Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in today’s world. Many people believe that it is morally wrong to have capital punishment as a sentence to a crime. People also do believe that it is morally permissible for a severe crime. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty. It can be given as a sentence when somebody is convicted of an extremely violent crime. The biggest issue that can be seen with this is that somebody could be innocent and sentenced with the death penalty because of the nature of the crime that they have been accused of even if they didn’t commit it. I believe that there is a moral line between using the death penalty and using other forms of punishment.

Capital Punishment is a form of a sentence that was practiced in Australia and countries around the world. It is no longer used in Australia, however as seen by amnesty, it is still used today in many other countries such as China, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the USA ("Death penalty 2015: Facts and figures", 2017). In ``2015 1634 people worldwide were executed`` ("Death penalty 2015: Facts and figures", 2017). Capital punishment is a process of killing someone as a result of committing a horrific crime. Capital punishment is an act which is not of assistance to the society and therefore, it should be abolished. Capital punishment is morally wrong because it is taking away the life of a human being and disobeying what God would have wanted for civilization. Also, humanity would not look any better by killing people, no matter who they are and essentially not showing dignity to a human being`s life. The purpose of this assignment was to collect evidence and by looking at the evidence, we can support the claim that the death penalty should be abolished in all countries as it adds no benefits to stopping or helping reduce crime or protecting society.

Capital punishment, which is also known as the death penalty, is the punishment of a crime by execution. This extreme retribution is reserved for those who have committed heinous, or capital crimes against society, therefore considered an ongoing threat. Capital punishment was abolished from the Canadian Criminal Code in 1976. It was substituted with a compulsory life sentence without possibility of parole for 25 years for all first-degree murders. However capital punishment is still practiced in over 30 of the 50 states in the USA. Some say that Capital Punishment is an unjust solution to crime, and others say that it isn’t a solution at all, as it is subject to flaws just as any system can be flawed. Dating back, before the Eighteenth Century B.C., Capital Punishment has been an integral part of the judicial system in the majority of countries. Considered to be the ultimate punishment, few criminal offenders will receive this ultimate form of retribution. The State of Texas has the highest record of executions at 300 since the 1970’s. Those executed are murderers and those who have committed serious offenses. The idea is "an eye for an eye", but as Gandhi wisely stated, “An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind”. Shockingly, there have been convicted criminals executed only to be proven innocent later, this is far too late after they have long been

In an effort to make sure that innocent men and women are not wrongly convicted in capital punishments cases, they are given a wide range of appeals procedures. Immediately following sentencing an automatic appeals process called Direct Review begins. It is during this process that appellate courts review the lower trial court’s decision, checking for errors and making sure the case was tried on sound judgment. If any errors are found

People on death row are not really dying. “In 2010, a death row inmate waited an average of 178 months (roughly 15 years) between sentencing and execution. Nearly a quarter of deaths on death row in the U.S. are due to natural causes.” (Wikipedia, 2015). We are paying tax dollars to have people sit in prison for up to 15 years, and to have three quarters of them executed. Should we even have capital punishment?

Andrew was only twenty three years old when he robbed the liquor store on South Lincoln Avenue. He was a high school dropout and didn’t know where his life was headed at that time. If he could go back, he would not have let his friends talk him into doing it. Yes, they needed the money for rent but looking back at the event, it just was not worth it. He’s always had good intentions, but never a drive to discover his potential, which resulted in this. He is now serving his eighth month in prison so far and has put a lot of thought into the lifelong impact this will have on him. “How long will it take him to find a job?, Where will he stay?,Will his mom and sister, take him back after what he did?” He never explained why he did what he did

Cantu was age 17 when he was accused of committing capital murder in 1993. The teen was found guilty and executed. 12 years after his death, Texas investigators found that there was no way possible that Cantu could have committed the murder. The worst part is the police had little evidence to go by and there were only a few eye witnesses that convicted and executed this innocent minor. Debates over capital punishment have been around since its first use in the U.S. in 1608. With the increase of controversies regarding the topic, the need for the right information and facts is prominent. Due to the death penalty’s many detrimental effects on society such as innocent lives taken, ineffectiveness, and the resources being sucked up, we should consider banning it in all 50 states.

