Gyeongrok (Steve) Byun
Professor Hayley Laird
English 118 - 0551
July 20, 2015
Prejudice in Society: A Social Challenge
Prejudice is the term referring to “the practice of forming an opinion or value of someone or something, in the absence of direct experience of that person or thing” (Augoustinos, Walker and Donaghue 225). Prejudice include preformed opinions and views made prior to uncovering of the real facts and knowledge behind the subject from an individual, a group of people, or even the values and beliefs they espouse. In some societies, prejudices have been regarded as pervasive social challenges, serving to separate groups of people and individuals along divisive lies drawn by their different opinions (Rauch 1995). While prejudices
…show more content…
Allowing racial prejudice to continue without any form of intervention would be opening doors to building up animosity and negative tension between involved groups (Augoustinos and Reynolds 244). Using the same example of racial prejudice, it would be apparent that the raised dissimilarities and opinions against either groups will be destructive in terms of building social cognition and cohesion among racial groups (Augoustinos, Walker and Donaghue 226). On the other hand, Rauch advocates for intellectual pluralism with the standpoint that it would provide protection for the vulnerable minority groups. As pointed out in his article on prejudice, “pluralism conjectures that there will always exist such prejudices”, which should instead be marginalized, exploited, ridiculed, but left alone at the end (Rauch 1995). It is evident that preconceptions and bigotries cannot be “eliminated from every corner” as presupposed by purist view. Contrary to Rauch’s view that suppressing prejudice will be counterproductive, however, measures put across public utilities and institutions are beneficial in curtailing spread of malicious opinions. These include equal employment opportunity extended to all people by public institutions regardless of their racial background. Another effective measure has been the inhibiting of any form of racial utterances, abuse and actions in these institutions, especially violent behavior, motivated by racial hatred with the malicious intent of injuring a person of another race. In addition to these, institutions have the mandate to sue in court such behavior within our justice
Jonathan Rauch’s essay, “In Defense of Prejudice”, explores the idea of pluralism. Rauch focuses on intellectual pluralism in which he states, “permits the expression of various forms of bigotry and always will”. Pluralism may bring different topics such as racism, sexism, and homophobia. Rauch Points out if misguided ideas and ugly expressions be corrected or criticized it would help public safety.
Prejudice is the “injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights,” according to Merriam Webster. In simpler terms, prejudice is being judged regarding one’s religion, race, personality, physical appearance, etc. Unfortunately, everyone has given or received some form of prejudice. Prejudice also exists in the government, when cases and trials are solved. This can be shown through Reginald Rose’s novel, Twelve Angry Men.
In his essay “ In Defense of Prejudice”, Jonathan Rauch explores a much talked about topic in the United States today, prejudice. As his title implies, he is in defense of prejudice, he makes it clear that he is not a supporter of hate or racism, rather a supporter of “intellectual pluralism” “which permits the expression of various forms of bigotry and always will.” (pg 1). Rauch defends the right to express all forms of bigotry. By utilizing specific examples where prejudice is at center stage, Rauch tries to convince his readers that the solution to prevent prejudice is not attempting to eradicate it, rather he believes if we, as a society channel prejudice more effectively we can make it “socially productive.” Ranch defends his
It has been thoroughly thought over what current topic or issue that people experience in most environments today, at both a micro and macro level that would be able to be examined and have come to the decision of looking at the most widely discussed subject, prejudice. All people are affected by prejudice in one way or another and it can impact on people's lives depending on what form it has taken. Also to be able to acknowledge that all people can be prejudices and see this is the first step to overcoming it.. The question that has been decided upon is that of “What types of prejudice do we see commonly today and how do they affect an individual at a micro and macro level?”
Jonathan Rauch’s essay, “In Defense of Prejudice”, explores the idea of pluralism. Rauch focuses on intellectual pluralism in which he states, “permits the expression of various forms of bigotry and always will”. Pluralism may bring different topics such as racism, sexism, and homophobia. Rauch argues rather than eliminating hate and prejudice society should educate people against prejudice. He believes by eliminating prejudice really means having everyone to have the same prejudice. To be prejudiced means to have a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience but based on a biased belief.
