preview

Power In Athens

Decent Essays

Understanding the Role of Power in Athenian Justice and Morality In the era of the Peloponnesian War, Athens commits numerous heinous acts to its subordinate city-states: from the siege of Melos to the slaughter at Corcyra, Athens in many cases refuses to show any sign of mercy. The Athenians’ willingness to conduct these actions largely stems from a mindset which treats morality, justice, and power as one and the same. While this mindset is, to an extent, innate to human nature and the mentality of warfare in general, it is taken further than what would be considered normal in the case of the Athenians. Particularly, Athens justifies its actions with a mentality which stems largely from their capitalistic regard to power and hypocritical …show more content…

In this manner, Athens’ unsympathetic mindset for the plight of smaller entities can be found to derive from Athens’ own social structure. In Athenian society, a just act is ideally differentiated as such by the society itself. On a global scale, this can be interpreted to mean that a city-state is held accountable for its actions by others, and the morality of a state’s atrocities are inherent to if it has the power to accomplish them. Pericles states this on the individual level during the Funeral Oration, where he claims that “power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people,” and that “what counts is (...) ability which [one] possesses” (Thuc 2.37). In this oration, Pericles is drawing the conclusion that, because an aspect seems to be present in the successful Athenian society, the same virtue holds on a state-wide scale. This claim offers some additional insight to the Athenian mentality as a whole; if the society allows morality to fall to the domain of one’s peers, it stands to reason that they would maintain this idea when it comes to the dealings of city-states within the geopolitical climate of Greece. Pericles further demonstrates the capitalist view of power in his final Speech to the Assembly, where he says that, given the choice of a man in the face of danger, he “[prefers] the man who stands up to danger rather than the …show more content…

Pericles states that, now that military failure has befallen Athens, they have “repented of [their] action when things went badly.” (Thuc 2.61). Athens followed Pericles in his decisions when they seemed to bode well for them, but once their hubris and actions have led them to defeat, they place the blame on Pericles. However, Pericles argues that “[he is] the same as [he] was, and [does] not alter;” rather, it is Athens that has changed and left the responsibility on him. This illuminates a theme of democracy, where the whole distributes guilt for their actions such that ownership for their mistakes is not as readily felt, but when they lead to failure, the blame falls on a scapegoat, even when they remain consistent in their viewpoint and when the blame actually lies in the leadership as a whole. This lack of ownership for particular actions lends to the idea that Athens refuses to recognize their deeds as unjust and indicative of any larger issue. The distribution of responsibility in a democracy is but one of the ways in which Thucydides illustrates the possible flaws in Athens’

Get Access