The Power of a Scapegoat Authors often choose to use archetypes to ensure that readers can easily identify with, and relate to, the characters of a story. Using these universally known and accepted roles and figures, like the “villain”, “hero”, “mother figure”, or a “scapegoat” can be an effective technique to ensure the author’s message and theme of the story is both quickly and easily understood and accepted by the reader. A scapegoat is a person or group that is made to bear blame for others. Often times, the scapegoat is undeservedly punished or singled out, under the pretext of being done so for the greater good of a society. In both Ursula K. Le Guins “Those Who Walk Away From Omelas” and Shirley Jacksons “The Lottery”, we are presented …show more content…
Yet through the use of a scapegoat, the author guides the reader in the discovery of the ironies of this society’s morality. This theme is very effectively depicted by the contrast of something darker lying beneath the utopian city’s walls. Le Guin’s short story paints the scenery of a bustling yet quaint city, Omelas; a flourishing utopia filled with happiness. With summer festival approaching, the town is joyous. However, how do the citizen’s know they are happy? Philosophers will utilize the knowledge of one extreme to prove the existence of another. Le Guin employs this philosophical proof by depicting the citizens of Omelas finding certainty in their own happiness by experiencing the other extreme. Beneath the city lies a child; neglected and confined, the child begs to see daylight again. “I will be good,’ it says. ‘Please let me out, I will be good!’ Citizens visit, as if to prove their own happiness, yet “They never answer.” (599). All of the people of Omelas know the child is there. “In fact the whole concept of Omelas is said to depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.” (599) Almost all accept this fact and live happily in the contrast and comparison, knowing they have what it does not. There are those, however, who cannot accept these terms, the ones who walk away from …show more content…
The suffering of the child in Le Guin’s utopia is justified by the argument that Omelas would not exist without his presence. The author outlines these rules, “But they all understand that their happiness, the beauty of their city, the tender-ness of their friendships, the health of their children, even the abundance of their harvest and the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.”(599) The child’s sacrifice might be more meaningful than that of Tess Hutchinson, who merely plays part in tradition, however both scapegoats are crucial in demonstrating and prompting the reader to question to these themes. Accordingly, both Jackson and Le Guin emphasize their scapegoats as an archetype so readers can easily understand and relate to their respective characters. The reader is drawn to have more empathy with the scapegoat than the characters in its society. Would we have quickly looked past the brutal tradition of the lottery had it been a demonstrably evil man or convict? Would we not feel more empathy and question the child’s sacrifice if it were not a child, traditionally the most innocent of all
The short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, written by Ursula Le Guin, is about a so-called perfect society where the sacrifice of a child is what provides harmony, equality, and prosperity to the citizens of this city. As a reader, one is invited to create and visualize their own utopia, so that one is emerged with the reality of a moral dilemma: the happiness of many for the unhappiness of one. The symbol represented in the story reflects current and past society issues such as military sacrifice, slavery, and injustice.
In the short story “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin the theme is that in order to be truly happy, one must stand up for what’s right, even if it means leaving everything that they know. Society creates traditions and ways of thinking that are not easy for everyone to follow. In Omelas, the citizens have the choice to ignore the suffering of a child locked in a cellar, or leave the life and the city they are familiar with. The people of Omelas must ask themselves whether it is better for a child to suffer for the city’s happiness and wealth, or should the city suffer, just to give the child a shot at happiness? It is ironic because Omelas is a
As previously stated, the narrator is the one who describes and foreshadows the scapegoat use of the child. The narrator described a lack of guilt in Omelas which leads to the idea of scapegoatism. Once the narrator reveals the child and the harsh conditions in which it lives, the narrator also reveals uses of the child. In fact, the narrator makes the reader aware of the scapegoat by stating, “They all know it has to be there,” (252). After the narrator explains how the people of Omelas know the child has to remain in its tortured cellar, he/she explains that their city and its beauty depends on it (252). The depiction of needing the child for the ultimate happiness of the utopia basically describes using him/her as the person to blame. Basically, the child is giving the people of Omelas someone to blame for all the minor flaws, so that they can continue their happy life. Lastly, the narrator explains the theme of ignorance being bliss when he/she describes, “Some of them have come to see it, others are content merely to know it is there,” (252). Since the narrator tells the reader that not everyone goes to see the child, he/she is telling the audience that some choose to not see it. If they don’t see the child suffering then they can pretend it is not, and they can
An obsession exists in the world today based solely upon the use of scapegoats. According to the dictionary, a scapegoat consists of a person or group made to bear the blame for others or to suffer in their place. Some of the most influential scapegoats consist of Jesus Christ taking suffering for the sins of civilization, the Jewish population being punished for the problems in Germany, and more recently the U.S. citizens who perished in 9/11 being punished for the sins of America. Scapegoats have come in many forms over time and have been very destructive. The usage of scapegoats in our society, such as in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, has proved to be damaging, and an end must be found in order to find peace.
A scapegoat can be anything, a person, an object, or even a group of people. The idea of scapegoating has been prevalent in history for a very long time an example being Germany with the Nazis and using the Jews as their scapegoat for blaming the problems of society on. Scapegoats show a lot about a community and reveal a lot about how willing a group of people is to deal with there issues like in the short story the city of Omelas, this is also apparent in the lottery and the article “Muslims: The Modern day Jews?”
