preview

Nature Vs. Nurture In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood

Decent Essays

Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood, is a portrayment of his personal view on the renown debate of nature vs nurture. Perry and Richard’s experiences and backgrounds are prime examples of how nature and nurture can influence one’s character. Capote recognizes “the nature-nurture debate is concerned with the relative contribution that both influences make to human behaviour” (Saul “Nature”). Capote portrays his stance on the debate through Perry and Richard's lives, and whether they are driven to murder because of nature or nurture. Capote creates Perry as a foil for Richard. In the novel, Capote shows sympathy for Perry when describing his life as a child. Perry endures a terrible childhood experience that continues to haunt him till his death. His mother leaves his family, his father is always moving them around, and two of his siblings commit suicide. These attributions are a key factor of how Perry turns out in the future and "these traits cannot be exposed without a mechanism that triggers these individuals to commit these horrific crimes" …show more content…

Capote believes that a person's background prompts violence, rather than by genetics. Even though both of his characters went after the Clutter family, Perry is the only one who murders them. Scientists are finding now that "some people, because of their genetic makeup and life experiences, are more sensitive to outside influences than others" (Rockoff "Nature"). Perry and Richard are each others opposites; both of them represent one side of the debate. Perry's traumatizing background has all the indications of pushing him towards criminality, and he is the one who kills the Clutters. On the other hand, Richard’s criminality is inborn. He is born with his violent ways; they do not develop because of traumatic experiences. In In Cold Blood, Capote applies the belief that a killer cannot be born, but needs to made by his or her personal

Get Access