Pro Death Penalty Essay

The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from committing crimes, it will eliminate

Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.

     There are many reasons to both support and oppose the death penalty. Many people can feel very strongly about whether or not they approve of this method of punishment. I feel that the death penalty is wrong, and I believe that there is much support to back this up. I believe that the death penalty is wrong because it is not an effective deterrent, racially and economically bias, unreliable, expensive, and morally wrong of society.

In the United States, the use of the death penalty continues to be a controversial issue. Every election year, politicians, wishing to appeal to the moral sentiments of voters, routinely compete with each other as to who will be toughest in extending the death penalty to those persons who have been convicted of first-degree murder. Both proponents and opponents of capital punishment present compelling arguments to support their claims. Often their arguments are made on different interpretations of what is moral in a just society. In this essay, I intend to present major arguments of those who support the death penalty and those who are opposed to state sanctioned executions application . However, I do intend to fairly and accurately

The lack of proper resources during a trial can make the difference between the innocence and guilt of a person. The death penalty does not always show the innocence or guilt of a person. It shows how much he or she is willing to spend to help the trial go his or her way. The death penalty is an unfair system to those who cannot afford the “evidence” they need to help free them.

Thousands of people will attack the death penalty. They will give emotional speeches about the one innocent man or woman who might accidentally get an execution sentence. However, all of these people are forgetting one crucial element. They are forgetting the thousands of victims who die every year by the hands of heartless murderers. There are more murderers out there than people who are wrongly convicted, and that is what we must remember.

In Richard Dieter’s article "Innocence and the Death Penalty: The Increasing Danger of Executing the Innocent”, he shares the mistakes and the dangers of the death penalty. Capital punishment had gotten more and more controversial during the 90’s because of the risk of innocence. There was no DNA evidence during this time to prove if a person was innocent or guilty, so when putting them to death there was still a possibility that they were incorrect on the verdict. Today there are DNA tests that help prove whether someone is innocent or guilty, but it cannot bring those back who have been executed unjustly because of the death penalty. Lack of witnesses, the pressure from the public to solve the case, and limited resources for the defendant were common obstacles and quickened them to be charged as a suspect and then sentenced them to death based on the crime they “committed”. As technology advanced with DNA evidence, some criminals who were on death row were let out of

When Robert Gleason Jr. was put to death in Virginia on January 16 (he chose the electric chair) he became the 140th so-called “volunteer” for execution since the reinstatement of capital punishment in 1976. In fact, over 10% of US executions have been “voluntary,” usually meaning that the prisoner has given up his appeals.

"Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also” (“Bible”). Subsequently, many individuals believe that the death penalty is cruel and inhumane ; however it has many positive effects on society such as , it is economical,allows for population control,and it deters crime.In the since on how it is economical,where it cost almost 100k a year for a normal inmate in prison,this almost double for someone with life without parole, these expenses include - food,dress,water,maximum security cell block,and much more.Not only, but these expenses are yearly, where according to recent statistics it only cost 7000/10000 dollars to execute someone.

Imagine walking down a dark empty hall, you see a light praised at the end. You taste a bitter sensation conglomerated with the salty metallic taste of blood as you cringe in agony. You feel nothing, numbness in your the body as you nervously walk closer to the light. Your nasal passage is clogged, but you can smell the fear of the isolated atmosphere. Immediately you stop in your tracks. You now reached the end and confront the thing that will take you out of this world: the electric chair. But this is not the worst of this imaginary scene. All your life, everything that you have worked for up until now, will all disappear. Your family, your friends, all the relationships you have forged with everyone you know, will all come to an end. You

The death penalty is one of the topics people either fully agree with or are absolutely against it, very few people are in between. I'm personally pro death penalty. There is pros and cons to this topic, as well as everything else.

“There are murder victims' family members who go through this process thinking they'll feel peace once the revenge of the death penalty is carried out. What I've learned from meeting with these people is that you don't feel better in revenge. You feel better in forgiveness” (Steinberg, 2015). Today, there are 31 states that are for the death penalty, leaving 19 that are against it. There are many reasons to be for and against the death penalty, but in my opinion, I think that there is a better way to take care of criminals rather than killing them.

“At yearend 2013, thirty-five states and the Federal Bureau of Prisons held 2,979 inmates under sentence of death,” (Snell,2014) . Approximately ten percent of those people have severe mental illnesses. It also costs millions of dollars for every case associated with capital punishment which is significantly more than cases not associated with the death penalty. There has also been little to no research done that actually proves that it deters crime at all. Capital Punishment is negative in several aspects, it kills many mentally ill men and women, it’s very expensive, and it’s inefficient.

One of the many things that holds so much power and authority in whether or not a person lives or dies is the death penalty. The death penalty can be closely related to a coin flip. A coin flip is too final, and that is exactly what the death penalty is for our justice system. It is a decision that they can not always take back because the accused is already dead. The death penalty is administered to people who are convicted of a capital crime; it is an execution of an high offender.The death penalty is an issue that has the United States divided three sides; those who are either completely for, against, or those who do not want to pick a side. There are quite a few people who are fans of the death penalty, while there is also a raging group of people who oppose it. The existence of the death penalty in our justice system is out of a desire for revenge because it is seen as an act of “an eye for an eye” and there has been many scenarios of wrongful sentencing.

The death penalty seems to be a very debatable subject. There are arguments and support for both sides of the debate, but which side is right? That is a tough question to ask. After reading the article in the textbook, two other articles, and looking at statistics, I seem to feel that the death penalty may not be the right answer.