Alienation, starvation, neglect and abuse are all words that invoke unfavorable connotations and are treatments that no person would ever want to be subjected to. Living in those conditions is something that most people choose not to think about let alone witness with their own eyes. By not seeing it, they find it easier to pretend it doesn’t exist. In the short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” Ursula Le Guin writes about a city that from the outside looks like the perfect utopian society – a rich culture that is full of laughter, joy and peace, devoid of any violence, poverty or social inequities. Beneath the surface though hides a very dark secret that bares the true nature of Omelas. The citizens of this ostensibly flawless
Scapegoats are a recurring theme throughout stories and literature in all different cultures. The concept of scapegoats first appears in the Book of Leviticus, where a goat is left in a desert far away from society taking the sins of the community with it. In more recent works, a scapegoat is someone who has been blamed for wrongdoings or mistakes. In society and in literature, people in power scapegoat those with less power as a way to blame problems on one specific person or group. Usually, the person being blamed is not at fault for what they’re being accused of, however, the person or group scapegoating has chosen them because they are an easy target. The use of scapegoats has been around since the beginning of humanity and although it
In “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula Le Guin, the informally-speaking narrator depicts a cookie-cutter utopia with perpetually happy citizens that sing and dance in the music-filled streets during the Festival of Summer. However, under one of the beautiful public buildings lays a child, no older than ten years-old, who lays in its own excrement. Although the citizens know the emancipated child is there, they refuse to act upon the child’s suffering, for their happiness depends entirely on the child’s abominable misery. Through ethos, the narrator illustrates this utopian society with a casual tone and frequently asks the audience for their input. Le Guin’s fairy-tale introduction of the story establishes her credibility through her extensive knowledge and understanding of the people of Omelas. Le Guin utilizes logos through the narrator’s second person point of view which incites the audience to draw their own conclusions about the city of Omelas and question their own justifications of the child’s existence. The concept of the happiness of many relying on the necessary suffering of one forces the reader to question their own morals and their justifications for the child’s physical and mental condition. Through ethos, logos, and pathos, Le Guin presents the contrast and divide between the citizens of Omelas and the child in the cellar in order to challenge the reader’s capacity for moral self-conception.
In Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,'; we find ourselves faced with a moral dilemma. What is it that we as people base our happiness on? The idea of societal and personal happiness is played out through the analogy of Omelas and the abandoned child. In this story, we are drawn into Le Guin’s world by use of her vivid descriptions.
It has been present since the beginning of time. Misunderstanding and fear often leads to conditions where scapegoats are used. People don’t often seem to care about the complexities of the world around them. Instead they want easy answers to problems and a scapegoat is always a convenient out. In “The Lottery” we find that the ritual had become so mundane that Tessie Hutchinson had forgotten the lottery itself. She was late, felt the drawing was unfair because it was hurried and ultimately became the town’s scapegoat by virtue of the draw. As people move throughout life, hopefully they will remember that convenience is easy. Avoiding change and finding blame with anything is easy. It’s also just as easy to become a
In Omelas, Guin’s powerful line, “At times one of the adolescent girls or boys who go to see the child does not go home…they walk ahead into the darkness, and they do not come back,” conveys the impact of guilt and belief. The citizens who leave are convinced with themselves that they cannot be truly blissful living within a utopia that sacrifices the happiness of another child. Their wrongdoings had overtaken them, forcing them to leave utopia, and into darkness – proving that without ignorance, contentment is lost, transforming them into miserable
As the people of Omelas continued to accept the truth of their city, some have begun to see the child as more of an it than a person and regarded the child similar to a wild animal. “One of them may come in and kick the child to make it stand up. The others never come close, but peer in at it with frightened, disgusted eyes” (245). Not only do the residents accept the child’s misery, they have also
Ursula K. Le Guin’s short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” places readers in a perfect utopia that can be individually modeled toward perfection. Within the city of Omelas, all the various needs and wants are met and their lives are full of fulfillment and pleasure. But in the glory of this magnificent society, a darker secret rests at the foundation. In order for this perfect society to maintain its wonder a child must be placed in a dark room and be neglected, malnourished, and abused. The central moral problem rest about what an individual should do in this situation.
The true impact of discoveries examines whether they lead the individual to new perceptions of the world or new understandings of self. This isn’t expressed through the process, but instead through the aftermath of discovering. This notion is communicated in the text of ‘The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas’ by Ursula K. Le Guin. Citizens who walk away from Omelas have gained a new perception of the world and understanding of themselvses, as they are able to grasp the significance of the horrible treatment of the sacrificial child beneath the utopian city unlike the citizens who aren’t impacted by the discovery, choosing to ignore and neglect the existence of the child whose existence guaranteed their happiness. New understandings are developed
The utopian society fabricated by Ursula LeGuin in her short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” appears, before the reader is introduced to its one inherent imperfection, to be ideal to a point of disbelief. Even the narrator doubts that her account of this utopia, despite considering the allowances given to the reader to add or remove certain aspects of the society in an attempt to render a utopia fashioned to individual desire, is a believable one. Interestingly, it is not until one final detail of Omelas is revealed, that of the boy who is kept in isolation in wretched conditions so that the people of Omelas may recognize happiness, that the existence of the