Rationale
Modern Times is a commentary on human survival in the economic, political, industrial and social lifestyle of the 20th century society and remains as relevant, for the 21st century too. The problems The Tramp highlights through the use of comedy are unemployment, poverty, drugs, strikes, riots, inhumanity in the workplace are still clearly evident in the current society. The main aspect that this movie analysis focuses on is the effect of Charlie Chaplin’s environment on his character of The Little Tramp. Throughout the movie, the Tramp can be seen performing all his jobs very mechanically and meaninglessly. He remains naïve about his surroundings which can be compared to situation of people in the 21st century wherein tasks are performed without thinking. Machines seem to replacing men rather than assisting the men. The plot is very important in accentuating and unfolding the character of a modern life style.
Analysis
The film’s opening title - “The story of industry, of individual enterprise - humanity crusading in the pursuit of happiness” - is followed by a symbolic image of a flood of men and women flowing out of the subway station similar to the rows of sheep. From this we can easily understand how like sheep, these herds of men and women do as they are told and flow into the city’s
…show more content…
The Tramp is made to keep working as the machine feeds him. After the break, the assembly line again gets faster than The Tramp can manage due to which he loses his ability to remain calm. Mentally stressed, The Tramp jumps onto the conveyor belt, continuing to tighten the bolts on the product that is being assembled. The Tramp’s entire body is immediately sucked into the machinery, moving over the gears that turn the assembly line. Unaffected, he continues to tighten the bolts of the machine, his wrists repeating the motion that he performs all
But what?ll happen to us? How?ll we eat? You?ll have to get off the land. The plows?ll go through the dooryard. (p.33)? This display of cruelty exemplified by the tenant owners shows the inhumane and pitiless attitudes which they possess. Their cruelty towards their fellow man epitomizes the inhumanity which exists throughout the novel. Along with acting inhumane, businessmen also act selfishly and greedily in the beginning of the novel. Knowing that there will be many people homeless and jobless, orchard owners send out flyers encouraging tenants to come to California and pick fruits on their land. The flyers call for a certain amount of workers, yet they are sent to many more people than they call for, causing inflation at the orchard, the orchard owners receive many workers, and because of the mass number of employees, they can pay the workers less than what was originally promised. The orchard owner?s wily ways shows the lack of care for their fellow man. They exemplify their greed and dishonesty, and do not care that others are starving while they are perfectly content. They exemplify the inhumane and selfish actions which are ever-present throughout the novel.
From the movie Modern Times, which is the masterpiece of Charlie Chaplin, a Famous English comic actor, we can find lots of not only funs but also philosophy in it. Yes, Chaplin is a greatest comedy master, and he makes his movies humorous vividly with his funny personality and actions, especially in the movie Modern Times. However, if you think Chaplin’s movie only talks about humor in order to make us laugh, you will be wrong! In Chaplin’s movie Modern Times, the humor in this movie that we can see is external; as a matter of fact, this movie is internal contains philosophy that Chaplin shows us Marxist ideas in his specific time background, which needs us observe carefully.
As Marx’s states in his theory, when the working class becomes aware of their exploitation, this will result in a revolt lead by the proletariats. The major theories studied by Marx can be used to analyze the characters and situations presented in the film.
The working class in this film are forced to endure agonising labour in extremely dangerous environments whilst the upper class, the ‘sons’ are free to live at their will. The dystopic setting of the ‘depths’ becomes evident through Lang’s use of symbolism when the dictator’s son, Freder, journeys to the depths and starts to see the workers being eaten up by the machines in the scene ‘Slaves of the Means of Production” (14.58-17.52). This symbolises the dystopic society in which workers do not have the right to be safe. This idea forms a contextual connection to the 1920’s Weimar Republic where there were two distinct classes, the conservative elite, who were free to live at their will, and the workers who were forced to endure labour with no guarantee for safety. Through the contextual connections of political reform and the shared perspectives of dystopian societies the quote “the object of power is power” is strongly supported by George Orwell’s ‘1984’ and Fritz Lang’s ‘Metropolis’.
