Rhetorical Appeal Of Logos, Ethos, And Pathos

Fake! Fake! Fake! No one ever wants to be known as someone that has a body part that is fake. For example, when someone famous is reported getting their breast enlarged, it is all over the news.

People of many walks seem to have a certain effect on a group of people, may that be through Ethos, Logos, or Pathos. As I watched Lidia Yuknavitch tell her story, I was captivated beyond measure; it was as if she was speaking directly to me without even trying. The way the words flowed from her mouth and into my ears was unlike anything I had ever experienced, but what gave her that right? For me? It was the way she reminded me of an influential woman in my life. My Grandmother has never been one to put me down or tell me that I’m a mess up. She is constantly encouraging and always tells me how proud she is of me. Even if I’m a misfit. As Yuknavitch explained it, it’s exactly how it seems; a person who missed fitting in. As soon was she said those words I knew that I fell into that category. I am a misfit and as Yuknavitch spoke, she told me more about who I was. Ethos, is an appeal to your ethics to convince the audience of the character of the persuader. And the more I watch these Ted Talks the more I see this form used. Yuknavitch explained it as being one of us, she’s been a misfit and continues on her daily life as one ( Yuknavitch 3:30 ). She begins her story will sadness and a feeling of no escape, she showed the crowd a side of herself that you wouldn't have been able to guess otherwise.

Aristotle believed that rhetoric frequently utilizes three persuasive appeals, Logos, pathos and ethos. The newspapers, magazines and newsreels of the day, certainly support the use of these types of rhetoric.

Thomas Paine manages to include all three rhetorical appeals in one paragraph. He appeals to logos (logic) by claiming he is simply stating the facts and by asking readers to not only look at the present, but the future. Paine appeals to pathos (emotion) by acknowledging the audience's preexisting beliefs and values, and by asking them to set aside their biased opinions and to let their reason and emotions decide. By acknowledging the readers' values and referring to the "true character of a man", he establishes a common ground with his audience; this appeals to ethos (ethics), which helps the author gain his/her audience's trust based on their credibility and character.

Although people are well intentioned in their use of pesticides, people are ignorant of the harmful effects of them. Carson uses appeal of to pathos and logos to convey his point. Carson describes in the passage that while people are trying to kill weeds and insects, as a consequence of that we are in return hurting our ecosystem. She states, “ to still the song of the bird and the leaping of fish in the stream, to coat the leaves with a deadly film, and to linger on in soil all this intended target may be only a few weeds or insects”. This quote in the passage is used to appeal to the reader’s sense of emotion by making the reader feel a sense of responsibility. Although people easily kill bugs and weeds, they would never think that it would

In a post-September 11th America, it is not uncommon for the mentioning of the word “terrorist” to spark any number of emotions in its citizens. In response to activities such as the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, as well as the 2001 anthrax scares, Congress proposed the USA PATRIOT Act. Supporters of the Act cite the importance and immeasurable need for greater protection in terms of national security, which is the government’s responsibility first and foremost to protect its citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. However, for every proponent there is an equally passionate opponent who partially believe not only does the Act impede on civil liberties and individual rights but was an opportunistic ploy to grant excess

Marlon Brando was a large Hollywood star during the 1950’s, but during 1965 Brando was seen as challenging and uncooperative while shooting Morituri, which negatively impacted his stardom. The 1966 documentary, “Meet Marlon Brando,” is comprised of multiple interviews taking place in a New York hotel, with Brando about his new movie coming out, Morituri. In this short film, the Maysles Brothers want to shift the public’s view from Marlon Brando being a man who is challenging and uncooperative, to someone who is intelligent, charming, and light-hearted. In this film, the Maysles Brothers use the rhetorical appeals of pathos, logos, and ethos, as well as including fallacies such as exclusion, appealing to the crowd, and red herring.

As a veteran who served this country countless times in the Kosovo War and the War in Iraq, I believe that I will be the communities best option for police sheriff.

While I had previously heard of Ethos, Pathos and Logos, I didn’t have a clear understanding of the effect each could have to an audience. Each rhetorical appeal can be useful when persuading an audience, but the most effective use of each would be pathos. Think about a time when you believe something to be true, you just felt it and when presented with actual evidenced that your beliefs were incorrect it didn’t sway your way of thinking. How many times have you seen a headline about a crime of logic? We as humans are emotional creatures. I believe it to be impossible for us to make a decision without emotion.

Ethos is the appeal to authority, and an example is the use of an authoritative figure as a promotion. Pathos is the appeal to emotion, which acts upon relating to and drawing out the emotions of the audience (Kirszer and Mandell 13). To understand the purpose of the lecture requires an analysis of the rhetorical strategies and logos, paths, ethos being used as a means of persuasion to appeal to the

In class, we have discussed rhetoric, discourse communities, and the importance of properly conveying a point. While my professor, Mr. Larry D. Huff, does not seem to believe in the “rhetorical triangle,” we have had successful discussions on the ways we can prove a point using ethos, pathos, and logos. I successfully joined a discourse community and learned its respective ethos, pathos and logos. My sophomore year of high school, I auditioned and was accepted to the theatre department of The High School for Performing and Visual Arts and joined a discourse community which changed my life. The bumper sticker stretches across the entire back window of my car. Regardless, I am proud to have it for what it represents. This essay will explain the importance behind my sticker.

“Rockstar” is a song by a hip-hop artist named Post Malone that was released in 2017. The song is about how he is feeling like a rock star because of his fame. The song backs up this claim by comparing famous rock star moments in history to what hip-hop artists are doing currently. The song is a digital artifact because it follows the 5 principles of new media according to Lev Manovich (Manovich). The song Rockstar uses ethos, pathos, and logos as tools to make his single reach number one on the Billboards 100 website while pushing the message that hip-hop artists are the new rock stars of this generation (Johnson-Sheehan, Paine).

In this essay, I will closely examine the role of ethos, pathos, and logos as they were utilized in the 1992 Presidential Debate video clip. Throughout Clinton and Bush’s debates, they used the three options of persuasion effectively and discretely; however, it is evident that out of the three ways of persuasion, the candidates used ‘pathos’ because of the content they were providing. It was apparent that Bill Clinton was more prepared to display forms of persuasion than George H.W. Bush was because Clinton had prior experience dealing with lower income people. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will explain and analyze how each candidate made use of the three forms of persuasion: logos, pathos, and ethos.

Dority, Barbara. "The USA PATRIOT Act Has Decimated Many Civil Liberties." Homeland Security. Ed. Andrea C. Nakaya. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Your Every Move." The Humanist 64 (2004). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 3 Sept. 2015.

Writing this rhetorical analysis was a new experience to me. It proved to be very strenuous and took a lot of time to organize and think about exactly how to support everything. This rhetorical analysis has taught me how to use ethos, logos, and pathos while critically reading any text. This paper has helped me to understand that I even need ethos, logos, and pathos in my own work and how to incorporate it in my papers. This paper has been a great learning experience and something that I can use for future reference.