Prejudice is an opinion in which is not based on any reasoning, and may cause harm. Prejudice can be seen just about anywhere, and it affects our daily lives. There are many different ways a person can show prejudice beliefs, but why do they believe things they have never experience? Some may say it’s something personal with one’s self that causes prejudice thoughts, or some may think it their surroundings contribute as a motive.
Prejudice; the unjustified negative attitude towards an individual or group based solely on their position within certain societal groups. Prejudice is not merely a statement of opinion or belief, but an attitude that includes feelings of contempt, fear and loathing, which results from a preconceived cognition or stereotype. I.E. black people aren’t as smart as white people, all gay men are effeminate etc. These core beliefs more often than not lead to heavily discriminatory behaviour from the in-group in order to undermine the out-group/minority and force them to believe their own stereotypes. This idea can be clearly related back to the movie Remember the Titans where racism, sexism and homophobia were a regular occurrence backed up by
Prejudice is “an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge” (Merriam); according to Lystra Moore Richardson of Yale University: “prejudice… was part of the very fiber of Southern life [during the Great Depression].” With these two pieces of information, it is derived that people formed judgments and opinions of a person without just
Most common form of prejudice, in the United States at least, is in between racial groups. Unfortunately, racial prejudice is so prevalent in the Western society. I believe most people think of themselves as unprejudiced these days, even myself. Sometimes we didn’t realize that we have expressed indirect forms of prejudice, ones that are subtler. Example in the American society could be when white people
Prejudice is something which has affected everyone at one time or another. It is like looking out a frosted window and not seeing a clear picture. When people look through a frosted window they sometimes see a blurred vision of the world outside. Sometimes we see people as very different from ourselves when really they are just a very little bit different from us. We can even see someone as an enemy instead of for who they really are. These narrow minded views in our society are prevalent, even though most of the time they are
As Maya Angelou once said, “Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future and renders the present inaccessible.” Prejudice is an issue our society face today that has been continued from the past. Prejudice is a negative attitude or an unfavorable opinion that one has against another formed without reason nor knowledge. There are many types of prejudice including racism, sexism, classism, nationalism and many more. However, they all induce discrimination and stereotyping.
A very useful technique is the one used by Frank R. Westie (1953), that measures race attitudes and racial prejudice by comparing responses related to perceptions of occupational groups towards African American and white people, being one of the first ones that applied this method.
Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future and renders the present inaccessible. (Maya Angelou) By definition prejudice is a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience. Prejudice to others is hate, judgement, and evil. The effects of prejudice are shown in the novel The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, the play The Merchant of Venice, and the tragedy known as the Holocaust. Prejudice affected all people differently, but one thing is true for all; prejudice is crippling and disables those who experience it from being who they truly are and doing as they please.
In the article “In Defense of Prejudice”, Jonathan Rauch argues that society should not seek to eradicate racism, which is impossible to do, and other forms of prejudice, but rather find how to make the best of it. There is a gray area between a prejudiced belief and a controversial one, and it is impossible to know which belief is prejudice and which is truth. Rauch argues that intellectual pluralism permits the expression of various forms of bigotry and avoids any attempt to eradicate prejudice, because this would force everyone to share the same prejudice. However, the new “anti-pluralism”, which Rauch names “purism”, enforces the belief that society cannot function properly until prejudice is eradicated. At universities, in school curriculums, criminal law, and workplaces, the use of certain words are permitted as an attempt to eliminate prejudice.
Functionalist theory argues for race and ethnic relations to be functional and thus supply to the melodic conduct and strength of society, racial and ethnic minorities must assimilate into that society. Assimilation is a process by which a minority becomes socially, economically, and culturally absorbed within the dominant society. The assimilation perspective assumes that to become fully fledged members of society, alternative groups must adopt as much of the dominant society 's culture as possible, particularly its language, mannerisms, and goals for success, and thus give up much of its own culture. Assimilations stands in contrast to racial cultural pluralism the maintenance and