preview

Pluto's Planetary Analysis

Decent Essays

The debate concerning Pluto’s planetary status had been going on for decades before the International Astronomical Union’s almost unanimous verdict in 2006 to designate it a dwarf planet. Many distinct people had many dissimilar suggestions, but the argument was mostly torn between those wishing for Pluto to retain planetary status and those proposing another classification. Neil DeGrasse Tyson wrote The Pluto Files: The Rise and Fall of America’s Favorite Planet to examine why Pluto ought not to be considered a planetary body and instead a dwarf planet or Kuiper Belt Object (KBO). Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an exceptionally qualified individual to address the issues brought up over the course of the book. He received his bachelor’s degree …show more content…

While contemplating exhibit designs for the Rose Center, Tyson decides to write an essay titled Pluto’s Honor, in which he imparts his opinion on the status of Pluto, “As professor Tyson, however, I must vote – with a heavy heart – for demotion... But I’d think Pluto is happy now. It went from being the runt of the planets to the undisputed King of the Kuiper belt” (Pg. 65). He deems that changing Pluto’s classification is imperative to understanding the genuine nature of the universe because keeping it a planet hinders that. But that it doesn’t necessarily devalue Pluto’s merit in the Solar System or in figuring out what the true nature of the cosmos really is, and he wants people to be able to sympathize with this sentiment. Tyson had received mail and email wherein “Schoolchildren and adults alike branded [him] a thoughtless, heartless Pluto hater” after the New York Times article that pointed out the Rose Center’s exclusion of Pluto from an exhibition of the planets (Pg. 95). These correspondences denounce him on a personal level, as if he was the only person who had any input on the issue, as if he omitted Pluto just to be malevolent and spiteful. Tyson surely did not deserve this treatment as he had never done the same to the Pluto supporters, he simply stated the facts and his interpretations of them, not once did he form ad hominin …show more content…

Some factors that lead Dr. Tyson to peg Pluto as a dwarf planet are that “the Pluto-Charon system orbits a point in space outside of the physical extent of Pluto itself” and that “Pluto and Charon are in a rare double tidal lock, always showing the same face to each other” (Pg.34, 36). There are binary stellar systems, asteroids, planets, and even binary KBOs, all of which orbit a site in between them; however, planets should not be affected so extensively by one of their moons gravity to form such an arrangement. Likewise, planets don’t become tidally locked to their moon(s), even Earth and its moon, which is struggling to coerce Earth into a tidal lock together with it, has failed to achieve this double tidal lock. Alternatively, the numerous characteristics of Pluto comprise “a long list of properties that are not shared with any other planet in the system” according to Tyson (Pg.33-37, 118). The majority of Pluto’s attributes and features are instead analogous to celestial small bodies of the Kuiper Belt, including comets, asteroids, and other dwarf planets with their eccentric and debris filled orbits and compositions. Tyson points out that “By 1853, it was clear a new class of objects had been identified: the asteroids” and that “Practically overnight, the planet count dropped back down to seven” after the discoveries of objects in

Get Access