Restorative Justice : The Juvenile Justice Perspective Essay

For centuries, our justice system had one common goal and that was retribution. Our justice system was a retributive system, it severely punishes those who committed wrong and/or unjustly acts and crimes. However, approaching the 20th century, we as a society has come to realize that our retributive system, we’re creating more problems and hardships for, not only, the person who committed the act but also society itself. In this awakening, we have come together to create a new conceptual system style

The use of punitive measures as a method of criminal justice practices has barely rehabilitated juvenile offenders in the Chicago. This punitive methods impacts the juvenile offenders leading to radicalization and crime delinquency in the state. On the other hand, restorative justice is a system that incorporates all the parties in a specific offence with the aim of collectively dealing with the aftermath of such an offense and the determination of the future implications of the situation (Johnstone

Name: Tutor: Course: Date: Restorative and Criminal Justice in the State of Chicago There has been a strong oppositional difference and contrast between restorative justice and criminal justice in Chicago dating around four decades ago (Braithwaite, John Bradford). Consequently, this contrast seems to have become a permanent fixture providing two alternative systems under the same justice umbrella. Up until recently, criminal justice has been canonized in the judicial system, but with recent developments

Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System Nathan Tabita Columbia College Abstract Throughout this paper, various articles will be discussed in further detail on the issue of restorative justice within the criminal justice system in the United States. Both benefits and disadvantages of restorative justice will be analyzed, in order to have a greater understanding of the alternative justice program, and to remove any preconceived ideas unsubstantiated by facts. Focus

The Balanced and Restorative Justice (BARJ) approach introduced first in 1993 through a grant to Florida Atlantic University (FAU) began as a national initiative of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). It seeks to serve juvenile offenders with a perspective to achieve restoration or a guaranteed favorable return to reverse their once delinquent behavior. It serves juvenile offenders providing them with a rehabilitation role instead of retribution role. BARJ addresses

Psychological research shows that eyewitness testimony is not always accurate; therefore it should not be used in the criminal justice system. Discuss. Word Count: 2,589 There has been considerable interest and study in the accuracy or inaccuracy of the use of eyewitness testimonies in the current criminal justice system. Results collated by several studies add to the bulk of literature suggesting that the current usage of eyewitness testimony by the legal system is far from ideal

order to maintain a fair and just society. Therefore, it is the juvenile justice system’s responsibility to establish institutions and legislation to protect the important role that young people play in society. The system should also be driven by welfare and justice concerns as young people have special needs in regards to their age, and their physical, emotional and social development. It is essential that these welfare and justice concerns are addressed effectively by the system in order for young

of youth incarceration and how restorative justice methods can be substituted for incarceration to yield better and more effective results. Restorative justice holds the belief that “criminal punishments are more effective when they cause the offender to make amends with their victims as well as their communities. By using a phenomenological approach the study seeks to discover the essence of experiences of multiple individuals who have experienced restorative justice approaches. Data will be collected

H.R.1501 - Violent and Repeat Juvenile Offender Accountability and Rehabilitation Act of 1999. H.R. 1809 focuses more on non-violent offenders, H.R. 1501 focuses towards violent and repeat offenders. Legislation Option 1: H.R. 1501 was introduced to the House on 04/21/1999 and passed through both the House and the Senate, the main focus of this Bill was “to provide quality prevention programs and accountability programs relating to juvenile delinquency” (H.R. 1501). This bill helps to solve some

of restorative justice and its aims towards youth offending, whilst arguing points for and against the current system and whether or not it is more appropriate in terms of dealing with youth offending. It will also define restorative justice as well as defining what is meant by conventional justice. Making clear how and why these two systems came to be a part of youth justice whilst concluding as to which if either is more appropriate in dealing with youth offending behaviour. “Restorative justice