Petrozuata CaseSolutionv3

in our calculations, as this company exhibited dramatic value differences to others in the sample, (likely to skew our results and prove misleading). Using the average of the revised sample field for each ratio, we inserted Torrington’s values where appropriate to generate an entity value. The findings generated two values for Torrington, 606 million and 398 million. Taking the average of these two numbers, Torrington exhibited a relative value of 502.41 million. Because of the lack of related information given in the case, and the often large differences in measures amongst competitors, different capital structures, internal management strategies, there remained many unknowns in our model. We decided it would be best to use this valuation to reaffirm our assumptions in our DCF valuation. (Please see exhibits)

The question that transcends the project is whether equity investors be sufficiently rewarded to justify there financing interests. The answer to this question is dependent

Government interest rates from Table B, 8.72%. The 10 year rate was chosen to be consistent with time lengths. Then the value for equity, debt and the firm need to be calculated, this is a simple step. The market price of the shares is multiplied by the number of outstanding shares to find the value of equity and the book value of long term debt is used for the value of debt and the value of both equity and debt are added together to come up with the value of the firm. The weight of the equity and debt can now be calculated by dividing the value of equity or debt by the value of the company. Lastly, the tax rate was calculated by using the balance sheet, given in exhibit 1, to determine income taxes paid and dividing it by earnings before interest and taxes for each of the last ten years then by taking the average of the ten years tax rates.

Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (Eds.). (2011). Essentials of corporate finance (7th ed., Rev.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Project finance is a kind of Financing that has a priority does not depend on the creditworthiness of the sponsors proposing the business idea to launch the project. Approval does not even depend on the value of assets sponsors are willing to make available as collateral. Instead, it is basically a function of the project’s ability to repay the debt contracted and remunerate capital invested at a rate consistent with the degree of

The Risk Free Rate of a 30-year Treasury Bond is given as 8.95%. Also given is the Market Risk Premium of 7.43% and a firm wide equity beta of 1.43. The tax rate is assumed to be 44.1%, the same as 1987’s 175.9M tax paid from 398.9M EIBT.

1a. Please use the capital asset pricing model to estimate the cost of equity. At the date of the case, the 74 over T-bonds. Which beta, risk-free rate, and risk premium did you use? Why? Financing Components Debt Equity Market Values Weight Cost of Capital (After Tax) $ 6,823,736,197 0.85 3.72% $ 1,176,263,803 0.15 28.18% Total: $ 8,000,000,000 1.00 WACC WACC Inputs: Beta: Risk-Free Rate: Market Risk Premium: Pre-tax Cost of Debt: Income Tax Rate:

We added the market risk premium of 6% to the 4.60% because 6% is the rate that investors want above the risk free rate due to the risk of the investment. This equals 10.6% which is then multiplied by the beta of the company of 1.1. Beta is a measure of the stock’s volatility in relation to the market. A beta of 1.1 means that Worldwide Paper Company has slightly higher volatility than the market does. The total cost of equity then calculates to equal 11.2%. This tells us that given the risk taken in investing in the company, a shareholder should expect an 11.2% return.

In light of the organization 's affect ability to obligation settled component, I consider it a far-fetched resource of assets to fund the 2005 profit they guaranteed. Despite the fact that a 2005 profit guaranteed, but it doesn 't imply that a stock buyback is not feasible or off the table. However, every alternative requires a new source of assets.

If Fe’nix del Sur, LLC accepts the contract they might make a potential profit of $4 million in

Assumptions need to be made for the Cost of Equity. We used the corporate rate of 11.766%

Using the same market risk premium and risk free rate (5.5% & 4.62% respectively) given in the case, the averaged beta of 1.40, the pretax cost of debt of 7.65%, and the weighted average of debt & equity, the products & systems

* Price of Pulp (US$/Ton): The projection is that the price will increase 8% per year.

The suppliers of crude material, parts and administrations to the firm will be the source control over the organizations. This is on account of the suppliers may decline to chip in with the organizations by charging to a great degree high charge for a few assets. Along these lines this in influence the organization's expense of creation because of the extravagant crude material. Why the supplier will deal the cost with the Mercedes-Ben Company? This is on the grounds that the suppliers have the altered clients in the business furthermore they are solid premise in the

The risk premium should be calculated by using holding-period returns, as 9.90%-3.48%= 6.42%. Then we can compute the cost of equity is 3.48%+0.97*(6.42%) =9.71%. According to Exhibit1, 1987, we calculate the tax rate by dividing income tax over EBIT. $175.9/$398.9=44%. Then we can calculate the firm’s WACC = (1-44%)*(9.34%)*60%+9.71%*40%=7.02%.