When analyzing The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, Hamlet, and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, many different themes can easily be identified that connect all three texts. The theme that is being investigated in this essay concentrates on perspective. Not only does perspective relate to these texts specifically, but perspective is a huge part of reality. The way that each individual interprets an object can vary enormously, but in the end the object is always the same. The reason individuals can interpret the same thing differently is due to their perspective. One may “Look on every exit as being an entrance somewhere else” (Stoppard 28), while the other only sees a way to escape, but in the end it's just a door. The theme “two different …show more content…
It is clear that the ghost throughout the play is nonexistent due to the fact that he has already been killed, and thus, not living. After Hamlet’s death it can also be concluded that he was at that point not existing, but it can also be proven that while Hamlet was still living he didn’t really exist. Again, the definition of existence is having objective reality, which is the understanding of how things really are. Throughout the play, there were scenes where it could be argued whether or not Hamlet was sane or insane, but by using clear examples of his transfers between sanity and insanity, it can be concluded that if Hamlet’s sanity is forever changing, then his judgement is being skewed and therefore he can’t exist if he cannot determine how things really are. If his degrees of sanity aren’t taken into play, we can see the two perspectives inside of Hamlet’s brain. His choice between revenging his father’s death and just killing him always end with Claudius dead and in the end nonexistent. An even stronger argument about Hamlet’s existence is that many of his soliloquies happen when he is sane, and in those he contemplates suicide, which would make him nonexistent. In Act One of Hamlet, after his father’s funeral and Claudius’ wedding, Hamlet is sane, yet even this early into the play he is …show more content…
That it should come to this! (Shakespeare 1.2.129-159) In this text Hamlet questions why suicide is a sin in God’s eyes and compares life to a garden full of weeds (Shakespeare and Crowther). He feels like his life is pointless and questions why he should live when nothing in his life is going right. It can then be concluded that when Hamlet is clearly insane he can’t exist, because he doesn’t have objective reality which is necessary to exist, and when he is sane he doesn’t want to exist which is clearly expressed in his dialogue above. With the final scene of the play ending with all but one character dead, it stands true that his play does in fact end as The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead due to the fact that their perspectives ending the same, with no one existing. Through Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, the perspectives of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern contrast with the actors watching them, but their outcomes are the same. Although both groups are in a play, only the other actors make that realization. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern on the other hand, are oblivious to their nonexistence. GUIL. What’s the first thing you
Shakespeare fancies the application of ghosts in his plays, Hamlet is no exception. Scholars argue that the ghost in Hamlet is only a figment of Hamlet’s imagination, but how does that explain others witnessing the apparition. Hamlet’s mental state is declining throughout the play, but what is the true cause? From an external view Hamlet appears insane, whether or not he is insane is left ambiguous. If he is insane, is the traumatic loss of his father causing Hamlet to see a ghost or is the ghost real indeed?
The Ghost’s appearance troubles Hamlet again in a different way at the end of Act Two, when Hamlet questions whether or not the apparition he has seen is really the ghost of his father. He believes that it is likely that what he saw was really an evil spirit trying to trick him into sinning, for, as he says, “the devil hath power / T’assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps…abuses me to damn me” (2.2.628-32). His concern is legitimate; however, it causes him to delay further due to his worries about sin and what could happen to him should he decide to take action if the Ghost is in fact evil. When Hamlet attempts to work himself into a frenzy by insulting himself and climactically cursing Claudius with caustic epithets, he is incapable of maintaining his emotion and he orders his brains to turn about, bringing himself back down to logic and reason. He feels that he cannot act without some sort of proof of the truth of what the Ghost has said, and therefore he arranges to “catch the conscience
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are foils to Hamlet. The two are introduced as friends to Hamlet. But also they are like messengers for the king. Hamlet learns of their
In the play by William Shakespeare, the ghost of King Hamlet approaches his mourning and depressed son, Hamlet, who is still affected by his death. The ghost explains to Hamlet how he died and demands that Hamlet avenge his death. Note how the ghost approaches Hamlet when he’s the weakest and still mourning to persuade and manipulate him into taking revenge for him. In Act one Scene 5 the ghost states, “If thou didst ever thy dear father love-/ Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder.” The way King Hamlet words his request is more as a challenge; in which Hamlet’s love for his dead father can only be proven by carrying out whatever his father wishes. The ghost influences most Hamlet’s behavior, which not only affects the plot, but also the relationships with other characters. The ghost influences the relationship between Hamlet and his mother, Gertrude. He becomes angry at Gertrude because of her fast marriage with his uncle Claudius. Through the use of innuendos, antic disposition, and metamorphic plays, Hamlet makes it his duty to get King Claudius back for killing his father. Hamlet agreed to avenge his father without second thought. As the play advances, Hamlet begins to doubt the apparition. In act 3 Hamlet begins to have second thoughts and states, “The spirit that I have seen/ May be a devil…” This shows Hamlet’s inner conflict between listening to his father and avenging his death or following his ethics. To be sure that Claudius
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has been performed thousands of times since it was “written in 1599–1601 and published in a quarto edition in 1603” (Britannica.com). It’s popularity stems from its themes that translate across time. These themes, are seen to be relatable even to this day with the ever growing audience. Readers and viewers are able to find similarities between the current state and or even relate to one of the characters or events taking place over the course of Shakespeare’s five act masterpiece. Shakespeare's, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark remains a viable text for contemporary readers in that it functions as a mirror.
