Offending Behavior Today : An Important Role That Is Played By Psychological Theories

A serial killer is traditional defined as the separate killings of three or more people by an individual over a certain period of time, usually with breaks between the murders. (Angela Pilson, p. 2, 2011) This definition has been accepted by both the police and academics and therefore provides a useful frame of reference (Kevin Haggerty, p.1, 2009). The paper will seek to provide the readers with an explanation of how serial killers came to be and how they are portrayed in the media.

In the article The Serial Killer Phenomenon Richard Whittington-Egan aims to explain what exactly a serial killer is and how they differ from a mass murderer. Whittington-Egan breaks down and showcases the defining characteristics of a serial kill with the help of numerous cases of evidence to confirm the accuracy of each statement. The article concludes with examining the future of this phenomenon, what has been done, and most importantly how difficult it will be to solve such an unpredictable behavior.

Correspondingly, in the published book “Deterrence and the Death Penalty”, the committee on deterrence and the death penalty presents research organized on the effects of homicide rates due to the death penalty. The author's research specifies that capital punishment neither increases, deters or has any effect on the numeral rates of homicide. This is important due to the fact that even 30 years

Throughout American history, many have tried to identify how the human mind operates. Most have come up with a solution different from the last. This paper will focus on what effects homicide rates such as prejudices, law, morals, and, in general, upraising. The three areas focused on are religion, socioeconomic structure, and culture. Each may be widely varied, but at the same time quite connected. The idea is to show how each of these statuses can affect an individuals’ mind to commit homicide. Furthermore, we shall see how each of the above affects and individual’s mind on how they perceive the acceptability of homicide.

Abstract There are many times in the world today where evil will bear its ugly face. Society has to prepare itself for such a battle with evil when the time comes. All too often when one confronts an evil situation, there tends to be bloodshed. This paper will attempt to explain what excusable homicide is and how it is utilized in the world today.

In conclusion, it has been demonstrated the social construction of the lawful and unlawful homicide by using the actions of the police officers in two different cases. In the Mark Duggan case, the lawfulness of the homicide was demonstrated by police officer complying with the theoretical outlooks of Beccaria and Durkheim (Williams, 2012). Protecting the people and their cultural biases, applying the punishment that straightens the social bonds as well as following laws and legislations despite of unwanted reaction in from of riots portray Mark Duggan’s killing as a lawful homicide (IPCC (a), 2015). However, if laws and legislations were not followed and actions were not aimed to protect people which led to a break in social bonds the reasonable

The two types of criminal behaviors are justifiable homicide and excusable homicides (Schmalleger, 2002). Justifiable manslaughter incorporates the execution of a sentenced guilty party by a court arrange or the killing of an opponent by a military in the line of obligation. An excusable homicide, as a rule, includes the unintentional or non-careless killing of another person. This implies there is no proof to demonstrate the convict had aimed to kill the victim. So there is no confirmation of wrongful or imprudence with respect to the individual that is sentenced (Schmalleger, 2002). Be that as it may, criminal crime is legitimately isolated from two types of murder and manslaughter. All things considered, there are two contemplations that

In this article, I was surprised that juveniles accounted for 16% of all violent crime. Also, of all juveniles murdered in 2008, 38% were younger than age 5. Furthermore, in 2008, 67% of all murder victims were killed with a firearm. Lastly, the most common method of murdering children younger than age 5 was by physical

In the year of 2011, the estimation of murders in the nation was well over 14,000. According to the FBI’s UCR, this was said to a decrease of about 0.7% when compared to the estimations of the year 2010, almost 15% (14.7%) decrease from the year 2007, and a decrease of about 10% from the year of 2002. (UCR, 2011)

Homicide is regarded by our society as one the most serious crimes, thus the appropriateness of the assessment of criminal responsibility is especially important. In Western Australia, the homicide offences are contained in the Western Australian Criminal Code. In 2008, following the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission of Western Australia (LRCWA), there were significant amendments to the Code, especially relating to the murder offences. Presently, the offence of murder is found in section 279 of the Code and details three forms of murder. Of these, sections 279(1)(b) and 279(1)(c) express a test of 'likely to endanger life' to establish criminal responsibility. It is therefore crucial to understand and analyse the term

In article “Murder Isn’t a Nationwide Problem”, John R. Lott, Jr., does not struggle to layout the statistics that prove to us, the audience, that murder really isn’t a nationwide problem and that killings only take place in some places. In fact, the last sentence he states is: “To put it simply, murder isn’t a nationwide problem; it’s a problem in a very small set of urban areas”. Throughout the article, Lott, Jr. gives us many statistics saying the murders and the population in these “urban areas”.

The relationship between offending and victimization is one in the same according to the feminist pathways theory. When researchers compared the status offenses of girls and boys, girls where more likely to receive more stringent punishment for offenses such as; running away, truancy, and being out of control. In the past, girls and young women were treated like criminals and disregarded as victims due to sexual double standards.

. No one know that why murder rates are increasing and not reducing. Such as police officers are less aggressive toward of criminal and do not take a serious an action against a criminal or failed to find a criminal in certain time of period and a criminal commit more crimes and murders in a society. On the other hand, those who are earning less and can’t effort daily life needs is also a sign of increasing crimes in societies and in communities. They can’t effort what they need or their family needs so those kinds of people start plundering, street crimes and even murder to gain their goals and money to support themselves and their families. Such as this kind of problems is headache for societies and for communities. The figure and stability

Crime is one of the most important social issue societies currently face. It is a very important issue that continues to erode our culture both economically and morally. Crime is globalized; criminals often come from all segments of society with some believing that violence is an appropriate response to dealing with conflict in their lives. Often the justice system is responsible for addressing such issues. Due to the severity of violent crimes, such acts are generally treated more seriously by courts and prosecuting attorneys than other classes of crime. One of the most important types of crime is murder and more specifically serial murder. There have been cases where individuals have committed horrendous acts as a form of gaining self-indulgence.

Society today is comprised of many different races, ethnicities and minds that think differently and similarly on various topics. The interpretation of homicide is a topic that may be considered to be a universally accepted social more. A common misconception of homicide is that it is used similarly to murder but homicide is general in scope than murder. Murder is a form of homicide that constitutes a criminal act. There are also other forms of homicide that do not comprise of criminal acts. Homicides of this nature are regarded as justifiable or excusable. An example of a justifiable homicide is when an individual is in peril they may out of self-defence