Overpaid Athletes

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

What comes witht that is paychecks. A lot of people get paychecks and think it is okay to spend it on whatever they want when they want. In some ways that it is okay but in a lot of ways it is not. This is a very global issue that us people need to try and change. What the people need to learn as well as the college athletes is, they need to know how to manage their money. So by paying college athletes, things they can learn from the money is not to spend it on everything and show them how life will be after college so they do not come into their next chapter not knowing what to do. Also what paying college athletes will do is make the NCAA even more competitive than it is today. Paying student athletes will more NCAA more competitive because when money is involved with college, people will want to start attending college to play and a sport.

Paying college athletes would be good for students, they wouldn't have to be worrying about anything. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need. If you're willing to help student athletes in college help me make a difference in the world and make these college athletes have a nice time In college by not having to worry to be paying stuff on

The Final Four generated, alone 1.3 million dollars” (Goldman). Paying athletes could also help them after college. If they don’t end up going pro they still will be in less debt. This could help there career after college which is a big step in life. Also more money can let them get healthier food and stay healthier. Plus health is a key part in success.

College sports is a multi-billion dollar industry. Each year thousands of high school students are recruited to play college sports, but under strict conditions. Students are required to do well in athletics while keeping up with their academics. College athletes spend up to forty five hours per week on practices, training, and games. In addition, they spend roughly forty hours on their academics. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletics Association) does not think it is necessary to pay these athletes because they want to maintain the “amateur sport” status. According to Stanley Eitzen in his “College Athletes should be Paid, “The universities and the NCAA claim their athletes in big-time sports programs

With the universities pulling in more than twelve billion dollars, the rate of growth for college athletics surpasses companies like McDonalds and Chevron (Finkel, 2013). The athletes claim they are making all the money, but do not see a dime of this revenue. The age-old notion that the collegiate athletes are amateurs and students, binds them into not being paid by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). This pay for play discussion has been talked about since the early 1900s but recently large steps are being made to actually make a change. There are many perspectives on the payment of collegiate student athletes coming from the NCAA, the athletes themselves, and the university officials.

If the student-athletes are paid a salary, in addition to receiving a scholarship, which includes, tuition, books, housing and meals, it would be grossly unfair to non-student-athletes because tuition costs would be increased dramatically and ultimately be unattainable for the non-student-athlete. Without reasonable tuition costs, less students will attend and in turn this loss of

Student athletes should not be paid. A misconception is that all athletic programs in the NCAA make head-over-toe profit. There are three divisions of intercollegiate athletics, and frankly division three athletic programs don’t make as much or have a profit when compared to division one programs. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue”. (Paying College Athletes) The truth is only a fraction of athletic programs are actually profitable, while most pose a cost to the institution. The question arises primarily in division one programs and typically in the sports of basketball and football. The argument is made that these institutions receive millions of dollars from their student athletes’ performance, in return they should be paid.

Some may say student – athletes have it easy because they get to go to school for free and live the life of a college athlete when that is not the case in most situations. College athletes are in the business of marketing at a young age without playing professional sports which is a business. Which is why I believe student – athletes should be paid to play college sports. My reasons for this argument are that the student athlete may need spending money and money to support their families, secondly the schools along with their sport profits off of the students athletes names, and lastly for big events some student athletes are required to miss schools due to these events.

Paying college athletes would bring more college athletes to play sports because they won’t have to worry about graduating with a ton of debt. Also, athletes that get paid money try

Because of this, they say it would provide an unfair advantage to the other students if these athletes get both a free education as well as get paid at the same time to play a sport (Yankah). Others say that they are just kids and do not need that kind of financial pressure at such a young age. Furthermore, athletes should not be paid because there just is not enough money in the school, and there would be an uneven pay between sports based on general revenue (time). People even say that if the NCAA were to pay athletes, it would take away from the importance of an education and these players would not take their education seriously(lemmons). All these reasons and much more support why college athletes should NOT be paid.

Some may say that paying college athletes is a poor idea considering they have the reputation for being cheaters or only interested in what they want. “...The argument against allowing pay to student athletes arises mainly from greed and self-interest” (Text 1 lines 41-42). Regardless this is not always the case as some students need money and that the greedy ones are actually the coaches. Scholarships can be taken away, forcing students to look for jobs and struggle to find a balance between school and work. Last, The NCAA has an awful reputation for going against the law and not giving financial assistance to students for impractical reasons. It should be noted that by these reasons athletes should be paid for their participation in sports.

If student-athletes get paid, they will stay in school longer and get a degree, then move on to a higher level of athletic competition. Also paying college athletes will help them pay for bill and it will not pressure them to leave school

So, if colleges pay their athletes, more students will be interested in playing different sports. As a result, there will be more students who will fit and healthy due to the rigorous training and recommended diet that comes with the trainings players will undergo. Many athletes are motivated to work hard so they can be the best in their chosen sports, but it can’t be argued that money can also be a great motivator. If college athletes get paid, existing players can be inspired to worker harder so they can retain their

College sports are big business. For many universities, the athletic program serves as a cash-generating machine. Exploited athletes generate millions of dollars for the NCAA and their schools, and never see a dime. In terms of profit, if all ties with the university were eliminated, an athletic program acting as its own separate entity could compete with some fortune 500 companies. So, why do the vital pieces of the machine, the players, fail to receive any compensation for their performance? The answer lies in the money-hungry NCAA and their practice of hoarding all the revenue. College athletes should receive payment for their play to make their college experience more bearable because they create huge profits and