Persuasive Essay On Terrorism

The United States contains 5% of the world’s population. However, our nation covers 35-50% of the world’s civilian-owned guns, is ranked first for firearms per capita, and holds the highest homicide rate among all other nations of wealth and democracy at 88.5% (Masters). Such high rates and loose restrictions are bound to lead to tragedy. We will not sit here and make excuses, we will not allow power in the hands of insanity, and we will not allow the safety of our children to be hindered. After each tragedy that has struck, we have failed to successfully improve gun control. As of now, we hold no federal law banning semi-automatic assault weapons, just like the weapons used in the Las Vegas massacre, resulting in

The U.S. continues to implement effective initiatives and provide adequate resources for the War on international terrorism; whereas the threat magnitude of international terrorism is miniscule in comparison to the number of mass shootings and hate crimes which take place in this country on a daily basis.

Gun control is an issue that poses a greater threat the safety of the American public than almost any other issue, including terrorism. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention reports, “from 2001 to 2013, 406,496 people died by firearms on U.S. soil.” By comparison, the State Department reports, “between 2001 and 2013, there were 3,030 people killed in domestic acts of terrorism.” While many in Congress have publicly discussed the threat and importance of fighting terrorist groups such as ISIS, gun violence is a more substantial threat, yet no major gun control policy initiatives have been passed.

Since the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the United States (US) government has focused on terrorism as the biggest threat to stability and national security in the homeland. There have been controversial laws enacted which tested an individual’s Constitutional rights versus the security of the country as a whole, military engagements in foreign countries designed to stop terrorism overseas before reaching the homeland, and a number of law enforcement and government initiatives implemented to identify and investigate terrorists before they commit acts of terrorism or pursue material support activities in support of terrorism. Federal law enforcement agencies have been criticized recently for failing to predict when homegrown violent extremists

It is nearly impossible to go an entire day in the United States without hearing of some act of terrorism. Whether it be a shooting in a public place or threats against a group of people, this violent form of conflict is prevalent in every American’s life. These ruthless acts of cold-blooded murder demonstrate evil in its purest form, and leave death and mourning in their wake. The article “Homegrown Terrorism: Is There an Islamic Wave?” gives an overview of the rise of domestic terrorism since the tragedy of 9/11. Though it was written in 2011, the core message is the same today: terrorism in the United States still continues to grow at a sickening pace, with each new attack seeming more barbaric than the last.

Although the victims related to terrorism on American soil is only 3360 including 911, is considered negligible comparable to the victims of gun violence for instance, which is 406,469 (2001-2013) . However, they refuse to abandon the second amendment related to gun possession. Conversely, despite the “low number” of victims, the amount of fear generated by terrorism is what driving the populace to change. Significant that, the threat for the safety and the security of a nation does not come from the immeasurable loses caused by that threat, rather by the amount of change that threat impose on the values and principles of the nation. Accordingly, the implications of the war on terror drove US to challenge its own values and change its approach to its principles. To point out, I will explain how terrorism has challenged American approach to its

Background/Cause: The September 11 attacks were largely caused by Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda. He held beliefs about the United States leading up to the attacks saying that America was weak. According to his comrade, Abu Walid al-Masri, bin Laden believed that the United States was much weaker than some of the people he was associated with. Bin Laden believed that the United States was a “paper tiger,” a belief not only held because of America’s departure from Lebanon, but also by the withdrawal of American forces from Somalia in 1993 and from Vietnam in the 1970s (Bergen).

Terrorism is one international political issue that has been significant in US society since the end of the Cold War. Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, America’s sense of security has been destroyed and continued terrorist attacks in other parts of the world targeting Americans, as well as other allied nations further fuels a sense of anxiety. From Bin Laden, to Saddam Hussein and ISIS the fear of further terrorism attacks is

Throughout the course of 2016, many mass shootings and fatal incidents have occurred involving the use of guns. Assault weapons, specifically, have been the controversial target regarding these incidents. A large debate broke out as to whether or not assault weapons should be banned from U.S. soil. It is believed that the prohibition on these weapons would assure the country’s safety and would dramatically reduce homicide rates. While the claim does provide logical reasons as to why a ban on assault weapons would be beneficial, it does not consider any critical consequences upon taking this action. Therefore, The pursuit of banning assault weapons on U.S. soil will not ensure national security because it will affect law abiding citizens, establish a blatant sign of government tyranny, and ironically raise violent crime rates.

“The United States has a huge number of guns, perhaps as many guns as there are adults, an estimated 300 million”(Carter). The argument on the governmental control over the large amount of firearms is heavily debated in today’s society. I think that this argument is important in our society right now. Gun control is frequently brought to the surface in the news when there are acts of terrorism in America. One side of the argument would say that

Last year while sketching through TV and trying to watch news with my father, we saw one of the most devastating and horrifying attacks in Boston Massachusetts. Recently, terrorist has made many attacks and lives of innocent people have despaired. United States has to recruit more immigrants into their armies to help preserve the safety their people, homeland security, communicate with suspects kids to comprehends sides, send more satellites to the space, revise and reviews some of the traveling among suspicious travellers and stop providing weapons to certain location that could harm the entire community in America. If we fallow all of these purposes, I believe that the horror, and the terrorism could be reduced and certain incident can be prevented.

A Nation filled with terror has a need to hail their hopes deeper into empty promises. Upon frequent occasions gun control has been the likely candidate for the appropriate topic and to actually confront the situation within itself. Waldman states in “The Case For Banning Guns” that “America would simply be safer if we constructed our gun laws like one of our peer countries in Europe or Asia, in which private gun ownership is relatively rare and strictly regulated.” Meaning some can own firearms once all requirements have been met and all regulations have been firmly set into place. The United States government and its possible regulations should have begun their stranglehold on Americans at the first sign of a possible situation in the past.

In the USA, Americans have right to own guns, and this is for self- protection. However, many people are trying to take over advantage of the law by using guns to apply physical attack on someone. This makes the issues of regulating the access, ownership, and use of guns are paramount importance. The question of whether guns should be controlled touches the core of the country’s national security. Many Americans think that gun control is wrong because guns do not kill people, people do. If a person wants to kill someone, there are millions ways for him to do his dreadful action without guns. Also, guns do provide protections. On the other hand, many others agree that gun control should be enforced. With the widespread all of the incidences of unpurposed mass shootings on the media, several proponents have had to question the existing legal on gun control in the USA. Civilians should be kept away from guns to

Within the history of the United States, there have been many enemies, foreign and domestic; among these combatants are terrorists led by radical Islam. These terrorists first major offensive against the United States began on September 11, 2001, a date many will remember for the rest of their lives. This attack has been a harbinger to the United States beginning a war on terror. This war on terror began as retribution for those lost in terror attacks, leading into aiding the population of war-torn countries, as well as displaying the force of the United States across the world.

Purpose: To inform readers of the effects the recent terrorist attacks have on society today.