Nastia

Outline the legal entitlements of disabled children and young people and those with special educational needs.

The vulnerability requires special protection and care of children primarily from the state because of the failure of the parents or guardian in doing so. The transition of a child from the care of the parents/ guardian to the care of civil society/ government may turn out to be a time consuming ordeal accompanied with harsh experiences during this journey. The Juvenile Justice Act clearly specifies that the proceedings regarding the child in need of care and protection has ro take place in the child welfare committee, but nevertheless, during the pendency of the case, a child may have to face very many ranging from difficulties in being able to put across in words his atrocities and developing understanding about the new experiences of being

But children are a special case they cannot always stand up for themselves. They therefore need a special set of rights which take in to consideration their vulnerability and which ensures the adults that surround them take responsibly for their welfare, protection and development.

When the children are incapable, nurses have moral responsibility to assist parents in decision making in the children's best interest. "Substituting an adult judgement of what is in a child’s best interest is not necessarily equivalent with the child’s best interest (Coyne and Harder, 2011)." Acting in a child’s best interest requires parents and health professionals to take children's view seriously and give priority consideration to the impact of their decisions on children (Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children (CCRC). The adults have responsibilities towards their children to enable them in making decision but they do not have rights to make decision for their children (Lowden, 2002). Children should not be viewed as property. The first step in protecting the rights of children as outlined in the CRC is to view them as citizens (Van Daalen-Smith, 2010). When parents claim that the child belongs to them, they are establishing an ownership notion. Children should be respected as active contributor not as passive recipient of the health care (Maconochie and McNeill, 2010). Therefore, parental role in decision making for their children should be complementary not

There are actions taken within the courts and there is a sense of understanding that all decisions made regarding couples separating are to be done with the child as the focus- something which satisfies CROC. Unfortunately, as seen from above, the actual nature of protection of children in such situations is questionable ground and instead provides a more adequate than an exemplary form of

Children with disabilities are more likely to mistreated than any other children. After doing this term paper it really makes me think of how we can change these kid’s life in world. As a student studying Early Childhood Education it is important that this change starts at teachers. As teachers, we need to be more aware of the children we get. Need to be more aware of how we can better children education no matter the concerns or disabilities. It has been really eye opening for me to this assignment, seeing that the kids who are despite need of our love and help are not getting that. Clearly, children with disabilities in foster care are not getting the treatment and needs met that they should. Children are even getting misdiagnosed everywhere in the world so someone can gain more money. After reading my paper please consider someone of my questions. Why is money more important than children wellbeing and needs and wants to be meet? How was educator have we not done a better job helping these

Understandably, the welfare of children is a sensitive topic to many and a subject that it much more complicated than one person’s opinion. It seems like everyone has something to say about it and for good reason. However, with all the input, not all ideas will be the same. There are extremes and then there places in the ‘middle’ where opinions can fall. One of those opinions seems to be the most widely believed: parents have no right to give up their parental rights when they were the ones who decided to have them in the first place, except in extreme circumstances.

Each article describe or inform their opinion of why they feel that child neglect is wrong whether it is just simply telling you the statistics of the effect it have on the children or ways of preventing it from happening. Achieving knowledge about this important issue is very important you should know why this happen so we as a whole can make sure it does not happen again. With the knowledge we have and support we should be able to progress to overcoming the harmful effects of child abuse.

Key question raised in the court in regards to this appeal is the United Nations convention on the treatment of children which the country is in agreement with but such was not incorporated in the legal system as regards to detention and deportation of children. It has gone to exposes the lapses and eventually reinforce the need for children to be treated

getting the attention of the “caregiver.” As stated before by Bowlby, nevertheless he believes there should not be any form of “protest separation” by “the infant” (p. 250).

3 (1): “In all actions concerning children whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration” (“Canada Deports Children Without Considering their Best Interests”, par. 1). This convention is evidently significant in abiding with proper treatment and care of children. However, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act of Canada does not abide with that convention as it takes the child’s best interest only into account. There are various cases where the child is put in a high stress situation as a result of direct or indirect deportation. Such that, the child’s parent faces deportation and the child has the option of being deported with the parent or staying in Canada detached from the parent, or the child alone is facing deportation. Additionally, as an explicit example one can regard the situation a mother of four female children who faces deportation to a country where genital mutilation is enforced (“Canada Deports Children Without Considering their Best Interests”, par.10). The mother provides evidence that one of her daughters has a medical condition that could not be treated in their home country and the mutilation is very risky to her health. In this case that this family is deported, the children’s best interests were not taking into account. Henceforth,

The sole reason for the Safely Surrendered Baby law is to prevent child abandonment in infants, which can usually lead to death. Parents are known to also to commit neonaticide (the killing of a baby on the day of its birth) in other cases. This matter has made itself known through media, which makes it spread like wildfire; but the probable causes are never listed properly. The complexity of the arguments surrounding baby abandonment is also deepened by the multitude of cultures.

In her paper,” At Home with Down Syndrome and Gender”, Sophia Wong opens up by addressing the fact that she has a brother named Leo who has been diagnosed with down syndrome for the past thirty years. She mentions how her parents did not agree with the doctor's idea of having Leo be institutionalized. Instead her parents choose to look after Leo and give him a normal life despite his diagnosis. Throughout Leo’s life his family supported his goals and ambitions that he wanted for himself but deep down they knew the reality of it.

Full and absolute custody of the child upon birth, notwithstanding any congenital, physical or mental abnormality of the child, and all the decisions concerning the child’s health, in utero and after delivery, shall be made by intended parents. Therefore, it is vital for the medical and psychological evaluations and screening. They must also take into consideration the assumption of medical risks and releases. Furthermore, that all medical procedures have been thoroughly explained to them by the physician, and advised of the risks, including death, which may result from the conduct

Justice happens between two or more people because it is equality, and with equality you need another person to compare to in order to determine if the punishment or treatment is equal. The article presents a problem with justice but not in the way the author thinks. The author thinks that all of the children should receive protection and privacy rights then they reach justice, but that is not the case. In order to establish justice the state governments need to decide on one way to treat all children with the same problem. One group of children in receiving a clean slate while the other is not and that is the injustice. Once the governments come to a decision then all children need the same treatment and everyone has