Throughout the course of the play, Hamlet is also obsessed with the mystery of death. In the beginning of the play, he states that he is unsure where one ends up after they die. Later into the play, he makes a reference to the afterlife contradicting his first approach. When he attempts to kill
In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, suicide is an important and continuous theme throughout the play. Hamlet is the main character who contemplates the thought of suicide many different times throughout the play, since the murder of his father. Hamlet weighs the advantages of leaving his miserable life with the living, for possibly a better but unknown life with the dead. Hamlet seriously contemplates suicide, but decides against it, mainly because it is a mortal sin against God. Hamlet continues to say that most of humanity would commit suicide and escape the hardships of life, but do not because they are unsure of what awaits them in the after life. Hamlet throughout the play is continually tormented by his fathers death and his
In the first Act in the play, Hamlet is the last person to see his deceased father. Granted, Hamlet is the only one to speak to the ghost and he is by himself when he does, but the guards and even Horatio, “Before (his) God, (he) might not this believe. . . Without the sensible and true avouch. . . Of (his) eyes. (Act I Scene I Lines 56-8)” serve as witnesses that there is indeed a ghost and it is not just a figment of Hamlet’s imagination.
“There is no truth. There is only perception.” a knowledgeable quote by French novelist, Gustave Flaubert, discussing how humans perceive things versus reality. Perception is how one interprets the world and its individuals through their own knowledge and experiences; therefore, there is a diverse amount of viewpoints on the same subjects and people. As a result, those who are capable of perceiving situations accomplish more than those who are incapable. In Hamlet, William Shakespeare develops the theme that those who are incapable of perceiving others leads to punishment, however, those who successfully perceive are rewarded. This theme can be proven through three major characters: Claudius, the main antagonist, Gertrude, the mother of the main character, and Hamlet, the main character. These characters portray both successful and failed attempts of perception throughout the play.
Shakespeare's Hamlet gives us the character Hamlet and shows us his descent into madness following the death of his father; he contemplates suicide, is cruel and calculating ignoring the feelings of others in his goal of avenging his father, and he sees supernatural beings that are not there. For Hamlet to be contemplating death after the death of his own father is not unusual, his thoughts go past what would be considered normal. Some of the first hints of Hamlet’s true mental state come from his fascination with death. He has thoughts of suicide and death throughout the play, these are attributes of a person with a mental disorder, someone who is becoming unhinged. The famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy (3.1 57-91) has Hamlet question
This belief relates to the play because the Ghost of Hamlet’s father decides to visit Denmark and makes everyone question his visitation. Clark states that ghosts appear to “obtain revenge”, although this appears to be true as to the reason Hamlet’s father’s Ghost appears, it is not the actual reason. The Ghost is there to ask Hamlet to “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (Shakespeare 57). In other words, the Ghost is not there to seek revenge physically, but to have Hamlet seek revenge on Claudius for killing him. The Ghost makes his visitation to specifically ask Hamlet to seek revenge on his murderer; however, he does not force Hamlet to seek revenge. Since the ghost does not force Hamlet to seek revenge he appears to the audience that he is a good ghost because he does not hurt anyone and does not appear violet. Therefore, because the Ghost has not been physical this situation allows the audience to become aware that he is a good ghost.
To start with, the ghost heavily influences the development of a few characters in the play which includes Hamlet and his friends. In the opening act, Hamlet’s friends encounter the ghost of the former king while standing guard on the wall of the castle. They are the first and only characters besides Hamlet that the ghost influences. They are also the only ones besides Hamlet that can see the ghost. This furthers the story by sending Hamlet’s friends on a mission to tell him of his father’s return. From the beginning of the play Hamlet is already depressed and down after being called home from school to return to Denmark to witness the funeral of his father. Following the funeral Hamlet meets up with his friends where they tell him of his father’s ghost. Immediately, this sparks Hamlet’s interest and he wishes to hear more of his father. ‘The king my father!/For God’s love, let me hear.” (1.2.192-95 Hamlet) Here Shakespeare shows Hamlet’s interest in the matter
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, written in the 1960s by playwright Tom Stoppard, is a transforation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Stoppard effectively relocates Shakespeare’s play to the 1960s by reassessing and revaluating the themes and characters of Hamlet and considering core values and attitudes of the 1960s- a time significantly different to that of Shakespeare. He relies on the audience’s already established knowledge of Hamlet and transforms a revenge tragedy into an Absurd drama, which shifts the focus from royalty to common man. Within Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Stoppard uses a play within a play to blur the line that defines reality, and in doing so creates confusion both onstage- with his characters, and offstage-
Hamlet is undoubtedly one of the most well-studied and remembered tragedies in all of history. Renowned for its compelling soliloquies and thought-provoking discussions about life, death, and love, the play takes a very serious look at the topics it presents. Based on this famous work is another tragedy, known as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. In this work, which is interwoven with the original, the namesake characters bumble about in the immense world, over which they have no control. Without a sense of identity or purpose, the two merely drift to and fro at the whim of the larger forces around them; namely Hamlet, who eventually leads them to death. The twin plays follow the same story and end with the same result – nine deaths.
There are many productions of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, each targeting a specific audience. In the Elizabethan era social perspectives were used by Shakespeare to influence a target audience. Shakespeare used culture beliefs to makes characters relatable to the audience. Economic values shared between the audience and the characters result in interpretations of a characters situation. Shakespeare uses a wide variety of social, cultural and economic values in Hamlet to connect with a target audience.