Persuasive Essay On Nuclear War

Nuclear weapons are one of, if not the most dangerous weapons in the world today and they are one of the biggest issues the world faces at this current moment. They have the capability of destroying entire cities and then some that could result in millions of deaths within seconds. Radiation from the blasts would kill even more people throughout years to come. They were first used in 1945 at the end of World War II, when the United States dropped Little Boy and Fat Man in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to ‘save’ the lives of American soldiers. Since then, a nuclear arms race was born and it’s becoming more of a concern as time moves forward. Albert Einstein, who was the creator of the nuclear bomb once said “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” Countries should not have access to nuclear weapons because it destroys the environment, there is a possibility of a nuclear war that will end in mass destruction of the world, and countries could save both revenue and resources.

In 1945, two atomic bombs were dropped over Japan on Hiroshima and Nagasaki which resulted in thousands of civilian deaths and a detrimental impact on the environment.

The two atomics bombings dropping on Japan are forever remembered today as a changing moment in history. The US dropped the atomic bomb called “Little Boy” on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945. Only three days later on August 9th, 1945, the second atomic bomb called “Fat Man” was dropped on Nagasaki. This has been the only time that nuclear weapons have been used in war. These bombs have been questioned through history if it was moral or immoral correct. However, the bombs were definitely a moral decision, which helped the country immeasurably. The atomic bombing of Japan was a military success, and a moral decision because it was less harmful than the fire bombings and it helped the country immeasurably.

In 1941, US President Franklin Roosevelt approved the funding for the American-led effort to develop an atomic weapon. This project was codenamed “The Manhattan Project.” The original motivation to create an atomic bomb was out of fear that Nazi Germany was pursuing their own atomic project. When the United States successfully tested their nuclear weapon in July 1945, Germany had already surrendered, and the focus of the Allied powers was on the defeat of Imperial Japan. Ultimately, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japanese cities in early August 1945, leading to the end of the Second World War. The dropping of the bombs led to over 150,000 civilian and military deaths. Despite the massive loss of innocent life, I believe that the United

It is an ordinary Monday morning in New York City and you wake up to begin your day. Emergency alarms suddenly fill the air and you rush outside to see what could possibly be happening. Your neighbors are packing their cars and fleeing in a panic; you then hurry back inside to watch the news. The emergency broadcast system appears on the screen and informs you that nuclear missiles have been launched at the United States one of which is headed to your city. Reality strikes you as you realize that there is nothing you can do except await the impending death and destruction that is headed your way. The following was a possible scenario that could happen to a world with nuclear weapons. The possibility of nuclear war could be eliminated with the disarmament of nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons have an effect on everyone in the world and even on the future generations. They affect everything from the soil to people’s genes. This research will make the reader more aware of a subject of a subject that is rarely talked about. America promotes non-proliferation but has more than 10 000 nuclear warheads in its arsenal. In addition, America is the only country to have ever used nuclear weapons; twice during WWII on Japan. This caused the death of hundreds of thousands with the effect of the bombs still being seen today. America has a huge influence over the weapons and nuclear industry and change must start from

Would you let a country who in the past has used chemical weapons against its neighboring countries to have a nuclear weapon? In 2014, a deal was put in place to let Iran produce nuclear energy. Iran should not be trusted with this sort of ability, because they are a dangerous country that has used chemical weapons against its neighboring countries. Also, Iran is planning on making nuclear weapons and if we are to let them make nuclear weapons the United States will be in danger. The United States should not allow Iran to have nuclear energy due to their past of lying, their desire to make Nuclear weapons, and the dangers

In a world where individual nations are constantly at odds and conflict seems inevitable, it is imperative more now than ever to encourage congeniality amongst states and begin a path towards complete nuclear disarmament. The arguments of Scott Sagan, one of the fathers of the nuclear proliferation debate, can easily find grounds for support inside the Catholic Church. Thus, through careful examination of the flawed concept of nuclear deterrence, the offensive nature of military organizations, and the grave damage weapons of mass destruction can inflict on civilian populations, one can clearly see why the Catholic Church and nuclear pessimists alike are in favor of nonproliferation and disarmament.

Nuclear weapons have many disadvantages to them, but they also have a lot of advantages to them which help out the county who owns them. This reason makes many people believe that the problem of nuclear weapons will be a worldwide problem in the future as well unless it is brought up to discussion in many nations governments.

