Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Problem: David H. Lucas purchased two beach front lots on Isle of Palms in Charleston county in 1986 for 900,000 with intent to later build one single family home on each lot. The following year when South Carolina conducted a survey of the coast line the rustles showed that the beaches of South Carolina were critically eroding. Due to the rustles of the survey South Carolina issued the Beachfront Management Act (BMA). The act placed restraints on the usage of land along the coast line, and because the building line was moved inward Lucas' lots were affected with no exceptions provided. When he bought those lots the year before that particular
…show more content…
The court agreed that Lucas had suffered a total loss of the value of his property and concluded that regulatory taking had occurred. On appeal, the South Carolina Supreme Court revised the decision, on the grounds that the BMA had been passed to prevent serious harm to the public. Lucas petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case and the Court sided with Lucas saying that the Beachfront Management Act of 1988 had not been designed to benefit the state in obtaining land for public use, but was to prevent harm to the public. The Court ruled that Lucas suffered a taking, and that his property was rendered valueless by South Carolina statue and that he was entitled to just compensation as stated in the fifth and fourteen adamants of our Constitution. Significance: Although the South Carolina Supreme Court decided that state regulations were designed to prevent serious public harm, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when a property owner suffered a taking, there were no exceptions from common rule ( the Takings Clause and the just Compensation Clause). Furthermore, when the state of South Carolina amended its original statute by including provisions that might permit limited construction, the U.S. Supreme Court held that property owners must still be compensated. Even when legislation later renders the initial act less restrictive,
In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of
March 25, 1931, nine men hopped on to a freight train of no return (Uschan 10). Unjust, prejudice, and racist the Scottsboro Trials, were definitely not just another ordinary case. The Scottsboro Trials changed how America viewed segregation. The nine young men, who hopped onto that train that day, were innocent and harmless. The Scottsboro Trials revealed the unjust treatment that African Americans faced outside of the Harlem Renaissance and changed views on segregation.
This is not just an architectural design and the fashion, but because of the fact that the developers know that the land is being swallowed by the sea. More and more houses, hotels, shops and restaurants have decks and some piers that lead into and over the water. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection even has courses for those in construction to acknowledge the erosion and increase the proper design, construction and maintenance of erosion and sediment control. The beaches, whether sandy or rocky are the buffers that keep the sea at bay from the land behind enemy lines. They are nature’s way of saving all the people and their livelihoods from being swept away into the deep blue yonder. When waves crash into the beach it carries sediment with it and deposits such sediment. The alternative is that when a wave recedes back into the ocean it carries that sediment back to sea. This is usually done at an unequal rate, and leads to coastal erosion. In fact, coastal erosion is one of the reasons we have so many beautiful beaches around the world due to their unique shape. Long shore currents move water in a parallel direction of the shoreline, carrying the sand with it. But as we continue to build piers, docks, sea walls, and jetties
It took nearly 40 years to win the fight to protect these ancient and pristine coral reefs islands. By the 1950s, Florida tourism was booming, and property values were skyrocketing. They had a different plan for the area: a national park that would preserve and protect the islands, the bay to the west and the reefs to the east.Herbert W. Hoover, Jr., the vacuum cleaner magnate, famously gave Washington legislators blimp rides around the area, in hopes that once people saw how beautiful the area was, they too would want to preserve it. Biscayne Bay National Monument was finally established in 1968. The area wouldn’t become a national park until
The book Decision in Philadelphia the Constitutional Convention if 1787 by Christopher and James Collier offers a unique look at the scribing of the Constitution and the events that not only surrounded it but led up to its creation. The authors take on the events and their creative writing style make the book and enjoyable and fact filled read on one of the country’s most important events. They begin with a historical look at the events that led up to the signing and a brief synopsis of the events that were occurring in the country at the time. The background that they give provides a good base for the information and allows the reader to see things through the eyes of someone living in the time.
