preview

Old Enough: Civil Liberties In The United States

Better Essays

Michael Dick Professor Woodring English 100 16 NOV 2014 Old Enough The legal age limit to have full legal liberties in America should be eighteen and not twenty one. If one is able to serve their country in the military and fight in a foreign land, legally marry another adult individual, and smoke cigarettes, then they should also be able to legally consume alcohol, own a hand gun, rent a car, and gamble at the age of eighteen. These legal liberties are granted according to age and not one’s intellectual capacity or maturity to make a sound decision. If one has sound judgment and realizes that they will be held legally accountable for their actions then the age should not restrict privileges. Therefore, if one is enlisted to defend their country …show more content…

Gambling is a form of recreation that should be available to all adults over eighteen, not just those adults over twenty-one. If one makes a bad decision to gamble away all their money, it should be based on the individual, no matter what the age. If one makes the conscious decision to loose all their money during a game then they should be able to make that decision as an eighteen year old adult. In fact, according to Lovitt, when one becomes twenty-one they are afforded the right to gamble. (pg 1) The right to be afforded the liberty to gamble should be awarded at age eighteen versus twenty-one because it does not ensure one will make the right decision; it is only the right to decide. One should also be able to legally consume alcohol at the age of eighteen, because they are an adult according to the courts, and if they are held liable for their actions they should be able to consume alcohol. Alcohol can be used as a form of stress relief, but if one cannot control their intake then they may get into trouble. One could also say that alcohol is social mechanism for college or other type students. If the consumption of alcohol is abused, for either stress relief or social interaction, then one should be held liable for their actions. (Lovitt, pg …show more content…

So, if one commits a crime, even alcohol related, they are held liable for a bad decision, even at the age of eighteen. Therefore, one should be able to consume alcohol at eighteen because they are going to be held legally liable for a bad decision by the courts. In fact, according to Koch, “mature drivers, (no age given twenty-one or eighteen), with a blood alcohol rate of .08 or .09 level of intoxication are eleven times more likely to be in a fatal accident”. (Koch, pg 4) Does this warrant raising the legal age to drive to twenty-one or eighteen? This point is proof that one will be held liable for the bad decision, but at 18 they should be afforded the right to choose to consume alcohol. The twenty-sixth amendment describes how one is able to serve in the military and do other things such as smoke at the age of eighteen. Therefore one should also be able to consume alcohol and own a hand gun at this age too. (Maddex, Amendments, pg 2) In Fact, according to Maddex, this amendment “followed a campaign that stressed the fact that if eighteen year old individuals were old enough to be drafted then they were also old enough to vote”. This amendment was one of many “that was a check and balance of the Constitution”, according to the Constitutional Amendments article edited by Tarr & Connor (pg

Get Access