preview

Plessy V. Korematsu Research Paper

Decent Essays

Throughout history people’s views on certain subjects have often changed, and with these changes have come disagreements. In some cases, when one disagrees on a subject, such as a law, there will be a dissent of some kind, most likely going against the law. Even so, people will still voice their opinions if it goes against one law or another in most cases. People will stand up for their beliefs when there are consequences because keeping their basic civil rights intact is more important to them than abiding by the law.
People have stood up for their beliefs all throughout history, and have faced many consequences for doing so. One example of a man standing up for his beliefs is in 1892 a man by the name of Homer Plessy was taken to court for challenging the Separate Car Act in Louisiana (Konkoly, “Plessy v. Ferguson”). The …show more content…

In 1942, during the early stages of the second World War, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt set in place Executive Order 9066 in response to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The executive order allowed American citizens of Japanese descent to be banned from certain areas deemed critical for American national security and granted Japanese internment camps to be used during the war (Konkoly, “Korematsu v. United States”). Fred Korematsu was a Japanese American living in California at the time when the order went into action who was well aware that he would soon be removed from his home as it was in a critical part of the nation but was set on staying in his home. When the order did come for Korematsu to remove himself from his home, he refused and was convicted for disobeying the law. Fred Korematsu knew that if he resisted the law his chances of being arrested and brought to court were very high, but he believed that Executive Order 9066 violated his Fourteenth Amendment and he was willing to risk arrest to protest the violation of his civil

Get Access