1st Term Paper Our country was built and fought for over the theories of natural rights and personal freedoms. One of the only real reasons that we fought the British during the American Revolution was because we were devoid of these rights by the British king, George the 3rd. We were taxed heavily without representation by our own government and the theory that you cannot rule from afar. Soldiers were quartered in homes across the nation and you couldn’t buy tea without paying a tax. Our country was literally founded on the principles of natural rights and personal freedom. So, now to the issues at hand. Are our constitutional rights being violated by the fact that we have to go to school until you are sixteen? How about laws regarding …show more content…
I see how it could be deemed “necessary” for people to be able to have a quality education. Under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Section 1.8), I believe that Congress is allowed to do this act and is able to enforce it. People may see this and think it has nothing to do with education, but that was the point of the Founders. They were trying to avoid specific wording to avoid strict interpretation of the Constitution and so it wouldn’t be held to its every word. As Lawrence H. Tribe and Michael C. Dorf wrote, and using a quote from Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, “Where the framers…used general language, they [gave] latitude to those who would later interpret the instrument to make that language applicable to cases that the framers might not have foreseen.” (LHT and MCD, pg. …show more content…
If we are wanting our younger generations to eventually come up and take over the government, then we are going to need people who are educated to do so. Now, there are exceptions. Like the case of Yoder v. Wisconsin, an Amish man sued to the state of Wisconsin because the state was going to force his children to go to high school. They do have freedom of religion and therefore should be able to keep his kids out of school. This is one of those exceptions. I believe there should be court cases determining if your situation allows you to pull your kid from school. Like this one, they are allowed to because they only want their kid to live a simple farm life and not much other than that. This is therefore not constitutional and should be allowed by the people but with certain exemptions to this
Even though the Declaration of Independence does not mention education, our founding fathers did value education. Illustrated by the ordinances they passed “in 1785 and 1787 that granted federal lands to states to create and support public school- an institution that the nation’s founders viewed as essential to democracy and national unification.” (Jennings, p3) In 1959, the admission of Alaska and Hawaii into the Union reconfirmed the Federal government’s support of education. Three distinct elements that impact education are; laws that have been passed, the removal of the church from public schools, and the role of federal government that has evolved and changed over the years. These three factors have transformed education over the
Before America was America people fought a war where theoretically they should not have won. After the war ended, they came out victors, but at the price of losing thousands of men. “We are fallen into the most unhappy times, when even innocence itself is nowhere safe!” (Boston Gazette, February 1770). This excerpt shows that the people in the colonies were angry and wanted change. There was sufficient cause for the American colonists to take up arms and rebel against the British government because people have the right to privacy, and Britain was not giving it to them.
The rights and freedoms of Aboriginal people have changed significantly during the 20th century after facing many years of neglect and inequalities. In that time, change in indigenous rights and freedoms was brought about as a result of government policies, political activism and legal changes.
The American Revolution was founded on the notion that all men were created equal, and because of that no government could impede upon their inalienable rights. In the early 1700’s, British citizens emigrated to America in search of political, religious and socio-economic equality. England forced unjust taxes upon its former citizens, and, seeking justice, the colonists rebelled against their former homeland. The
After settling in America, colonists felt that their natural rights were being violated under British rule. This sparked their desire for self-government and independence from the British Empire. Under British rule, Parliament had the power to impose laws and taxes upon the colonies; many of the laws violated natural rights, and taxes were imposed despite the colonies not having representation in Parliament. These injustices encouraged colonists to fight for independence, basing their argument upon the philosophy of natural rights. Leaders of the colonies drafted the Declaration of Independence, which listed the many injustices and declared the colonies
All people are born with natural rights. But the case is different with britain, they have violated those rights, they make the colonies pay taxes. The colonists are mad that they have to pay taxes for a different government, no their own. The saying taxation without representation comes in here perfectly. Even though they are taxed, they don't have any say in government. This is an example of how their natural rights are violated. In the movie John Adams, it shows that the continental congress wanted to regain the rights of every man. They thought that natural rights should never be taken away. Also in Patrick Henry reading he says “give me liberty or give me death!”. This shows that he insists freedom, he states that the colonies need to get
In 1773 the United States as we know it was not yet born, however it was starting to take on a life in the minds of many Colonist. In that year the British Parliament enacted the Tea Act, which many of us know was the cause of the Boston tea party. What many Americans may not know is as a result of that the British Parliament enacted may more laws. Like the 1774 Coercive Acts which I found information about it on (historyplace.com) “the English Parliament passed the first of a series of Coercive Acts (called the Intolerable Acts by Americans) in response to the rebellion in Massachusetts.” This was done in hopes of keeping us in line with the British Crown. This also is what lead us Americans to start the Revolutionary war. The British King also tried in 1774 tried to take our guns right away by confiscating all the firearms and gun powder from individuals and from local governments. During the early years of your country while still under British law, we resisted the idea of someone taking away our rights to own a gun. Once word got out that the British forces were to confiscate the powder and firearms the people rose up and fought back. This would driver the people to create a new country The United States of America. On July 4th, 1776 we signed a Declaration of Independence this gave us the Constitution of the United States, which gave us new laws that were of the people by the people for the people. One of those laws was the Second Amendment the right to keep and bear
Our country was built heavily on liberty. We take liberty for granted, but the founders of our country actually didn’t. They, as colonists of the British colonies, were not given the liberty we now have. They had no representation in their government, and sometimes unfair laws toward them were passed without their opinion. A well-known act of Parliament, the Townshend Acts, was an important law in colonial times, and it partly led to the revolution of the United States of America.
