Mr Sundstrom Case

Your client Sue is a Social Work Assistant. In your last session she disclosed that she is concerned that on a recent home visit, herself and a senior colleague did not follow the necessary policies and procedures. They had visited a family with a history of neglect and domestic violence and did not ask to see the child or enter the home, both these actions are prescribed as appropriate as part of their work.

RESOURCE UPDATE: Client continues to report last week she went to Center 37 and she was told that her Center is now 066. Client was upset that she was transfer to another shelter. As per the client she will lose her Linc V if she is transferred to Center 66. CM tries to explain to the client HRA transfer many clients because Center 37 is overcrowded. Client reported she requested for her case to be closed. Client continues to report she spoke with HRA Rep Ms. Perez who requested for the client to put her request in writing. Client stated she did put her request in writing to have her case closed from center 66. Then the client provided this worker with copy

From ethical and legal perspectives, what do you feel business has learned from the Scrushy situation?

Contrary to the alleged, Dr. Brock refuted the claim, defending that he never established a doctor-patient relationship with Anita, which relieves him of liability. In order to validate his refute, Dr. Brock provided four factual elements that were supported by his counterparts; Dr. Whitfield and Dr. Ketcham. The four elements that were presented in the affidavit included: (1) That there has never been a doctor-patient relationship between Dr. Brock and Anita Oliver, (2) Dr. Brock has never seen or talked to Anita or Cathy Oliver, (3) Dr. Brock was not employed, engaged or requested to serve as a consultant to treat Anita, (4) and Dr. Brock was not employed or engaged to consult with doctors treating Anita, concerning complaints or medical problems. In order to support Dr. Brock’s refute, Dr. Whitfield and Dr. Ketcham provided affidavit’s as

On March 39, 2017, at 1224hrs, VA police received a Duress Alarm for 1E127. Investigation revealed that the Veteran was upset over not being able to receive her Ulfima Five Tens Unit. The MSA Clerk informed her that she would have to attend a class on how to properly us the Tens Unit. The Veteran demanded she give her the Tens Unit, because she had use it in the past. When the MSA Clerk refused and told her she would schedule her an appointment, the Veteran got angry and called the Clerk a witch and walked off. VA Police made contact with the Veteran at Primary Care Desk B lobby. Where the veteran gave an omission and stated she had an appointment and because the clerk was not at her desk she missed it. VA Police did however confirm that

Dr. Joseph Lifschutz was a practicing psychiatrist in California and sought a “writ of habeas corpus” to be released from custody in the county of San Mateo California. Dr. Lifschutz was found in contempt of court and was arrested for refusing to obey an order of the San Mateo court ordering his release of records relating to him and one of his patients. Dr. Lifscutz did not follow the order because he believed the order from the court was unconstitutional, violating his constitutional right to privacy. Joseph Housek had been a patient of Dr. Lifscutz for around six months. As a result of being assaulted, he sued his assailant. In an attempt to discredit the case, the defense wanted information to try to prove the plaintiff was not competent.

During my twenty years in medical sales, FMRS surpassed it's competitors as the leader in mental health care, FMRS possessed the qualities to rise to a Center of Excellence in mental health. Murmurings regarding racism began with the facilities conception; the black community is rife with racist encounters with FMRS. Despite racial accusations, many expected you to take mental health care to another level. Your name is mental throughout the state as a leader in mental health. Nevertheless, a company is only as good as its employees. The mental hygiene commissioner rubber stamped the application; therefore, no one noticed or dared point out, Petitioner's flagrant attempt to invalidate the application. Petitioner's actions on Page 5 of the application is an excellent example of "consciousness of guilt." Obviously, Petitioner, expected swift punishment for his

What law is applicable to the determination of the competency of the wife of the petitioner as a

