preview

Prescribing Error Rates Between Ophthalmic And Non Ophthalmic Prescriptions For Patients Admitted Into An Acute Hospital Setting

Better Essays

Comparison of prescribing error rates between ophthalmic and non-ophthalmic prescriptions for patients admitted into an acute hospital setting: a retrospective analysis.

Ayesha Amreen Karimi1 (Corresponding author), Ameena Khurshid2

1: North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carlisle, CA2 7HY ayesha.karimi@ncuh.nhs.uk
2: King’s College London, Newcomen Street, London, SE1 1UL ameena.khurshid@kcl.ac.uk

Abstract
Aim: To compare the prescribing quality of ophthalmic and non-ophthalmic prescriptions for patients admitted into hospital wards.
Methods: All patients admitted to an acute hospital in the North West of England with ocular diagnoses requiring regular long term eye drops were identified. The first patient cohort comprised those patients admitted between August 1st and December 31st 2014; following staff education on ocular medication, the study was repeated for those patients admitted between August 1st and September 30th 2015. Inpatient drug charts were analysed retrospectively to assess the quality of prescribing. Comparison of ophthalmic and non-ophthalmic prescriptions was done using the χ 2 test.
Results: 252 and 116 patients were admitted for the first and second cohort respectively. In the first cohort, 120 (40.8%) of ophthalmic prescriptions vs. 1267 (83.6%) of non-ophthalmic prescriptions were correct; 48 (16.3%) vs 89 (5.9%) of eye drops vs non-ophthalmic medications were prescribed incorrectly; and 126 (42.9%) of ophthalmic prescriptions vs 160

Get Access