Throughout the history of the United States there is no question that freedom from not only Britain, but themselves was of the utmost importance to many of the colonists. This was proven with numerous occurrences most notably, the Revolutionary War. However, in the aftermath of all of this was the question of government, and with the failing Articles of Confederation a convention was called, during which a debate over the rights of the citizens ensued. Federalists claimed all the powers of the new government were clearly listed. On the contrary the anti-federalists argued that this wasn’t the case and that it clearly be stated so the government could not violate them. Without the Bill of Rights the constitution offered no protection the citizens rights, this was a concern to not only the anti-federalists but many others. The Bill of Rights was specifically written as a check to the newly formed federal government, as previous experiences with Britain, and tyranny created concern in all of the colonists.
Ideological rationales where offered to garner Patriotic support to openly revolt against British rule in America. The ideological beliefs where based on the basic rights of man, which the Patriots believed the British monarchy and government where violating. These rights included that Americans should have the right to local autonomy, a government by consent, and that all mankind is born free and equal. That everyone is “equal” led to the belief that no one had a right to govern without the consent of those being governed, thus providing justification for the American Revolution (1765-1783). These arguments persisted, of course, even with the hypocrisy of the Founding Fathers who claimed “all men are created equal” even while providing justifications for racism and enslavement. For example, in Thomas Jefferson’s “Notes on the State
“The Revolutionary War marked the first time in history that a people fought for their independence in the name of certain universal principles such as rule of law, constitutional rights, and popular sovereignty.” (digitalhistory.uh.edu, 2015) Our constitutional rights, and Declaration of Independence, imposed many grievances with British rule. The grievance I chose to focus on is the one that focuses on justice. The King of Britain would not allow the courts of justice to be established. He constantly interfered and would not allow the colonies to judge their own criminals in a court of law established by the colonists. This interference was found unjust as The Revolutionary War continued. Freedom, itself, was challenged and the colonists simply elected not to be overthrown by a tyrant they had never met. In the end, these motivated and unified steps are what helped make the United States great. The United States will always deal with tyrants but in different terms and in different eras. I believe that it’s up to us to decide what is best for ourselves, our country, and our many generations to follow. Thanks to those that fought for us in the late 1800’s, we are able to make decisions that influence others, and ourselves alike, domestically and around the
When the British forced their way into the United States the King began creating absurd laws. According to the presentation "In 1774, leaders from the colonies met in Philadelphia to discuss British laws that they believed were unfair. They believed that Great Britain did not treat the colonists as equal citizens." Nobody was happy with any of the laws that the King forced upon the people of the colonies. If the colonies had a say in what the British authorities did or made laws on their own they would not be as miserable as they were at that time. Americans, as well as every person in the world should be able to be under a government by the people and for the people without anybody telling them what to
Why say people have rights when they can’t exercise it? When the British government abused the United States it showed that not even states as a whole doesn’t have rights anymore. In efforts to regain their rights back, the States decided to gang together to form their own new nation. The abuse the British government did towards the United States caused them to break away from their ruling and create their own constitution.The Declaration of Independence influenced the constitution by giving them the strength to needed to have their own independence, making sure their citizens have and know their rights, and for people to know they have their unalienable rights.
This report reviews and analyzes individual rights afforded by the constitution and their applicability to the suit for wrongful termination in the case of Korb versus Raytheon. The specific constitutional rights under review are the freedom of speech, freedom of information and challenges associated with employment law. Lawrence Korb, a former Assistant Secretary of Defense and current employee of Raytheon, a large equipment manufacturing company for the U.S. military was terminated after making public statements criticizing defense spending and calling for a reduction of Navy’s fleet. Raytheon, a manufacturer of
If this case came up before me in the Supreme Court I would rule that the high school can not ban students