Death Penalty: Good or Bad?
Jasmine Garcia and Raymond Osuch
Barry University
Audience Analysis: Primary 1. What kind of problems run through my audiences mind? 2. What is the age range of my audience? 3. What religions do they practice? 4. Where is each audience member from? 5. How many more girls are there than guys are in my audience? Secondary
1. Why is this topic important to them? The topic is important to my audience because it may help them see the death penalty in a different light.
2. How will my audience benefit from my words? The audience will benefit from my words because they will discover the pros and
…show more content…
Armed burglary 17. Burglary of a dwelling or burglary of an occupied structure
Transition: Now that we understand the features of the death pennalty, we would like to talk to you about the benefits of the death penalty. B. Benefits 1. Research: The death penalty has the most extensive due process protections in our nation’s criminal justice system; innocents sentenced to death if truly innocent will be exonerated and not executed. An alternate to the death penalty is a life sentence, although life sentences are prone to pardon, commutation, escape, clerical error, change in law, and other possibilities which could release someone with a life sentence back into society. (Sharpe, 2009) When someone’s life is intentionally taken, the balance of justice is disturbed; retribution with the death penalty shows the intolerability of murder. Capital punishment brings closure to the families, as well as others who cared about the victims. The death penalty is also not morally wrong like some anti-death penalty campaigns argue; the crimes of rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder, and larson are the morally wrong choices (Fein, 2008). Capital punishment brings justice upon criminals, who commit infractions on these laws. As Dr. Budziszewski, a professor of government and philosophy of the University of Texas at Austin states, "Society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him. Crime
The death penalty is one of the greatest controversial punishments in the world. There are numerous people who agree with this practice and plenty more who do not agree and believe we should be done with it all together. Some important credential people who give compelling arguments for abolishing the death penalty is Diann Rust-Tierney and Barry Scheck, whereas; the people against abolishing it is Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger.
Across America a battle of morals rages over the death penalty. Like many other controversial issues that consume our society, the issue of the death penalty is not easily defined. Some people feel that one should reap what they sow. However, the issue is more complex than the eye for an eye standard. With the death penalty in place, our country is stumbling down a twisted path with numerous complications nationwide.
The Article provides numerous reasons the United States and Great Britain should have the death penalty. O’Sullivan addresses all the main counter arguments when explain to his audience his conclusion. His supporting evidence includes death penalty decisions in history and several other statistics. Emotionally terms, faulty cause and effects scenarios, and either/or point of views are other ways the author conveys his opinion to the audience.
In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know about the death penalty such as its pros and cons. While the innocent can be killed, the death penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have escaped from prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims’ families get justice and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the death penalty was very inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don’t make a right. Most people think that the defendant deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants’ family think?
Why is the death penalty used as a means of punishment for crime? Is this just a way to solve the nations growing problem of overcrowded prisons, or is justice really being served? Why do some view the taking of a life morally correct? These questions are discussed and debated upon in every state and national legislature throughout the country. Advantages and disadvantages for the death penalty exist, and many members of the United States, and individual State governments, have differing opinions. Yet it seems that the stronger arguments, and evidence such as cost effectiveness, should lead the common citizen to the opposition of Capital Punishment.
The death penalty is a subject of much debate amongst the American people. Some people support capital punishment while others do not. Examination of sources and analyses of important history regarding the death penalty will hopefully add to the understanding of why it is so important in our day and age to have such a penalty to deter and deal with the most violent of offenders in our modern day society. A major influence on my position is my uncle being murdered when I was younger. The points I use to support my argument for being Pro Death Penalty are the history of the death penalty, the death penalty as a
The death penalty in America has been declining: despite the diminished use, flaws are more apparent than ever. Some of these are racial bias and the execution of innocent people. With a topic like capital punishment the information available can be overwhelming, with as much information that is out there. The words capital punishment and death penalty often have strong emotional opinions, due to being a controversial topic that so many people have different views on.
