preview

Negotiated Rule-Making Process

Decent Essays

Rules are established by specific agencies that work with those being controlled i.e. businesses and other organizations, individuals that are concerned by the existence or nonexistence of guidelines and those who are alarmed about detailed subjects like food safety regulations. Primarily in all cases or instances, an agency is directed to make a rule by Congress or a court order. There are times when a rule will be created in reply to a petition filed by an interest group, a group of individuals or a citizen who feels the need for change. Federal agencies are obligated to answer to all petitions for rulemakings within a certain period of time. Agencies have to take certain steps before implementing or issuing a proposed rule. There is information …show more content…

This is due to them having knowledge that they [the representatives] may not have when it comes to a certain topic. For instance, those individuals involved in the industry may be asked to estimate certain costs for a bid. Officials can be questioned about the procedure of the operational efforts when it comes to a program that they have to manage. Agencies can also sanctify the consulting process with those same involved parties by engaging in "negotiated rulemaking”. This negotiated rulemaking is to help move the interested parties into a state of compromise in order to develop a proposal that will be widely accepted. The Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990 summarizes the outline for this particular process. Congress sporadically commands its use when passing a …show more content…

For example, the Hill-Burton Act had language that specified that all communities and hospitals that were to receive federal grants and monies in order to expand their capacity would be required to provide a reasonable volume of services for “those that are unable to pay”. Since the amount did not advise exactly what reasonable was to be considered, it was the job of the executive branch to come up with those figures. That same amount may have been argued with the interest groups that were involved in assisting those without medical insurance. Because of the serious faults with this act, it did not meet the requirements of law and there was nothing in place to define reasonable which left the improvements undone until the early 1970s, almost 30 years after the

Get Access