preview

Of Scapegoat In Those Who Walk Away From Omelas And The Lottery

Good Essays

The Power of a Scapegoat Authors often choose to use archetypes to ensure that readers can easily identify with, and relate to, the characters of a story. Using these universally known and accepted roles and figures, like the “villain”, “hero”, “mother figure”, or a “scapegoat” can be an effective technique to ensure the author’s message and theme of the story is both quickly and easily understood and accepted by the reader. A scapegoat is a person or group that is made to bear blame for others. Often times, the scapegoat is undeservedly punished or singled out, under the pretext of being done so for the greater good of a society. In both Ursula K. Le Guins “Those Who Walk Away From Omelas” and Shirley Jacksons “The Lottery”, we are presented …show more content…

Yet through the use of a scapegoat, the author guides the reader in the discovery of the ironies of this society’s morality. This theme is very effectively depicted by the contrast of something darker lying beneath the utopian city’s walls. Le Guin’s short story paints the scenery of a bustling yet quaint city, Omelas; a flourishing utopia filled with happiness. With summer festival approaching, the town is joyous. However, how do the citizen’s know they are happy? Philosophers will utilize the knowledge of one extreme to prove the existence of another. Le Guin employs this philosophical proof by depicting the citizens of Omelas finding certainty in their own happiness by experiencing the other extreme. Beneath the city lies a child; neglected and confined, the child begs to see daylight again. “I will be good,’ it says. ‘Please let me out, I will be good!’ Citizens visit, as if to prove their own happiness, yet “They never answer.” (599). All of the people of Omelas know the child is there. “In fact the whole concept of Omelas is said to depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.” (599) Almost all accept this fact and live happily in the contrast and comparison, knowing they have what it does not. There are those, however, who cannot accept these terms, the ones who walk away from …show more content…

The suffering of the child in Le Guin’s utopia is justified by the argument that Omelas would not exist without his presence. The author outlines these rules, “But they all understand that their happiness, the beauty of their city, the tender-ness of their friendships, the health of their children, even the abundance of their harvest and the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.”(599) The child’s sacrifice might be more meaningful than that of Tess Hutchinson, who merely plays part in tradition, however both scapegoats are crucial in demonstrating and prompting the reader to question to these themes. Accordingly, both Jackson and Le Guin emphasize their scapegoats as an archetype so readers can easily understand and relate to their respective characters. The reader is drawn to have more empathy with the scapegoat than the characters in its society. Would we have quickly looked past the brutal tradition of the lottery had it been a demonstrably evil man or convict? Would we not feel more empathy and question the child’s sacrifice if it were not a child, traditionally the most innocent of all

Get Access