In the fourth century, from 306-337, the first religious tax exemption was formed by Constantine, the Emperor of Rome, which granted the Christian church complete tax exemption from all forms of taxation, in an act of his conversion to Christianity. Now almost seventeen hundred years later churches remain tax exempt and cause a burden on the U.S. economy. Because of this burden, religious facilities should no longer remain tax exempt because churches help contribute to the U.S. debt, sell products overpriced, and let pastors live wealthy life’s off of the churches revenue.
The United States as of November 2014 is $16,787,451,118,147 dollars in debt. Churches tax exemption causes the United States a burden because, as of a study conducted by Jeff Schweitzer, PhD, a former white house senior policy analyst, churches own about 500 billion dollars’ worth of untaxed property. According to another survey estimates that “stringent enforcement of religious tax exempt facilities could generate up to $16.75 billion in additional annual revenue - almost enough to fund NASA for a year.”( Bekiempis, Victoria, Newsweek Global) this is already a large sum of money but , “ Less conservative estimates, including an academic paper that pondered the fiscal implications of taxing all churches like for-profit corporations, put that number at $71 billion - enough to send a Mars Rover into space almost every two weeks.”( Bekiempis, Victoria, Newsweek Global) With that kind of money being taxed
Freedom of religion is one of the most cherished foundations of both American society and the Church. The eleventh Article of Faith provides an excellent definition for freedom of religion, “We claim the privilege of worshipping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege: let them worship how, where, or what they may.” As society grows less religious, there are concerns that freedom of religion is in danger. In his 1990 Ensign article “Religion in Public Life,” Dallin H. Oaks states that “we must reaffirm and even contend for religious liberty.” The best ways we can defend our freedom of religion are to ensure that our government is secular and to exercise self-government in the
In New England, Baptists who did not pay taxes to support the the Congregational Church had their goods seized and sold at a "public outcry" for a fraction of their worth, or cast
History shows a pattern of change in relation to religious involvement of governmental affairs. As religion becomes less a part of American life, the court develops new laws to accommodate our new society. Look to the communities we live in presently and ask yourself if the American people are facing oppression of religious freedom, a freedom listed in our Constitution under the First Amendment. This spirals into an abyss of politics. Is same-sex marriage a personal matter or a public one? Is the Republican Party fair in opting to end abortion? Should a woman have contraceptive included in her health insurance plan despite the religious views of her employer? This is one of the areas in which
Even when the Constitution establishes a separation between church and state, traces of religion can still be found in public and government environments, such as the Pledge of Allegiance containing the words ‘under God’, American currency having ‘In God we trust’ and other such events and places. Consequently, this prevalence of Christian ideology violates all Americans’ first amendment right to freedom of and from religion and has a negative impact all citizens as it conflicts with their individual beliefs, religious or not.
The economy is the strength of a nation it is the provision to finance an obstacle, however, that money also travels to churches to benefit the people and the building. Tax money is given to the churches to expand, yet money is utilized for personal gain. The "Massachusetts Constitution" implies “such moneys shall never be appropriated to any religious sect,” (Massachusetts, Article 29) churches have requested for money and deceived the people and implicated false information, nonetheless, a church is where God’s home associates and people will be giving money.
The ability for religious people to exercise their religion in opinion and practice has been a sacred right held up since the beginning of the United States. What happens when one’s religious practices conflicts with public values? This question was integral to the Supreme Court and its rulings in the cases of Bob Jones University v. United States and Church of the Lukumi Babalu v. City of Hialeah. In Bob Jones, the university’s tax exempt status was revoked because the university’s religious beliefs were contrary to the public values of racial equality. In Lukumi Babalu, the religious beliefs of the Santeria Church in Florida about animal sacrifices were in conflict with the public values of the community. Bob Jones University lost their religious
The goal of the Religious Liberty Accommodations Act is to provide everyone in Mississippi the same freedoms that are in our Constitution without the fear of being prosecuted for their religious beliefs. Therefore, I find that the Act is legal and I believe the goal of the Act are just and democratic because it does not mention discriminating against anyone. However, the LGBT community feels they will be targeted for discrimination under this law. This Act and many others like it has the country torn between doing what is socially acceptable and what is religiously acceptable, but professionally it is consistent with the values of the professional social work.
In the United States, religious neutrality appears throughout society as an attempt to respect majority and minority religions, which seems implausible due to the complicated relationship between religion and government. When the government makes legal decisions involving religion, the ideal of neutrality seemingly dissipates when one faith appears to garner more respect over another in earning the majority decision in the Courts. This impossibility of state neutrality is apparent when balancing citizens’ freedom to practice their religion with the government choosing one religious value over another. This idea of balance originates in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which declares, “Congress shall make no law
In my findings on Mississippi’s Religious Liberty Accommodations, the Act refers to the U.S. Constitution and various principles of anti-discrimination laws. The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution established the right to freely exercise religious beliefs, and according to the Act, “the right to freedom of religion undergirds the very origin and existence of the United States” (Hodge, 2006). In addition, the Act highlights principles of international law, such as those outlined in the United Nations (UN) Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which identify religious freedom as a universal human right.
license), called capitalism or unbridled laissez faire. We find that in the late 20th century and early 21st century, the economic corruption of American Christianity has become endemic, especially in the mega-churches. It has been reported that Franklin Graham earns $800,000/yr and Rick Warren $900,000/yr. Widespread, all too many super large churches of both liberal and conservative persuasions, Old World or New World convictions, are misusing their stewardship, cooking their books, exploiting the congregation, and for some, outright corruption. By way of their tax-free
In the United States, religious freedom is a unique right that not all countries allow. The founding fathers instilled this idea although they predominately followed the Christian faith. Several documents and common American morals have Christian roots; some of which include the establishment of God given rights and basic human decency. The words “In God We Trust” on our currency and “One Nation Under God” in our pledge represent the guiding principles that the United States was established on. Although some may believe these words are controversially bias toward Christianity, they are an important part of history. There are multiple references to faith throughout history and several words and concepts are derived from Christian
The first part of this verse is really important, it says; “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities.”
Nick Gillespie. "The U.S. Should Implement a Sin Tax to Increase Budget Revenue." Opposing Viewpoints: The Federal Budget. Ed. Amanda Hiber. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Bucks County Community College-OVRC.
America’s first income tax was executed as a way to help finance the overwhelming costs of the Civil War. Even though the income tax in 1862 was commonly a personal income tax, it added a tax on corporations, including withholding and taxing certain corporate interest and dividends but pursued to avoid double taxation. “An 1885 pamphlet wrote ‘‘[double corporate taxation] violate[s] the principles at the foundation of all systems of taxation’’ (Bloomfield 2011 p. 179). This attempt to raise money was not successful and public debt continued to rise. In response, the 1864 tax act reduced income ceilings and specifically included partnerships and corporations as taxable individuals. Afterwards, the Revenue Act of 1913 formally distinguished personal
America’s constitution allows individuals dwelling on the nation’s soil to have freedom of religion. However, Christianity which is the dominant religion in America is reinforced through government institutions. American currency mentions god and majority of public schools holiday vacations are set to coincide with Christian holidays. Religions that are not Christian based are often viewed as wrong in society and publicly tarnished. Social workers need to advocate religious equality by educating individuals so that they respect other religious beliefs, as well as spirituality. Religions that are not dominate deserve the same respect as any other religious believe. Diversity includes religious and spiritual beliefs. No believer of any religion