He reports the patient’s roommate was subsequently evicted from his home after the landlord inquired about the ambulance visiting. He reports he contacted her father concerning the patient residing within the family home, but the father has said no. In addition, he reports he has attempted to contact her uncle but has been unable to make contact with him. He reports he has attempted to make contact with her said friend who is considering allowing her the opportunity to reside with her but she has not answered her phone and he has been unable to leave a voice message. He reports no one wants her in their home, and the patient has “burned her bridges” with family members. He reports her family would benefit from counseling. In addition, he reports her family has high expectations of CPS. He reports her current case was not going to close within 12 days of 06/30/2017. In addition, the case will not

The service user I chose to assess is a 17-year-old Hispanic male whose modified name is Ricardo Sanchez. I provided casework services to Ricardo for two years in my previous role as a Therapeutic Caseworker at my current workplace, the Children’s Village, a foster care agency. Ricardo was placed in foster care after he was removed from his father’s care due to verbal and physical abuse. Ricardo’s father assumed his custody after Ricardo’s mother passed over a drug overdose when he was 15. This was Ricardo’s second time in foster care. Ricardo’s first foster care experience happened when he was 10 years-old as a result of alleged physical abuse by his mother, who at the time had full custody of Ricardo. The report was made by Ricardo’s third grade teacher after noticing bruises on Ricardo’s arms. At the time, Ricardo was only in foster care for two months as

The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicant states, in effect, his discharge is unfair, because his mental condition was not acknowledged or considered. The applicant states, in effect, he had two separate offenses related to Spice, but he was never found guilty of possession, using, or purchasing Spice. The applicant contends he admitted to having tried Spice before when he was in a deep depression/anxiety state, after he was wrongfully assaulted by an El Paso, Texas, Police Officer. The applicant states, in effect, he was slammed face first into the concrete by an El Paso, Texas, Police Officer, causing severe dental fracture. The applicant contends his resulting appearances cause him to isolate himself and seek treatment from behavioral health services for atypical behavior. The applicant contends that after months of seeing a psychiatrist and psychologist, he was making progress until his identical twin brother separated, and his support system immediately deteriorated. The applicant contends he started binge drinking, even though he was under age and when he could not get alcohol, he would go ballistic. The applicant states, in effect, he unfortunately turned to Spice, which led to him be spotted

made every reasonable attempt to receive the criminal background checks in a timely manner. Loving Hearts Home Healthcare Inc. remained in constant and consistent contact with the Virginia State Police Staff, checking and maintaining the status of the criminal records. Loving Hearts Home Healthcare Inc. consistently received responses of “severe backlog” from the Virginia State Police. While making every reasonable attempt to receive the criminal records in a timely manner; Loving Hearts Home Healthcare Inc. cannot control how quickly the Virginia State Police conducts background checks, nor should the agency be held liable for the backlog that the Virginia State Police had at the time. Further, Loving Hearts Home Healthcare Inc. acted within its maximum capacity and abilities to maintain the criminal backgrounds checks by making every reasonable attempt to stay in constant communication with the Virginia State Police in an effort to be in compliance with §32.1-162.9:1 of the Code of Virginia and requirements of the Department of Medical Services. The record of communication with the Virginia State Police was included in the initial agency response and has been included in this Appeal for your

. The husband of the plaintiff file a petition to the court that his wife[plaintiff] is mentally ill and needs to have a court order directing the admission of her to the mental health hospital. The petition initiated by plaintiff’s husband is the order of the Wayne County probate court, and it is also appropriately certified by Doctors Wolodzko, who after appearing in her house and introducing himself as a doctor , and have a conversation with her in person that day and another day in telephone, determine that she is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and Smyk. The court gave the order and the Plaintiff was taken by ambulance from her home to a private psychiatric

The client?s wife asked him to seek help and made the appointment with a VA psychiatrist as well as myself (LCSW) and took him to his initial appointments.

The client’s mother referred her son to the agency because he was suffering from anxiety. He was resisting going to go to school and becoming distressed when his parents tried to leave him at home.