preview

North Dakota Pipeline Analysis

Decent Essays

In North Dakota, oil is a great source of revenue. Since the oil boom, transporting that oil has been done through pipelines as well as rail cars. Recently, the Dakota Access pipeline has attracted attention from celebrities and other civilians that are not even residents of the Dakotas, such as Shailene Woodley, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jane Fonda, and Mark Ruffalo. Pipelines can be both efficient and dangerous. The efficiency can be read in the ability to transport the oil to other states, while the danger can be read in the environmental damage of an oil spill in a river that people depend on for water--in the case the Dakota Access pipeline could damage the Missouri River. No matter all the perks of a pipeline such as Dakota Access, it can be …show more content…

In Steven Mufson’s Washington Post article, “Showdown over N. Dakota Pipeline Provides Lesson in Power and Perils of Protest,” he writes that if the steel pipeline were to leak, it would leak into the Missouri River, which is the Sioux’s main drinking source. He also writes about how there have been evidence of serious leaks in recent years in other rivers such as Montana's Yellowstone River, Michigan's Kalamazoo River and man-made ponds in northern Alabama. Such an example was recently seen in Ash Coulee Creek in Belfield, North Dakota where only 150 miles from where they are protesting the pipeline, there was a massive oil leak, according to the article from UWIRE, “Nearly 200,000 Gallons of Oil Leaks 150 Miles from Standing Rock Protesters - Golden Gate …show more content…

Those for the pipeline say that it will help the economy, and that it will be much safer than transporting crude oil through rail cars. North Dakota oil producers will also get more revenue as a result. However, those against the pipeline say that even though it may be swell for the economy, it will not be swell for the environment. The gases that will be released from burning those gases from cars and other sources will help advance climate change, and is ultimately bad for the environment. If the United States just went to completely renewable energy, we could slow down the process. Also, it was planned that the pipeline be built and crossing under the Missouri River, which is the main water source for millions of people. Native Americans of the area--Sioux mainly--also have sacred grounds through where the pipeline was supposed to go through. The land was technically theirs in the treaty from the 1800s, but through deceit over the years, it has been taken from them. If the pipeline needs to be built, then it needs to be rerouted in order to protect the rights and environment of the

Get Access