Business Analysis Name of the business: The firm is called More Vino LTD. Nature of the business: More Vino LTD is a multilevel business. It operates four subunits: wholesaling and distribution, a retail store, a bar and a restaurant, and a delivery service. Marketing analysis: More Vino LTD operates in the alcohol industry. The products are essentially alcohol derivatives especially wine. In addition to wine, they sell hors d’oeuvres and appetizers in the bar and the restaurant. More Vino is located in Port of Spain, Trinidad. Trinidad is one of the islands of Trinidad and Tobago, and is located at the southern-most end of the Caribbean. Port of Spain is the capital city of Trinidad but also the place where all the business …show more content…
The decrease in inventory days means that the efficiency of the firm in terms of its inventory is good. The TAT of 2.0 for 2006 and 3.9 for 2007 mean that More Vino is low asset intensive. This increase in TAT is driven by a large increase in sales. The average collection period is very low with 1 day for 2007 and 3 days for 2006. This is due to the fact that most of the sales are driven by on-site consumption then consumers pay quickly. The company is managing its receivables well. The FAT has been stable to 5.8 for both years. This high number means that the company is effectively using its fixed assets. For More Vino LTD, one point of significance is the negative cash flows from operations in 2006 (2,918,738). The cash flow crunch is apparently caused by a net loss for the year 2006 (2,015,034). There is no mention of any human resources issues affecting performance but the fact that the fact that the Stone brothers own only one-third of the shares of their company could be a problem in the future. Financial analysis: Christian and David Stone invested their own money in the company. However, they seek additional funding from Arthur Greenway and Rose Moore in order to expand. The owners’ distribution is as follows: Greenway and Moore control two-thirds of the shares and the remaining one-third is controlled by the brothers. They have additional funding needs because they consider expanding the restaurant and the bar. The low current
The company have generated very low operating cash flows, which is caused by a negative net income(16, 55) in 94,95, again with sales going down and cost of goods sold increasing. The company current ratio (2.3, 2.1, 2.5) in 93, 94, 95 are indicating satisfactory but when analyze quick ratio (1.1, 1.1, 1.3), and we also know that sales are down which mean more inventories. Now the account payable days has been increasing (49, 62, and 66). They have been delaying there payment which mean more cash on
The decline of inventory turnover presents the incresed possibility of inventory obsolescence which is likely to be assessed as higher business risk. In debts to equity part, the ratio in current year is much higher than that of preceeding year, which means the extent of use of debt in financing company is much higher than before. Pinnacle has used most of its borrowing capacity and has little cushion for addional debt.This action brought high business risk to Pinnacle. In addition, Pinnacle puchase more inventory in current year that that of preceeding year, and net sales are increasing also compared previous year. However, the net income is decreased significantly. These changes show expenses (maybe direct or indirect) have increased dramaticly. The company uses more expensive materials and labors to manufacure and sell products.
Financial statements could be examined with varied degrees, as part of the client acceptance procedures Paige CPA got to perform a horizontal and vertical analysis, and financial ratio analysis of Vinand Petroleum financial statements. These procedures are not as in depth as other procedures used by auditors on financial statements, but these procedures may show areas of concern for auditors. From 2006 to 2007, Vinand’s long term debt tripled and its interest expense paid for the year did not reflect this drastic increase. This could mean that Vinand has taken on a large amount of debt with a low interest rate, which will not bode well for the financial health of the company in the future. In the same breadth,
The company’s increase in inventory (illustrated on the statement of cash flows) rose after 1970 and culminated by a drastic increase in 1973. This increase in inventory (especially in 1973) appears to be heavily financed by short-term and long-term borrowing rather than the typical accounts payable. This is a bit unusual and in 1973 (when they acquired the greatest amount of debt equity, their accounts payable decreased. Their sales were not sufficient to offset the large outflows of inventory related costs. Furthermore, Grant’s decentralization was also a cause of their financial woes because rather than corporately controlling credit extension and credit terms, they allowed each store manager to set their own policies (and manipulate them as they desired). This disastrous policy imploded in 1975 when the company had to make a $155.7 million provision for bad debt expense. So not only did the company have substantial debt and bad debt to equity ratios, they were forced to write off about 8.8% of their total sales from 1975.
The Lawsons’ efficiency ratios are another section the bank will find troubling. The company’s age of payables has nearly tripled over the last four years. This can be detrimental to the company’s image and reliability including their reliability toward the bank if granted the loan. Along with increasing age of payables is increasing age of receivables and age of inventory. Indicating that Mr. Mackay is taking longer to collect his receivables and that he has purchased too much inventory. Too much inventory results can result in further issues
The significant decline in fixed asset turnover could be attributed to the declining sales figures, but overall further exemplifies the company’s lack of efficiency. Continuing to evaluate the operations of the company, the company is having trouble collecting payments, with an average collection period ranging between 53 and 78 days. Because the company’s sales are 25% installment plans, Haefren Baum seems to be offering extremely loose credit terms, which would explain the increase in average collection period. Days inventory held is also on the increase, which shows that it takes too much time for the company to turn inventory into profit. One hundred thirty days is unacceptable in business. However, it should be noted that for a high quality home furnishing retailer a high inventory days might be quite normal.
