Oryx And Crake Analysis

The contrast of people’s mentality in comparison to one’s economic standing is displayed frequently in Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, through particular character’s morals.

The book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is often associated with a various number of themes such as racism, social inequality, the importance of family values, and much more. But one of the more hidden messages of the book centers around the idea that there is a coexistence of good and evil. This theme is really brought to life the more the reader is able to understand the book. Through sub themes such as coming of age, perspective, and intense characterization of many important characters the idea of good and evil is really brought to light.

In “Barn Burning,” the author, William Faulkner, composes a wonderful story about a poor boy who lives in anxiety, despair, and fear. He introduces us to Colonel Satoris Snopes, or Sarty, a boy who is mature beyond his years. Due to the harsh circumstances of life, Sarty must choose between justice and his family. At a tender age of ten, Sarty starts to believe his integrity will help him make the right choices. His loyalty to family doesn’t allow for him to understand why he warns the De Spain family at such a young age. Faulkner describes how the Snopes family is emotionally conflicted due to Abner’s insecurities, how consequences of a father’s actions can change their lives, and how those choices make Sarty begin his coming of age into

It seems that throughout the novel there is an extended metaphor of Snowman as various figures from the Christian bible. The first figure that Snowman can be said to represent is that of Adam, the first man, though the similarities between the two characters do not follow the same chronology. Just as Adam is given the animals as companions to look over, similarly Crake has ensured that the Crakers and Jimmy are both left

What it Means to Kill a Mocking Bird: an in depth analysis of the morals in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird

Being at the top of the social hierarchy has been a must for every American of past generations, but can lead to fatal damages for some trying to obtain that goal and a cause to ruin people’s lives. In a remarkably triumphant story on compassion, Harper Lee explored the horrors of racial prejudice in the novel “To Kill a Mockingbird.” Set in the 1930’s, the poor town of Maycomb, Alabama has been hit by the depression hard, which created a vast, complex social pyramid, with distinct families and lifestyles. At the Finch household, composed of a little nine year old girl, Scout, a twelve year old boy Jem, and their father Atticus, proceed through a whirlwind of events throughout the next few years. Atticus, a lawyer who is a hardworking, honest man at the top of the social hierarchy of Maycomb, has to defend a colored man by the name of Tom Robinson. This happened to be very unusual for the time period, as the family has to transcend through the struggles in a racial prejudice town and learn the raw nature of the worst in humans, thus trying to overcome these events through compassion. The author utilizes metaphor, characterization, and mood to describe the situation of Maycomb, it soon then becomes very clear that the dangers of ruining innocence can lead to a vast road of horrors and evils.

The

Joan Didion uses rhetorical words in “Morality,” to emphasize her claim as to why she is suspicion of the definition of morality. Throughout, “Morality,” Didion defines and provides varies arguments as to why she is skeptical towards moral principles. Didion starts her essay by describing her location to present an emotional appeal to her particular setting. “As it happens I am in Death Valley, in a room at the Enterprise Motel and Trailer Park, and it is July, and it is hot (106, para 1).” The significance of describing the setting helps the reader become aware of the authors hidden meanings around the individual location, time, and weather. The tone of the setting described by Didion evokes emotions of isolation, despair, and loneliness.

The

Only a few beings exist as a mockingbird. Mockingbirds exist only for the enjoyment of others; they make other people’s lives brighter. Though in To Kill a Mockingbird Tom Robinson’s character does not hold prominence, he displays many honorable attributes. These qualities define him as a mockingbird. In this story, he enters as a desperate defendant battling for his life. Throughout the trial, however, he still exemplifies a few different, respectable traits. Even before the trial, he displayed a solid work ethic and a courtesy that one cannot deny. His truthfulness, respectfulness, and hard-working attitude make him a reputable character in this story. Permeating his struggle for justice, these characteristics shine through.

In the third chapter of Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird Atticus proclaims that “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view . . . until you climb into his skin and walk around in it” (P. 39). By including this statement Lee presents to us the idea of empathy and that, in the words of author Madeleine L’Engle in her book A Wrinkle in Time, ‘people are more than just the way they look’. Applying this concept to some of Lee’s characters in the book can teach us invaluable

Throughout Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, the reader surveys multiple personalities of different characters mentioned. These personalities vary greatly in meaning. In the novel, Lee has emphasized the importance of Atticus. The reader can deduce Atticus’ significance from the emphasis of his loyalty to his work and his family. Furthermore, with evidence of Atticus’ perseverance and experience, the audience can come to the conclusion that Atticus plays a crucial role in clarifying the meaning of the novel.

Socrates once said, “The only good is knowledge, and the only evil is ignorance.” While knowledge can be justifiably good through the use of learning how to help others, it can also be horribly dangerous. Society nowadays uses knowledge to classify the people who are worthy of greatness and those who are not. It is in these classifications that the state of human relationships is greatly tested because of inequality. In Margaret Atwood’s novel, Oryx and Crake, two of the main themes are academic importance and the state of human relationships. In the culture that Atwood creates, if an individual does not possess the proper intellect that measures up to societies standards, that individual will be ostracized and deemed worthless, and their social life will

This novel illustrates the life story of Snowman, also known as Jimmy, who is the only human left on earth after a breakthrough of a viral disease which abolishes numerous people. Snowman spends his time in the wilderness reflecting and grieving over his friends and family who die as a result of the lethal disease that Crake, his best friend, deliberately spread. Crake is described as an astute character with a passion for science and technology, and he eventually comes up with the Blysspuss Pills which are designed to diminish aging, protect against sexually transmitted diseases, and grant the user “sexual powers”. While waiting for Oryx, Crake’s partner, to return from the pizza store, Jimmy receives a phone call from her, “It was in the pills. It was in those pills I was giving away, the ones I was selling. It’s all the same cities, I went there. Those pills were supposed to help people…” (Atwood 389). The pills were assumed to have many advantages, however, they induced hysteria as the user acquired a fatal disease which spread internationally. This plague resulted in frantic behavior as, everyone desperately wished to be spared from it. Upon reading this novel, I believe that Crake represents God as, he created a new and “improved” species of humans, Crakers, to terminate the

Vancil first illustrates how this book is unlike any other that Ernest Gaines has written; it took him ten years to write it and is argued to be his best novel to this day. In the novel, Vancil recognizes how Gaines utilizes the first person point of view to share the narrative. With this, Vancil claims that since Grant Wiggins, the narrator, is not naive but yet mindful and judgemental, then therefore his tone is often ironic. Vancil then continues his theory about irony and establishes that in conclusion, the readers are able to connect with the characters while at the same time not get too close in order to maintain a clear vision of the moral part of the story.