Lowering the voting age by two years could have positive results . Many countries have already done so, and America should follow. Voter turnout would be much larger if we lowerd the age requirment, because a bigger percent of the population would be able to vote. Our young people need to be more involved in our government. Sixteen year olds are much more mature now days than they were years ago. They go to school , and hold down jobs. They are much more responsible this day and age. lowering the age to vote could have a positive outcome , other countries have already done so. voter turnout would probrably increase, because a bigger percent of the population would be able to vote. Sixteen year olds are more mature by
Should the voting age be lowered to 16 years old? There's some pretty good reasons to! Sixteen-year-olds should be allowed to vote because it is a better starting age for voting, and it will help to ease the problem of not enough people voting. Plus, they already have plenty of adult-like responsibilities. Why not voting?
If the government allowed sixteen-year-olds to vote, they would build in them the habit of going out in elections at a young age. Eventually, that will result in increasing the overall voter turnout as the population ages. Middle adolescents would go out and practise their right out of habit. Consequently, the country will be more democratic. Moreover, politicians will care more about middle adolescents knowing that their voices count. Therefore, better services and advanced programs as well as critical wise decisions will take place creating a better environment for them. Overall, getting sixteen-year-olds into the habit of voting will definitely turn the table.
I personally don't have much political experience because my parents don't vote. Therefore I don't really care much about voting. If kids aren't exposed to politics or informed on why they should vote then I don't believe decreasing the voting age will make much of a difference. If 18-year-olds do not have a high number of votes I don't see how kids younger than that would make a difference. I don't believe lowering the age is solution to increases voters. I think we should focus more on teaching the importance of voting and why it makes a difference so that when they do turn 18 they will understand why they should vote and by understanding that I believe they will be more likely to
There are many concerns that might be brought upon if Congress chooses to lower the voting age in the U.S from 18 to 16. Many could assume that 16-year-olds are not competent enough to make mature and informed decisions. They could either choose to not vote or vote the way their parents tell them to vote. There have been past issues with lowering the voting age in America from 21 to 18. Dissatisfaction among many people could cause a huge conflict if lowering the voting age to 16. Although, we must weigh out the pros and cons of lowering the voting age. This will possible affect the voter turnout in a positive way. For those who vote earlier in life can possible develop a habit of voting in the near future. As of right now, we have a low
By lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 some people suggest improvement of voter turnout. On the other hand the problem is that by doing this there would be a decrease in the participation percentage. Most of the younger people would not take the time to vote; much less take the time to understand what they're voting for.
In my position I agree to lower the age of voting to 16-17 years old because it can raise up the percentage of voting. Many people are not voting because they don't believe it can help them and their community also with the support from 16-17 years old, it can show a huge difference on how the votes are increasing little by little. Also it can gives them experience on what's the voting like. Once they get older, they will know what to do because they registered the vote in an
There have been many advantages and disadvantages to the change in the age requirement to vote. Currently the biggest disadvantage has been the voter participation percentage, followed by the demographic of the voters. With the age requirement being lowered to 16 the negatives may out weigh the postive.
By allowing 16 years old to vote, it could make them more interested in politics. Before voting, they will want to investigate about each party and the policies they have. Which in turn could will make them more interested in politics. There is an urgent need for younger people to get involved in politics and by lowering the voting age this could create a new wave of politicians. By allowing 16 years old to vote, schools will have to teach politics in school and go into greater depth about politics.
I think that lowering the age to vote would have a bigger turnout then keeping it at 18. The only thing to disprove this argument is, ( younger voters show a lack of civic responsibility). Athough 16 is a young age to vote , it does not mean they dont have a clear openion on how they want to live. If you think about it, two years later their an adult and now living their life with a presadent that they had no say over.
In lowering the age of voting, I feel as if this would benefit America and the younger generation. It would help the percentage of participation from all age groups, in a positive way. Meaning parents can bring their children to vote alongside of them.
First if we lower the voting age to 16, it will show the world we as a Nation are relying on minors to boost our voting percentages. Which will make our Nation look inferiour to other countries. The maturity level of 16 year olds is not sufficient enough to make those choices. Most 16 year olds cannot get themselves to School let alone make a good choice in voting for the leadership of our Nation. Our Nations minors should concentrate on education first.
Lowering the voting age has always been a contraversial issue. Yes, there may be some benefits to lowering the voting age to 16 but personally I think the current voting age of 18 is plenty low enough. Lowering the voting age any further would be counterproductive.
Recently, citizens have urged politicians to lower the voting age to 16. I do not agree with the people calling for the decrease in age, to make an effort to vote. Statistics prove that young voters percential in voting turned out low. I believe the focus should be on maintaining and improving the convienience of voting for the high percetage of active voters. I know from experience, lowering the age to vote may spark an interest in some young citizens, but not many.
My opinion of lowering the voting age is, that they should leave it at 18, because if they lower the age to 16 many young people dont care about voting ,or they have no knowledge about who to vote for, they are just going to vote randomly, with out knowing who is the perfect candidate. I think that the best way to increse the percentage of voters is by allowing people to vote from home, or having alot of voting places, because most of the people dont like to go far,or like to be in crowded places, leaving the age at 18 will also be a good thing ,because most of the people 18 and oldther have more kwnoledge on who to vote for, because they know who is trying to do the right things for there country. Most of the arguments of lowering the age
Therefore, the voting age should most certainly not be raised. We as a nation would be taking a step backwards if we did so. Just because they aren't utilizing this to their best ability doesn't mean it has to be taken away. They should be encouraged and prompted to want to do this for