he is not the elected leader, took on a sense of power and entailment on his own after he was assigned as a designated hunter. At first, Jack thought hunting would be easy and come easily to him, though it didn't exactly happen like that.
In “The Lord of the Flies” a group of boys are left stranded on a deserted island when their plane crashes. These boys then gather on the beach of the island and they determined that their best chance to survive was if they had a leader. Two boys on the island felt that they had the characteristics of a leader and would be the best fit for the leader of the island. These two boys were Jack and Ralph. Jack and Ralph both had very different styles of leaderships, but they both thought they would be the better one to fit the job. The boys end up having a vote on who they thought should be leader. Whoever wins the vote would be given power to have control over all the boys on the island. Ralph was the one voted to be leader. He was the first to set all of the rules on the island.
Lord of the Flies is not just a book about the life of children on a deserted island, but also the versatility and capability found in human beings. They are able to somehow survive when placed in desperate situations. William Golding has proven to show the adaptability in humans by integrating a variety of leadership styles within Lord of the Flies. Some characters have managed to become successful leaders, while others have been defeated into becoming followers. Here is a look at some of the differences between Ralph, Jack and Piggy’s management qualities and the challenges they face while achieving their goals, in chapters four, five and six.
“Many leaders are competent, but few qualify as remarkable” (Economy). In William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies, A group of are stranded on an island as a result of a plane crash. A struggle for leadership quickly ensues between the protagonist, Ralph and the antagonist, Jack. From the start Ralph emerged as leader and gets elected, edging jack out of the position. Ralph’s focus, his ability to think and his selflessness ensure his effectiveness to lead the boys while they are stranded on the island.
Throughout Lord of the Flies, Golding seems to suggest that the power struggle between Ralph and Jack corrupts the idea of what is right. The first time the corruption of power and control is seen is when Jack allows the fire to burn out while the choir boys and himself are out slaughtering a pig in the hunt (pg.76). Rescue had been the most important thing on the island. This remained true up until the point where Jack felt power and control after killing where “there was lashings of blood” (pg.76). Unsure if survival would be possible, keeping the fire going and staying focused on rescue was the right thing to do. Jack remained remiss to this and allowed the power and control he craved to corrupt his idea of what was right and important. Nearing the end of the novel, a disastrous decision is made when both Jack and Ralph decide to split after it is made evident the power struggle has corrupted the unity among the boys. Jack announces “I gave you food, and my hunters will protect you from the beast. Who will join my tribe?.” This ends all possibilities of rescue. By splitting, Jack chooses to sacrifice the rescue of the boys on the island in a final attempt to win the power struggle. Once again, the idea of what is right is
The emotionally driven decisions made by characters in both of the texts, result in characters facing a distorted perception of reality. Characters from novels, plays and movies often choose to allow their emotions to influence their actions, which end up leading them to believe in a false reality. In the novel Lord of the Flies, Jack’s bloodlust leads him into believing that by murdering pigs he is demonstrating that he is not only a good leader, but a better one than Ralph. Jack’s actions are based off his emotional state, where he is jealous of the title bestowed upon Ralph, and angry over the humiliation that he must face after failing to overthrow Ralph’s line of power (Golding, 127). Jack still manages to persuade some of the boys to follow his leadership rather than Ralph’s when he says “I’m not going to be a part of Ralph’s lot−” (Golding, 127). The select group of boys proceed with following Jack’s leadership which soon spreads like an disease to boys following Ralph’s leadership. With a small group of boys left to lead Ralph is left to believe there is “Nothing to be done” (Golding, 128). But it is Jack’s distorted perception of good leadership that continues to lead the boys towards failure. A
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies boys become lost on an island and have to learn how to survive without adults two young boys step up and become chiefs one Ralph(the logical one) the other Jack(the one for fun), reviewing the positive and negative aspects of Ralph’s leadership, Ralph struggles with the concepts that a leader cannot fall victim to peer pressure, or succumb to the fear of the beast, most of all lose the loyalty and structure of the society.