Plessy Vs Ferguson Case Analysis

In order to show how the “separate but equal” doctrine came to be, as a class we created a mock trial of the Plessy v. Ferguson case. The idea of separate but equal allowed states to segregate black and white people through public services and accommodations for over 60 years. Despite this idea of equality in the doctrine, many people took advantage of it, as it gave both black and white people an influence on whether they were inferior or superior.

Laws are enforced to provide our society with safety, boundaries, protection of rights, and overall justice. The United States Constitution and Bill of Rights were established years ago to reduce the tensions and conflicts of our newly founded nation. It sought out to accomplish this by providing justice through an equal voice for all citizens. However, this equal voice for justice more often times than not is squandered and diminished. Things such as race, religion, and culture often times blur the lines of the law and fair outcomes in a court. Individuals feel that their beliefs are more important than the protection of rights and the deliverance of law or the law itself cannot go outside of its limitations to provide justice. This is apparent in the court cases of Marbury v Madison, Plessy v Ferguson, and the book To Kill a Mocking Bird by Harper Lee. These cases clearly exemplify that the law does not always provide justice, although it endeavors to do so.

Segregation had been something the United States had struggled with for years. During the 1890’s segregation started to become more common and white people felt superior to other races, especially African Americans. White people believed, black people did not deserve the rights and respect that they had. Homer Plessy, the so called wrongdoer in the Plessy vs Ferguson case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighths black, and he had an appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a railroad ticket from New Orleans to Covington La, and sat in an empty seat in a whites only car. Homer told the conductor he was black, and when asked to leave and move on to the appropriate car, he refused. He was an American citizen who had bought a first-class ticket and deserved to sit on that train. When the conductor called the police, Homer Plessy was arrested and later in court his case challenged the system and had a large impact on the African American community.The Plessy vs Ferguson trial affected humanity in both a positive and a negative way, because of the small negative short term cultural effects, such as disrespect towards African Americans, and the long term positive effects that lead to the equality between black and white people.

The landmark case of Plessy v. Ferguson is a Constitutional case in which it had to be decided who the constitution meant when it said "all men are created equal." This case is very important to our constitution and to the people being governed by the constitution because it brought up issues that hadn't been discussed in the U.S before. This case shows the degree of federalism and how much the government paid attention to it. The amendments in the constitution do not apply to a simple race or ethnicity. Throughout history laws have been made and destroyed at the cost of colored people, in the Plessy v. Ferguson case it is shown that due to the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments all citizens have equal protection under the law. Plessy was denied his right, as well as other colored people because they belonged to different bathrooms, they belonged to different train cars and they belonged to different water fountains at this time in history, but Plessy'

Plessy vs. Ferguson impacted America in both unfortunate and strong ways. It all started in 1892 were a man named Homer Plessy refused to sit in a Jim Crow car that was for blacks only. According to the laws of Louisiana Homer broke one of their segregation laws. Even though Homer was 7/8 whites and 1/8 black he was still arrested and taken to jail. Plessy made a compliant that later on let to a case. Judge Ferguson ruled against his argument that making Plessy sit on a separate seat violated his constitutional rights. Afterwards Homers lawyer insisted to the Supreme Court that the Louisiana’s separate car act violated the 13 and 14th amendment, which were abolishing slavery and grand citizenship rights to U.S citizens, unfortunately the Supreme

In 1892 the Supreme Court ruled 7-1 against Homer Plessy, a one-eighth black man who fought to sit in a train car reserved for white people in Louisiana 1. Since he was not allowed to ride in said cars, his 14th amendment right against discrimination of any American citizen was violated 1. The Supreme Court rejected Plessy's argument that Louisiana law conflicted with the thirteenth amendment and the fourteenth amendment 1. The justices claimed however, that separation of races does not make someone feel

On July 19, 1890, Louisiana passed an act that provided equal but separate accommodations for black and white American citizen. Homer Plessy, challenged the statute in 1896 declaring, since he was seven-eighths Caucasian and one-eighth African blood, he was entailed to all of the same rights and privileges of the

In 1890, the Separate Car Act was enacted in the state of Louisiana requiring whites and non-white Americans to travel in separate railway cars. As a result, a passenger, Homer Adolph Plessy took a seat in a “whites only” car in one of the Louisiana trains and refused to move to the “blacks only” car and was subsequently arrested despite being only a eighth black.

Plessy v Ferguson: Plessy v Ferguson was a Supreme Court case ruled that segregated ‘equal but separate’ a public compromise for both colored and whites don’t violate the fourteenth amendment that made segregation legal.

