preview

Murakami's Argumentative Essay

Decent Essays

After reading the stories, it is reasonable that the narrator should be able to forgive himself for the death of his friend K. K. would’ve wanted it that way. “But the main reason I enjoyed spending time with K. was that he was such a sweet, pure-hearted boy,” (Murakami, 134). Some might argue, however, that he shouldn’t forgive himself. “Survivor guilt being perhaps the kind most familiar to us,” (Sherman, 153). Nevertheless, he should forgive himself because the guilt was tearing him apart from the inside. “I wake up in darkness, screaming, breathless, drenched in sweat,” (Murakami, 134). It wasn’t entirely the narrator’s fault that he couldn’t save the life of K. K. wasn’t paying any attention to the narrator when the wave was about to strike. “He might have been so absorbed in whatever it was he had found that my call made no impression on him,” (Murakami, 137). So, in a way, the narrator and K. equally share the blame. However though, the narrator could’ve done more. Instead of just shouting, he should’ve ran over to him, grasped his arm, and ran with him to safety. “K. heard my shouting and looked up. But it was too late,” (Murakami, 138). K. could’ve survived if the narrator had ran over to him. …show more content…

Think about it for a minute. Some people in a life or death situation can make bad choices. Then, if that choice accidentally hurts or kills someone, they are never the same. They think that if they did something different, nothing bad would’ve happened. But, what if they did something different and that was even worse? What if everyone would’ve been killed? Sometime these choices save more lives than we even know! Take Captain John Prior for instance. “‘I’m the one who placed the vehicles; I’m the one who set the security,” (Sherman, 156). If he hadn’t placed the vehicles or set the security, more lives could’ve been lost to enemy

Get Access