Through times of conflict and hostility rash decisions are usually made. This has been known throughout the course of history from events ranging from the decision of Napoleon invading Russia to the national prohibition of alcohol in 1920. What has come to be seen of some of these decisions is the imminent fact that most was not needed or didn’t work. Some think one of these hasty and rash decisions as using nuclear weapons to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This action was taken for multiple reasons, including to responding to the adversity of the attack on Pearl Harbor and to ending the war at the earliest possible moment. This deleterious attack, though, annihilated the lives of approximately 66,000 in Hiroshima from the acute effects of the “Little Boy” bomb and about 35,000 more in Nagasaki from the “Fat Man” device on impact and thousands more due to the effects of radiation and wounds (Miller, 2012). Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren’t resilient of the destruction caused back in August of 1945 and still aren’t 67 years later. All that was taken from the attack were the lives of thousands of innocent people and the ruination of a once healthy land. This point in history also marked the first and only time nuclear weaponry has been used in combat. Seeing as though nuclear weaponry hasn’t been active for over six decades now, the idea of nuclear disarmament should be taken into high consideration and implemented throughout the globe and the political aspect and what

The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each,

With World War II escalating, the United States agreed to use the world’s first nuclear bomb to end the chaos. Tensions were rising as the western hemisphere finally unraveled the gruesome techniques Hitler practiced on Jews. As Schweitzer concluded, Hitler and “the Nazis replaced the organismic theory of states with the racial theory of peoples” (Schweitzer 61). To prevent more abuse from happening with Hitler in charge, the United States decided to take action. After Pearl Harbor, the Japanese, who are allies with Germany, were seen as the major threat to the United States. Imprisonment were placed on the Japanese as a way to monitor and prevent Japanese influenced attacks. These actions were brought upon by President Franklin D. Roosevelt shortly after Peal Harbor. As an act to end the war and to get revenge on Pearl Harbor, the United States attacked Japan on August 6th, 1945. Hiroshima was the first target because it had been untouched during the United State’s Air Force bombing raids and was a vulnerable military base for the bomb to be tested. On a quiet Monday morning at 8:15 a.m., the nuclear bomb often recalled as the “little boy” was dropped on western Japan. Young estimated that about “68,000 people died and 72,000 were wounded” making World War II one of the bloodiest war in history (Young 14). Taking over 140,000 lives at Hiroshima, the first nuclear bomb proved to be devastating; three days later Nagasaki gets shattered with a nuclear bomb. On August 9th,

On August 6th, 1945 nearly 80,000 people lost their lives instantly in the bombing of Hiroshima. Three days later more than 70,000 people died instantly with the bombing of Nagasaki (Hall). Those two events remain the only two times in history where nuclear weapons were used in warfare. Less than twenty years later the U.S.S.R tested a nuclear bomb that recorded an explosion 3,333 times as powerful as the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Bennett). The immense amount of destruction that could be caused by these weapons is why the great powers of the world should come together and decided to destroy their nuclear arsenals. Nuclear weapons could easily render the entire race extinct and it is terrifying to think that many countries have the power to cause a nuclear fallout. Nuclear disarmament would not be easy, it would be very expensive, time-consuming and nerve-racking. A nuclear warhead on average costs the government about $55 million. This may seem like a lot but the U.S currently has nearly 7,000 nuclear weapons. If you included production and storing costs of all those nukes the U.S has spent about $5.8 Trillion on its current arsenal (“The Cost of U.S Nuclear Weapons”). That's an insanely large amount of money. You might be wondering if it cost that much just to get and hold on to those nukes it must be incredibly expensive to disarm all those nukes. Not really, it would cost roughly $7 billion a year per decade to begin disarming our current nuclear

There exists a weapon so powerful and destructive that it strikes fear into the hearts of all human beings. It turns the earth to glass and vaporizes people where they stand. This weapon is the nuclear missile, and it needs to be banned before it’s too late. Born out of necessity, nuclear weapons were created at a time when the United States required a means of delivering a quick and decisive final blow to its enemy, Japan, in World War II. The creation of these weapons of mass destruction set forth an arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union that progressively created nukes that were far more devastating than their predecessors. Today, these weapons can travel across the world in minutes, delivering multiple precisely-guided payloads capable of destroying areas the size of Texas. These weapons lie in wait in silos across the Earth ready to cause a cataclysm the likes of which the world has never seen before. Due to the catastrophic levels of destruction caused by nuclear weapons, it is paramount that they are banned worldwide.

Throughout the history of humanity, humans have always fought with each other to survive and possibly thrive from the resources and land obtained from the defeated peoples. Furthermore, these conflicts have grown to be more costlier over the centuries because of technological advances, such as tanks and machine guns. Some of these technological advances have led to a lesser and lesser chance of a conflict breaking out because of the concern of the costs outweighing the benefits of committing to war; also known as deterrence. The most well-known example of this concept is nuclear arms deterrence. With this idea, nine countries around the world employ this form of deterrence because they want to protect themselves, but what happens if it presents more of threat in the foreseeable future? Additionally, this form of deterrence has been known to fail, and many countries see nuclear arms as a bigger threat showing that nuclear weapons is a threat to mankind; therefore, disarmament will be the best strategy to utilize. This concept of nuclear disarmament is known commonly as “Nuclear Zero” and I agree completely with the idea and Professor Sagan’s side of the argument because it prevents the threat of nuclear catastrophe and allows for the global community to work towards a goal of true peace.