Monitoring Student Social Medi Article Analysis

Schools should take action if there is harm being done to others. In Document A of” Should Schools Be Allowed to Limit Students’ Online Speech?”, they surveyed a random sample of 10-18 year-olds from a large school district in the southern US. It shows that girls are more likely to be cyberbullied. It also shows that girls are more likely to cyberbully somebody else. According to the graph, 25.1% of girls have been cyberbullied in their lifetime,

Social media has been a topic of debate for years. Some people are strongly against any use of it while others like the instant connection it provides. A major concern over social media is the lasting effects it has on teenagers. Social media can affect teenagers through many ways including things like their self-esteem. Cyberbullying is a raging topic of discussion centered around teens social media use. It can also effect their people skills and create a lack of community involvement. Some parents think that watching what their children do on social media is an invasion of privacy but is your concern for their privacy greater than your concern for their safety? Social media poses a great danger to today’s children. It can affect many aspects of their lives.

Higher education law attorney Dana L. Fleming voices her controversial opinion in favor of institutionalized involvement in social network protection in her article “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” (Fleming). Posted in the New England Journal of Higher Education, winter of 2008 issue, Fleming poses the question of responsibility in monitoring students’ online social networking activities. With a growing population of students registering on social networks like Facebook and MySpace, she introduces the concern of safety by saying, “like lawmakers, college administrators have not yet determined how to handle the unique issues posed by the public display of their students’

Kids need to watch what they post online. For example, If a student post something online about bullying school officials should be able to punish them for it. Fourteen states have passed an anti-cyberbullying law, so if the student is punished by school officials first, they are less likely to get in legal trouble. Schools should get to punish kids for misbehaving online, because it might save lives. In addition, Kids should not be misbehaving online. Kids should know what is right and what is wrong. According to Joseph Maneen, “If the students have done something worth taking the social media password, of course the school should take it.” Kids need to do what is right online, because it might ruin their reputation. Furthermore, Schools and Police officers should be able to check people's phones because it can help keep our cities safe. According to the Detective Chris Grider, “Checking phones helps to establish

Schools and the public are wasting time and resources on the over-exaggerated issue of cyberbullying. Today, schools are wasting much of their time worrying about cyberbullying and in popular media it’s mentioned too much. Schools should not be allowed to limit online speech. It’s not needed since most students haven’t been cyberbullied, cyberbullying hasn’t been proven to be very disruptive and online gossip is not common.

The impulses and desires of the ordinary school bully are substantially higher with the development of the social media. This development had made it very difficult for some parents and guardians to keep an eye on the stuff their students are posting on their profile and who they are messaging. Teenagers shouldn’t expect the same privacy they had when they were younger.

Today, in the society that we live in, many teens tend to expose their life on social media. They post inappropriate pictures of themselves, google things that aren’t for their age, and sometimes even cyberbully. In the article, “At Some Schools, ‘Big Brother is Watching’”, Kelly Wallace wrote about some unfortunate things that have occurred on social media. The article mentions ways that spying on a kid can help prevent bullying and suicide thoughts. In her article, she includes how the privacy of a student on social media is completely taken away. Wallace believes that the district should not be able to view anything that a teen publishes online. In my opinion, Wallace is correct because everyone has the right to privacy and students should

"According to the First Amendment, Congress cannot prohibit the freedoms of speech, or the press. There has been controversy over the government overstepping its lines involving internet content. I believe that the government has the right monitor emails and social media accounts if there is a threat of potential terrorism. I also believe in net neutrality. But there is a stopping point. I do not think it is right for schools to monitor emails and social media accounts

I believe that this is completely fair, especially if the student being monitored is on a school computer, device, or on the school’s wireless internet connection. School administration has the right to view this data, especially if cyberbullying or illegal activity is taking place. Schools should adamantly monitor this abuse of technology in any circumstance. Some worry that their privacy is being violated. If a student feels another student is cyberbullying them or taking part in illegal activity, that student should notify their school and let them know that these terrible things are going on. The schools should not constantly watch over students’ social media and internet usage unless certain students have been flagged for inappropriate usage. Cyberbullying is a worthy cause of this overseeing of technology usage. Schools should monitor students’ internet activity to prevent further crimes from taking

Williams (2008) and Papandrea (2012) are both law review articles about social media. While Williams focuses on student use including, Papandrea reviews legal cases that affect educators. Williams presents various challenges concerning use of social media including cyberbullying to free speech. Papandrea addresses free speech as well, but presents it from the educators view point. Additionally, free speech in the context of employment is addressed.

In Christine Weiser's article, she discusses the school districts that decided against the use of these social media platforms. Through various interview excerpts, she reveals why educators dislike social media usage in the classroom environments with the main concern "that [they are] creating an avenue for increased bullying". There is also the concerns "about protecting student

Although many people do believe that district administrators should monitor students’ social media accounts, district administrators should definitely NOT monitor the social media accounts because student privacy and the right to free speech is being trampled, district administrators do not need to be parenting kids, police should be taking up for it, not school officials, and many more

Teachers monitoring students outside of school would be a great stress on the teachers. They would have to create lesson plans for all of their children, make sure the children are learning, make sure there are no problems at school, and take care of their families at home. If we added monitoring social media to this long list of their responsibilities teachers would be stressed out. Teachers are responsible for lots of things. These responsibilities are very important in order for everyone to be successful and if we stressed them out they might not be able complete their tasks to the best of their ability. Monitoring social media should be left up to children’s

“As the use of social media increases and becomes an integral part of nearly every student’s life, problems arise when student expression on these sites turns into threats against the school or other students, implicating both student safety and the speaker’s right to free speech” (Hughes 208). There’s no denying that social media has become a part of most people’s daily life. We have sites like Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, etc. These websites, or apps, allow us to express ourselves in any way possible, whether it’s supporting families who lost a member in a mass shooting, trying to impeach the latest president, or donating to those who are victims of natural disasters. It’s not always that social

Many people state “Kids should not be misbehaving on social networking sites in the first place” as their reason. However, that does not mean that every child should have their privacy invaded because some of their peers made bad choices. Teachers and officials should have more trust in their students. The majority of students don’t partake in inappropriate behavior online, so why should they have to suffer the consequences because a few students do? Not to mention, punishing a student for something they said online is a complete violation of freedom of speech. We should only be censoring our students when absolutely