Ryan Cooger’s Dolly-out shot moving away from Oscar (subject) and following Emi (store owner) represents a change in power economically because of his prolonged unemployment. Although, conversely his white t-shirt, black sweater and blue pants help fuels the fire. In addition to, the shot-reverse-shot of Emi (Oscar’s Employer) creates a sense of depression and poverty. These themes describe perspectives the
In “The Company Man” by Ellen Goodman, The author attacks a typical hardworking middle classmen. This piece portrays diction, imagery and tone in order to exemplify the intended theme the author wants to convey. With these attributes, the theme that those who tend to be blinded by the illusion of wealth and tend to forget those who are important in their lives are destined to die lonely and disregarded by those closest to them.
Sharon Olds “On the subway car” used imagery, and organization in order to convey the realization that although the two characters are very different they share one key similarity, they are both hunter and hunted.
Robber Barons were the stage masters in the shift from transcendentalism into progressivism. Scene. The film starts with a generous grant from Andrew Carnegie then transforms into humble means with the common transcendentalist tenets. God by showing the Church, Men with the graves and linage, and nature with it’s rolling green hills. Enter antagonist; the black behemoth sits upon its iron throne as it transcendents the brick chimneys and rains down soot on its subjects. This is not the transcendent vision, although there's an escape. Queue; into the countryside, living space in nature, were the church is the town hall, and it's a place to raise a family, “air and sun are what we need for growing whether it's flowers or babies”(The City). The
However, even though the subject matter of the Marxist struggle has changed through time, the very quintessential nature of capitalistic mode of production remained unchanged, for it is profit-driven and turns all cultural spheres into mass marketed commodities. Within the domain of cultural industry, the notions of authenticity and resistance become utopian, illusionary and fake; social
By 1938 Chaplin was one of the greatest writers, directors and actors in the film industry, well known for his socioeconomic and political satire within The United States. He felt so confident in his ability in mocking the world’s most dangerous man that he was willing to spend $1.5 million of the $2 million budget. The two differences in this later film from his earlier work were the introduction of sound in films and the disappearance of his reoccurring protagonist “The Little Tramp”. Chaplin’s use of sound in this film was a huge factor in history, not
Since the beginning of the Industrial Age, Americans have idealized the journey towards economic success. One thing people do not realize, however, is that that journey is not the same for every individual. For Charles Foster Kane (Orson Welles), the main character of Citizen Kane, directed by Orson Welles, the path towards riches and a fulfilled life is being well liked. He serves to please others. He strives for that attention. This view cost him his happiness in the end. In this man’s rise and fall through prosperity, Welles shows the futility of striving solely for likeability.
As the narrator of “London” walks the streets, he hears a variety of different sounds. The state of London is so terrible that he can hear their “manacles” (line 8) in every “cry of every Man” (5) and in “every voice” (7). Child labor is tragic, but the “chimney-sweeper’s cry” (9) “appalls” (10) the Church, rather pitying it. The government also does nothing to ease the “Soldier’s sigh” (11). The institutions in control
It is important to realize how society works because it helps us to better understand how the film views the economic system that produces people like Travis. It also helps us to better understand what it is like to be like Travis who falls under the Proletariate category. For instance, the use of social structures and the idea of the lower class revolting. Taking this into account is important because it helps us to better understand how the film views the economic system that produces people like Travis. This paper argues that the film illustrates Marx's ideas in order to critique the capitalist
In Fritz Lang’s Metropolis and Charlie Chaplin’s Modern Times both use scenes that depict things such as poverty, revolts, and homelessness to show the viewer what workers dealt with in our society in that time period. While watching the film of Modern Times that starred Charlie Chaplin, the film showed that the worker (Chaplin) was not only being treated unfairly but also worked to his limit. This subject was also touched on in the film Metropolis as well when the main character visits the underground of the city that he has been so used to living in with his lavish lifestyle. Metropolis touches on this subject a bit more than Modern Times as not only were the workers not well nourished but also didn’t seem to have a home and family to go back to.
This is an agreed conception of film and human life, that man is a being with the possibilities of success or failure. We also see that Schatz’s way of thinking is how film and the settings of the culture are with in the film and what drives the film to its climax for the viewer, but at the end it does due what Schatz’s talks about with gangster films.