Nature Vs Nurture Debate

Erickson’s psychosocial theory adds perspective to why identical twins, Linda and Lydia, turned out differently (Feldman 2010). Linda was raised by a family in the rural west, while Lydia went to a family in the urban south. These are two very different situations filled with different socioeconomical environments (Feldman 2010). The differences in the girls’ social environment could have had huge influence on their cognitive development (Feldman 2010). We need to analyze what Erickson’s psychosocial theory says about the way our social interactions with other people can test and outline our development (Feldman 2010). We can also take a look at the

The nature versus nurture debate is said to be one of the oldest, longstanding debates within psychology. This debate really sparks the interests of researching whether it is soley by nature (our genes or hereditary factors) or by nurture (our enivornment, relationships, teachings) that we become who we are or what influences us most.

The significance of nature and nurture has been a prolonged debate that has caused quite a controversy and the discoveries made on this topic have made harder to determine which side is the most crucial. Multiple experiments and research studies have been conducted to prove one is better or stronger than the other and they continue to be conducted. As a species, human beings inherited DNA from our ancestors, but what impacts our actions the most is our environment. The predetermined genes are impactful, but it is what one makes of it that shapes oneself. The path is driven by the human being. The way we carry ourselves out is affected by the choices we make, but the way we have evolved mentally comes from the nurturing of our caretakers.

According to GoodTherapy.org the definition of the nature versus nurture debate is, “the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture” (Nature Vs. Nurture Debate, 2015). For the purposes of this essay, “nature” will be defined as how history affects a person’s behavior, and “nurture” will be defined as how media culture affects a person’s behavior. This debate of nature versus nurture is an ongoing debate in the psychology field of study. In the literary works by Jason Zingsheim, “X-Men Evolution: Mutational Identity and Shifting Subjectivities,” and Evan Hayles Glendhill, “Superhuman Authority: Fascism and Bioethics in the X-Men Films,” they

Nature vs. nurture is a debate that stretches through all periods of time. Since the biblical era to now the issue is still widely debated and even more so relevant right now than it ever has been. It’s beginnings stem from the first great minds who wondered whether one’s genetics decided their psychology, or rather their environment. Essentially that is all nature vs. nurture is; whether a person’s thought process, actions, and behavior are determined by nature or nurture.

Do you ever wonder why you act? The nature vs nurture debate has been going for a long time and many people research about it. Nature needs to be noticed because it is important. Identical twins are different in many different ways. My personality has changed a lot over time. Studies show that nurture has more effect on your personality than nature. Nurture has more of an influence than nature.

The nature ( genes, biological and family factors ) versus nurture ( childhood, social and environmental factors ) debate is about the impact of an individual’s inborn characteristics as opposed to the experience from the surroundings they were brought up in, in deciding individual differences in physical and moral traits. The theory that people obtain all or most of their moral traits from social and environmental factors is also known as nurture.

Throughout time, nature and nurture have been examined to be two of the most essential topics to which the human was developed. However, the troublesome question that is asked is whether or not one has a more critical impact on human development. Before one can conclude if either is the key component of human development, one must first understand what both nature and nurture establish. While nature is characterized as the genetic makeup of a person through the inherited traits of one’s parents, nurture confronts the perception that adapting and changing to fit certain environmental factors form humans. Many theorists have brought into consideration their theories to demonstrate which approach resolves the question. Unfortunately, there is

Throughout history, philosophers, scientist and psychologists have always possessed different opinions on what gives humans distinct characteristics. “Nature”, includes heredity which is a biological component that is believed to affect IQ while “Nurture” is when one’s environment which shapes us through various experiences. Those who are inquisitive about life commonly reflect on their lives, wondering whether they would be different if their experiences in childhood were altered; childhood experiences or our social environment ever so greatly affects our personalities. Withstanding that, nurture has the ability to change an individual's characteristics based on social environment. However, the severity of these changes is different for each

Nature is genes and it contributes to personality. Anais and sam were twins and separated at birth, and their personality are quite the same; they are both spunky, dramatic,Creative careers, both of them talk with their hands. The Jim twins were separated at birth, but they are amazing alike, This is why they both had the same IQ, same jobs of Deputy sheriff and after that was woodworking, they had wives with the same name Linda and Betty. Twins half of the time has the same homasexality by genes. Marjorie and Jenna were both Religious.

Intelligence has been a cause of debate between psychological researchers for many years. This question of nature vs nurture can be examined in many ways. Although many psychologists argue for and against the nature nurture debate and agree that the many characteristics and personality traits are caused by nature and nurture both working together. Through the many developmental studies of famous researchers, it helps us assume that the influence of nurture outweighs that of nature. Plato and Aristotle, for instance, were both philosophers with different views on the issue. Plato believed that knowledge and behaviour were due to innate factors, meaning heredity, whilst Aristotle, also written by philosopher John Locke backed up the idea of tabula

The nature versus nurture debate has been a widely argued philosophical topic for numerous decades in which people hold strongly contrasting opinions. Many believe that a person’s development is solely down to their inherited (genetics) characteristics and tendencies, however, the opposing side consider the environment where you grew up to have a long-lasting effect or influence.

One of the oldest human development debate in psychology is nature vs. nurture. Some scientists believe that people are born with personality qualities that come from instinct, without the need to learn the trait (Rathus, 56). They are other scientists that believe ones personality is effected by his/her surroundings (Rathus, 56)

A child is born with many traits, but the environment they grow up in effects that. No child is exactly born dishonest or kind. Parenting styles and their type of punishment play a role in a child’s social behavior. Urie Bronfenbrenner argued with his ecological-systems approach that a person is affected by the systems around them such as school, economic patterns, and peers. If a child has permissive parents the child may think that yelling or stealing from others is acceptable because their parents never enforced rules at home, and then they carry that with them as they grow up. In Kathleen Berger’s textbook “Developing Person Through Childhood and Adolescence Eighth Edition” a study showed that “boys who were mistreated by their parents

Nature versus nurture is a psychology term related to whether heredity or the environment most impacts human psychological development (Huffman, 2012). Providing Dr. Money’s theory was much more difficult than people might realize. In many cases he was prove wrong with his theory in most children.