The 13th amendment only applied to slaves which was not the case for Plessy. The 14th amendment was not intended to give African Americans social equality instead only political and civil. Brown wrote the majority opinion while Harlan was the only dissenting vote. Harlan believed that the inequality and segregation had gone too far, becoming natural and socially acceptable. Although Harlan was conservative from Kentucky, a border state during the Civil War, he realized the harm segregation was causing. Harlan stated, "Our Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." Although conservatives thought they were acting according to the law, they were only twisting it in order to stay at the center of power. On May 18, 1896 the 7-1 decision was reached. The law under the 14th amendment of separate but equal was constitutional. Since there were car accommodations for both races, it was equal. Although Plessy lost the case, the separate but equal law was overturned in Brown Vs. Board of Education in

Once june 7, 1892, he bought a top of the line ticket to an excursion between new orleans Furthermore Covington, la. , Furthermore took ownership of a empty seat On An white-only auto. Properly captured What's more imprisoned, Plessy might have been brought with trial Previously, another orleans court What's more indicted from claiming disregarding the 1890 law. He that point documented An appeal to against those judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, toward those louisiana preeminent Court, contending that the isolation theory disregarded the equivalent insurance statement of the fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states starting with denying "to whatever representative inside their ward the rise to security of the laws," and additionally those thirteenth Amendment, which banned subjugation. The court ruled that, same time the item of the fourteenth correction might have been with make "absolute correspondence of the two races in front of the law," such fairness stretched out main as such Similarly as political Furthermore social equality (e. G. , voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e. G. , sitting Previously, a line auto person chooses). Similarly as Equity henry Brown's assumption place it, "assuming that one race be second rate of the other socially, the constitution of the united states can't set them upon the same plane. " Furthermore, the court held that those thirteenth revision connected main of the inconvenience of subjugation itself. Those court explicitly dismisses Plessy's contentions that those theory stigmatized blacks "with An symbol about inferiority," pointing out that both blacks Furthermore whites were provided for rise to offices under those theory Furthermore were just as rebuffed to disregarding those theory. "We Think as of the underlying misrepresentation

Associate Justice John Marshall Harlan, the lone vote against the ruling, gave the dissenting opinion of the court. Harlan “insisted that the court had ignored the obvious purpose of the Separate Car Act, which was, under the guise of giving equal accommodation for whites and blacks, to compel the latter to keep to themselves while traveling in railroad passenger coaches. Because it presupposed—and was universally understood to presuppose—the inferiority of African Americans, the act imposed a badge of servitude upon them in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment.” (Duignan). He also stated, “The sure guaranty of the peace and security of each race is the clear, distinct, unconditional recognition by our governments, national and state, of every right that inheres in civil freedom, and of the equality before the law of all citizens of the United States, without regard to race. State enactments regulating the enjoyment of civil rights upon the basis of race, and cunningly devised to defeat legitimate results of the war, under the pretense of recognizing equality of rights, can have no other result than to render permanent peace impossible, and to keep alive a conflict of races, the continuance of which must do harm to all concerned” (Quotes from Plessy v. Fergusun). Harlan further explained what the constitution says by stating “Our Constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In

According to the Court, the Fourteenth Amendment was only concerned with legal, not social, equality.” Justice John Marshall Harlan was the only man who was in favor for Plessy. Harlan thought it was unconstitutional and believed segregation had the effect of creating classes. As used the same article, according to Harlan, “These laws promoted and perpetuated the belief that African Americans were inferior to whites.”

I agree to read about is Supreme Court from Plessy v. Ferguson of the United States a long time ago in a between is African-Americas without people is whites and colored of his skin in the national. The government to activists is the different being to be an opinion in a story from the history of Civil Rights effect on the American conscience. Becuase has systems of segregation was a few year later in the world for New North or South is against made by the Supreme Court with the 13th and 14th Amendments. The colored race in South African become the laws in support of their racism most parts of the American South was made challenged.

After the end of Reconstruction in 1877 Southern state legislatures enacted Jim Crow laws to legally segregate the races. In 1890, the Louisiana legislature passed a law requiring railroads to separate passengers on the basis of race. Trains that had two or more passenger cars were required to have designated seating for different races. If there was only one passenger car in a train, these cars were to be divided by a curtain or some other form of partition. A fine of $25 or up to 20 days in jail was the penalty for sitting in the wrong compartment.