When Dred Scott v. Sandford was decided in 1857, it made an enormous impact on the United States. It riled up both pro- and anti-slavery Americans. It angered many Americans in an extreme example of judicial activism. Some say it made the Civil War inevitable. By the time the dust had settled and the 13th and 14th Amendments reversed the Court’s decision, Dred Scott could be considered one of the worst Supreme Court decisions of all time. And yet, although the case was egregiously wrong, it still can be considered a “great case”.
Facts: Plaintiffs Carl and Elaine Miles, owners and impresarios of “Blackie, The Talking Cat” brought a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the S.D. Georgia, challenging the constitutionality of the Augusta, GA, Business License Ordinance. They complained that the ordinance was inapplicable in their case “accepting contributions from pedestrian in the downtown Augusta area, who wanted to hear the cat speak “and that the ordinance violates the rights of speech. The Plaintiffs attacked the ordinance as being unconstitutional and overbroad in contravention of the due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The people of North Carolina pictured complex courts, labor estates, and the production of silk, however, they eventually realized that governing a colony was a lot more involved than they would have anticipated. North Carolina went through a great deal of religious problems, because there were so many different religions coming into play. During the beginning of their religious controversy, the Anglican Church was known as the original church, as well as the only one that would be funded by the government. Eventually that rule was thrown out because the people began to do their own thing and starting up their own churches/ religion, such as: Baptists, Moravians, The Quakers, Presbyterians and many more. After the religion controversy came the Scot-Irish controversy, were many Scots and Irish began to move toward the Virginia area and began to take away cloth business from England, who in turn came
The “Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County” case is about a lawsuit filed by Mr. Bryce Zimpfer
There will always be controversy over everything. Someone will always want to fight against an opinion or a choice made. This has never been expressed more through the case of Dred Scott versus Sanford. The choice of said case, still today, is considered one of the worst decisions ever made by the United States Supreme court. The case decided that Dred Scott was not able to sue in a United States Court and that Congress does not have the power to declare certain states free or slave states.
The Wayne County commissioners approved a request from Prosecutor Dan Lutz to appoint the Holmes County Prosecutor’s Office to take over a case involving a former Wooster Police officer who allegedly broke into a current officer’s home.
Individual rights versus the good of the community, is an issue that American has struggled with for a long time. In addition, the case of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Mr. Lucas contended that his two beautiful but fragile beachfront properties located in Barrier Islands were made worthless by the passage of the Beachfront Management Act. According to the Supreme Court, the Coastal Council was simply using its “police powers” to “protect our state’s unstable coastline from further erosion caused by construction.” (South Carolina Tribune)
For my first civics project, I took advantage of the online opportunity and chose to watch an argument of the Florida Supreme Court v. Dale Norman. This particular case was taken to the supreme court to decided whether Mr. Norman was protected under the constitution for carrying an open weapon (non concealed) in Florida. In Florida it is illegal to carry an open weapon in public but he claimed that due to the second amendment, it was his constitutional right. In the end, the Supreme Court decided that Florida's law for concealment does not violate the constitution because the right and the ability to defend yourself with a firearm does not directly have anything to do with having the weapon concealed or open. Here is the link I used to find
Dissenting opinions: Justice Clark wrote his opinion that he would affirm the convictions given to the African American’s. Justice Clark believes that the city manager was trying to avoid the protestors from a riot by arresting all protestors.
You’re tucking your hood into your wetsuit, and a security officer tells you can no longer enter the water at this point, because it is a private beach. Is this a forthcoming reality? Unfortunately, it may become a reality if the California Coastal Commission (CCC) fails to fight development the way it has in the past. Recently, Charles Lester, a longtime advocate against development and historic guardian of the California coastline was fired from his position as the Executive Director at the CCC, on grounds that he was not doing a good job of balancing development needs with coastal preservation. Prior to his dismissal, the social media newsfeeds of surfers and ocean lovers alike was inundated with the news. Thousands made the pilgrimage to Morro Bay, to support Lester. Despite efforts, Lester was fired and the news faded—the coast could now become developed in areas where it never was before.