This passage presents a discussion about arguments concerning morality of the death penalty. This is an important debate to both proponents and opponents of the death penalty because of the serious implications of the punishment. The two positions argue whether or not the death penalty should be prohibited. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence indicates that death sentence is both cruel and immoral. In contrast, opposing evidence suggests that is a moral punishment for certain offenders. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that the death penalty should not be prohibited is the stronger position, the position supported by the preponderance of the evidence cited in the passage. The most convincing and forceful reasons in support of the position that capital punishment should still be used are that it is the only moral punishment for brutal and heinous crimes, that it is more humane than a life long prison sentence, and that it was found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, these reasons and opposing viewpoint will be discussed next.
The death penalty, or capital punishment, has always been a topic of much debate in the United States. There are those who support it and those who oppose it, and each side has their fair share of points being made, backed by supportive evidence. The topics range from the morality of this punishment, including the methods of execution as well as fairness issues in regards to sex and race. The first issue that will be addressed is in regards to the death penalty working to prevent violent crimes.
Does the Death penalty still serve the fundamental purpose that was originally proposed, and if no, is there another way? Overall the argument on the use of death penalty can go either way. The real issue is defining the gray areas in constitutionality of the death penalty process and actually seeing if it serves as an effective benefit for society. This research essay will dig into what the death penalty actually means, the history context, the use of the precedents, views on both sides, and come to decide what we can do to make the death penalty more
There is a topic that lingers in today's society “The death penalty” which has been around since the 1800’s hundreds. The death penalty still remains as a controversial issue in society. In the last sixty years, there has been numerous and many polls that has been carried out to determine the amount of support that the death penalty has. There has been many abolitionists that have made it known to others that the death penalty should be abolished in the US for decades. America has always been threatened with terrorist attacks, such event that has occurred in September 11, also the distribution of virus that was known to be deadly, and also random attacks by dangerous people from across the country. Due to these attacks there has been an outrage, a moral outrage, also there are new debates on whether to use or to abolish the death penalty as a way to stop criminals from committing crimes. There has been thousands of innocent people that have lost their lives due to terror attacks. There has been a rise on rape and murder due to these criminal behaviors. The victim’s family members are left with anger and hurt and
I am sure that everyone of you have heard about aliens and UFOs. Indeed, we all have heard about the famous case of aliens and UFOs in Roswell, New Mexico. Most people might be interested in the topic of aliens, but I know that the majority of you just think of it as rumours and the existence of them are impossible. Therefore, I am standing here in front all of you to make you change your perspective. I am strongly confident that I have found the evidence of their real existence to convince all of you.
The legality and use of the death penalty in the United States is a subject that has caused one of the greatest debates of our time. There are a variety of polarizing viewpoints and opinions on this issue. Some Americans find that there are cases where it is necessary for our justice system to utilize the death penalty and feel that it is a fair punishment. Others feel that it would be better to spare the criminal’s life and would rather subject them to a life in prison instead. Surprisingly, the United States is the only Western country to currently use the death penalty. Many Americans are not educated on the pros and cons of keeping or abolishing the death penalty. As this is a very controversial topic, one cannot explain every single differing
The system of law over the years has changed dramatically with new technology and changing of methods and laws. One thing on the other hand has not changed and that’s the death penalty. Over the years the death penalty is now in discussion for one of the most controversial decision’s the court system can make. With all the questionable debut about what’s right and wrong the people of the United States know there are two groups of opinions. If the death penalty is still a reasonable option in today’s society, or if it is inhumane. The death penalty has many views from different people’s perspectives but everyone has their pros and cons and how it should be handled.
How do you feel about the government taking money so that they can fund the death penalty? Why is it that poor people who cannot afford quality legal aid, are much more likely to get the death penalty? If the death penalty is such an effective deterrent, why does it have to be imposed varies times? Many other questions rise when talking about the death penalty. The death penalty is inauspicious. There are a multitude of reasons for the death penalty being unjust. A few being, innocent people have been wrongfully convicted and executed. Did you know that at least 1 in 25 people sentenced to the death penalty in the U.S are innocent? Also, it is immoral, and always has huge chances of unchangeable mistakes. Some even bigger factors as to why the death penalty is inadequate is that most people can’t afford an expert attorney. A further point is that the cost to hold executions are more expensive than keeping a person alive. Lastly the most immense reasoning is death penalty is not proven to actually lower crime rates. In this essay I will talk about what is most important when thinking about the death penalty.