Perhaps we should give the judge a knife and tell her that if she has

Capital punishment serves as a deterrence to the would-be murderers. However, many people do not think it is true as many previous studies have been proven false (Rubin). The reason why all those previous study fail is, because they do not take account enough constant factors in a statistical sense. Now this problem will not occur as we have better data and better statistical techniques than were available to others back then (Rubin). Studies has indicated that if we decide not to execute murderers, then we are making a decision that will lead to many additional murders in society (Rubin). “In United States, during a period of increased use of the death penalty, the murder rate had dropped by 26 per cent from 24,562 in 1993 to 18,209 in 1997, the lowest for years (Pakistan: 10 Arguments).” It is estimated that each state execution deters somewhere between 4 and 25 murders per year during the 1978-1997 based on the panel data (Zimmerman). Both data implied that execution indeed help deter additional murders as murder rate decrease in the article, Pakistan: 10 Arguments Each For and Against Capital Punishment.

Capital punishment has been a basic piece of human culture and its lawful framework for a considerable length of time. It is often viewed as a vital sanction to the most heinous of crimes as well as an approach to stop future lawbreakers by fear of death. In many cases, this sort of punishment came to be viewed as an immoral act against humanity, and its legitimacy in a plethora of legal systems has been addressed. As of recently, the civil argument persists. This brought about a wide disparity of laws on this issue. A few countries including China, the US, Iran, Belarus, and others protect capital punishment as a choice, while others like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every European country have canceled the death penalty. Despite the obvious negatives, others chose to keep the practice in their laws. The death penalty is an overzealous “eye for an eye” tactic, that is and has been damaging the fabric of our society. The expense, the immorality and the control over another life to such degree, should be cause enough for any country to not just rethink this heinous and inhumane punishment but to abolish it. The United States inheritance of slavery and racial corruption proceeded with offense, in our utilization of capital punishment, where nearly three times the general population on death row is of black decent.

The problem with capital punishment is that you can take the life of the killer but can’t take away the damage that's been done. Capital punishment needs to be abolished because it is risking the execution of innocent people, it is killing a person which is cruel and unusual, and it is wasting millions of dollars for the death penalty system.

The death penalty has been an issue that has divided the United States for a very long time. Death penalty is the sentence of execution for capital crimes which are punishable by death. While many countries have outlawed it, others (like the United States) practice capital punishment on the state level. The most important question concerning the death penalty is whether it should be abolished or not. The use of death penalty should be abolished from the justice system for three major reasons: it’s cruel and unusual, not a viable form of crime control, and the death penalty is irreversible.

“On the afternoon of July 23, 2007, in the town of Cheshire, Connecticut, two men broke into the home of Dr. William Petit, his wife Jennifer and their two daughters. The men beat Dr. Petit nearly to death with a baseball bat; one of the men raped the doctor’s wife; and the other man sexually assaulted their 11 year-old daughter, Michaela. The two men then strangled Mrs. Petit to death, tied down the two daughters on beds, doused them with gasoline, and, while the girls were still alive, set the house on fire. Dr. Petit survived, but his wife and daughters did not.”

In the eleventh century A.D, to hang a person was illegal unless he/she was found guilty of murder. In 1608, Captain George Kendall became the first recorded execution in the new colonies history. It was not until the eighteenth century that death penalty laws were enacted. However, the death penalty has become a heated debate involving the violation of the constitution and our moral code. People against capital punishment may argue that it’s is a direct violation of the Human's Right Act, the Eighth Amendment and is very expensive to maintain. Others may argue it gives closure to the victims families and creates another form of crime deterrent. Furthermore, the State of Nebraska recently held a vote on whether capital punishment should be eliminated, the result was surprising. 61.2 percent of Nebraskans voted to repeal the 2015 decision to abolish the death penalty.

This position paper will attempt to challenge previous opinions regarding capital punishment. The objective is to persuade the audience to oppose capital punishment by revealing biblical, political, and moral perspectives, as well as supplying effective counters to traditional thinking. This paper seeks to balance each rationale in order to appeal to several mindsets, and beliefs in regard to capital punishment.