Wine retailer More Vino LTD is located in Port of Spain, Trinidad. It operates four subunits: wholesaling and distribution, a retail store, a bar, a restaurant, and a delivery service, making it a successful multilevel business.
The liquidity, profitability, and solvency ratios reveal some interesting points about Kudler Fine Food’s financial position. The liquidity ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was having no trouble paying short-term debt. However, the current and acid-test (quick) ratios showed that during 2003 Kudler had an excess amount of cash that they were not investing properly. These ratios also showed that Kudler was collecting receivables and selling average inventory very quickly. The profitability ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was using assets efficiently and making a decent profit. The profit margin ratio showed that during 2002 Kudler made a profit of four cents per dollar, and during 2003 they made a profit
The Inventory Turnover Period has improved for ASOS, in 2014 it only took the company 120 days to sell inventory where in 2013 it was taking them 141 days. This proves that the amount of time inventory is held for before it is sold has decreased. However, the Trade Receivables Settlement Period has increased by 1 day. Meaning, it may be taking longer for receivables to be settling their debt with ASOS. Until the debt is settled it is seen as a loss for the company. The Trade Payables Settlement Period has reduced by 3 days to 20 days and this ratio measures just how long the company will take to pay its debts (to its suppliers). Therefore, this means that the Working Capital Cycle has also been reduced by 17, which is an improvement as the
Generally speaking, the shorter of the A/R turnover in days, the better efficiency of current capital. But the data of this firm is higher than the industry average level, it indicates there is an inefficient use of current capital and a problem of management, especially in 2001.But it started dropping dramatically in 2002 which reflects an obviously improvement of management.
Based on Next Annual Report and Account January (2011), the chief executive's review present the A New Normal of company overview, due to the changing consumer environment, Next PLC need to have New avenues of growth, and brand new way to control cost, also, it will be important that retailer have to generate the healthy cash flow with cautious management. Furthermore, enable to know how company efficiently use asset to generate revenue and whether there was improvement between 2010 and 2011, the activity ratios have to calculate out. The ROCE in 2010 and 2011 were 38.91%,41.79%, this number showed how profit generated by capital employed, and the growth figure of ROCE lead to level up efficiency asset used.((NEXT PLC, 2011 page43, 45) The figure for inventory turnover, receivable turnover, and payable turnover in 2010 and 2011 were 46.81 days, 54.98 days; 66.07days, 68.23 days; 83.36days,81.3days; respectively. (ibid) It is clearly show that the inventory and receivable turnover in 2010 was taken lesser day than 2011, in which means inventories took less day to sold out to costumer and the cash credit receive more faster than the 2011, besides, the payable turnover had longer period than 2011, it was also a good example to illustrate that there was more cash flow holding by company, and the overall image of these figure present that the resource had been
The liquidity, profitability, and solvency ratios reveal some interesting points about Kudler Fine Food’s financial position. The liquidity ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was having no trouble paying short-term debt. However, the current and acid-test (quick) ratios showed that during 2003 Kudler had an excess amount of cash that they were not investing properly. These ratios also showed that Kudler was collecting receivables and selling average inventory very quickly. The profitability ratios revealed that during 2002 and 2003, Kudler was using assets efficiently and making a decent profit. The profit margin ratio
Support: The inventory increase in 1997, YOY, was 58%. Additionally, the COGS to revenue ratio reduced from to 72% in 1997. This combination of increase in inventory and reduction in COGS as a percentage of revenue seems to indicate that the fixed costs may have been spread over a larger base through over production, thereby causing the COGS to reduce. This may be a cause for concern and could be a potential red flag.
Although the company seems to be profitable, it has faced shortage of cash. It happened due to increase in Accounts Receivable as well as Inventories. On the other hand, Accounts Payable does not increase that rapidly and difficulties regarding cash collection become evident. Furthermore, the cash collection cycle becomes larger (59 days in year 2003, while more than 70 in year 2006).
Decreasing inventory processing period shows the time it takes for company to turn its inventory. It is measure of inventory effectiveness. Lower values are desirable and by calculating the number of days that a company holds onto inventory before selling, the efficiency ratio measures the average length of time that a company’s cash is tied up in inventory. Payables payment period is increasing constantly from FY2012-13 at 56.94 days to 71.32 days in FY 2014-15 which means company has more cash in hand but it may also lead to supplier dis-satisfaction. So PepsiCo should keep a check on the growth of the payment period to its suppliers. On contrast receivables collection period has been constant over the 3 years which implies it is getting timely returns from its