Michael Tooley Theory Of Virtue Ethics

· A personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories

Virtue ethics is a theory of ethics in moral philosophy in which it emphasizes that the notion of virtue is key to a

The Virtue Theory, also know as Virtue Ethics, refers to the character of each person. This theory states that every person should try for excellence. The characteristics of each individual are made up from their environment that they are a part of. The theory would further suggest

The first theory I will compare virtue ethics against is ethical egoism. The two theories share a commonality apart from being normative in nature. They both seek what is best for the doer. Aristotle claimed that happiness is ultimately attained by striving for the “function of man” which is the excellence found within virtue. This is comparable to ethical egoism because of it’s principle of exclusively acting in one’s own best interest. While virtue ethics states that a virtuous character is the goal, ethical egoism is not specific to what is in a person’s best interest. If attaining a virtuous character is

Think about your personal definition of morality. Is it a set of independent morals or are they applicable to the community as a whole? Virtue refers to high moral standards. In the pre-revolutionary American colonies, the idea of virtue was central to the idea of the “quintessential American”. Benjamin Franklin and John Winthrop created their own set of virtues to live by. Both of the prominent colonists drew from their past experiences, religious beliefs, and their beliefs about the foundation of human nature. Because he took an individualistic approach motivated by divine reward, Benjamin Franklin changed Boston’s idea of virtue from the Puritanical, community based morals set by John Winthrop decades previously.

Virtue Ethics: Virtue Ethics suggests that one makes a decision using moral code and virtues that identify one’s character rather than the application of one’s culture or external laws.

Virtue theory uses practical rationality to explain why one ought to act morally. Considerations that stem from human needs help us find reason in our actions. Those actions are ones that help us retain the function of our human will and the goodness of that will.

Morality, distinctly defines what is right and what is wrong, but theory of virtue ethics is the mechanism an individual uses to make those moral decisions. Virtue is essentially having a good moral character. And ethics are a set of rules that influence an individual’s behavior, but are subjective; because in part, these rules are developed by the individual’s perception for what is morally good or bad. One aspect of virtue ethics is that, the decisions are not as important as the process an individual uses to develop of one’s moral character over time. Comprehension of this concept is important, as it will allow an individual to achieve the ultimate goal of happiness. As there was no economics concepts in the thirteenth century, moral philosophies such as the theory of virtue ethics heavily determined how individuals behave and engage in the

Virtue ethics is an approach to ethics that emphasizes an individual 's character as the key element of ethical thinking. Virtue ethical theories originate to ancient Greek philosophy discussion of what were recognized as the four cardinal virtues- wisdom, justice, fortitude and temperance." The roots of virtue theory lie in pre-Socratic times but commenced in earnest with Socrates’ infuriating questioning of the values and beliefs of his fellow Athenians. The theory was significantly advanced by Plato and was definitively elaborated by Aristotle himself

Ethics are the “standards of conduct that indicate how one should behave based on moral duties and virtues.”

After reading your discussion, I would have to agree with you on all of the points you made throughout your discussion. I am also an animal lover and I do not think animals should be held in captivity for our own pleasure. I am also against unsafe fishing practices that result in harming and killing animals. I noticed that you applied your argument to theory of virtue ethics. I do believe that being a good role model for future generations could have an impact on how we view animals in the world. Utilitarianism can also be applied to captive animals and unsafe fishing practices. The happiness of humans does not outweigh the suffering of captive animals or animals that are injured or killed in fishing nets. In regards to whether certain animals should be given special considerations, I noticed that you think that all animals should be considered equal.

Virtue ethics discover and classify what moral character is in our life .In my point of view, it is about the conformity to a standard of right which is different from everybody point of view. According to Hooker, “Rational decision making must start by making sense of our role in the world “which means that we have to practice the moral excellence at all the time in order to be in conformity with the Virtue ethics rule.

Virtue ethics is one out of the three main ideas in normative ethics. This form of ethics has a huge emphasize on the relationship between moral characters (virtues) and rules plus the possible consequences. There are different lists of virtues, but according to Socrates “virtue is knowledge” making knowledge the main or only true virtue (Hursthouse).

The Stanford of Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines virtue ethics as an ethical approach “that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism).” Additionally, The Stanford of Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives an example of a virtue ethicist by saying that a virtuous person will help someone in need because it is charitable and contributes to the good of society.

It is an enduring idea with ancient roots. Virtue ethics considers internal motivations directed at realizing the end of a “good” person, and it is in this that the religious and secular worlds can find agreement. Through virtue ethics, a leader does not focus on the end result of his actions, nor does he stick to the rule book all the time; instead he tries to the thing that would be right to do at that particular moment. It has been observed that supplying an internal motivation is a better way of obtaining a good outcome. Having said all, we have arrived to the position that virtue ethics might turn out to be an ancient solution to the modern