preview

Rue Morgue Vs The Bone Collector

Decent Essays

A question that is often debated is that of what makes a good story. In the 1800s, Edgar Allan Poe created one list of rules that he think make a good detective story. These include requirements such as "clues must be present to allow the reader to solve the crime" and "a detective with strong intuitive skills" (Class Handout). Two mystery tales that attempted to follow these rules are Poe's own short story, "The Murders in the Rue Morgue," and a movie, The Bone Collector. According to these guidelines, "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" is a better mystery story than The Bone Collector because of the detective's strong but reasonable intuitive skills and the fair clues that are given to the reader. Both stories have detectives present in them. …show more content…

To equal Lincoln, a viewer would have to know about both the murder of a fictional character, "a rich industrialist, Talbot Soames, [who]'d been kidnapped, shot and buried" and that oyster shells were "what they used as landfill in lower Manhattan" (The Bone Collector). Since these pieces of information were only given in the movie after the detective figured out their connection to the crime, they were unreasonable clues. The Bone Collector also has the secondary detective, Amelia Donaghy, use a brief showing of Lincoln's detective badge from earlier in the film to identify Lincoln as the killer's next target. While this theoretically was fair for the viewers, since they could have remembered Lincoln's detective id number, there was almost no chance that they memorized a random five digit number. This is a specific failing of movies, since viewers are unable to go back and look over the evidence previously gathered to come to a conclusion, unlike readers of a short story. Because of a lack of ability for the viewer to use the same evidence that the detectives use, The Bone Collector makes a poor …show more content…

Long before Poe made his rules about detective stories, Aristotle made his own requirements for a tragedy, such as fear, morality, and spectacle. (Class Handout) Poe's story ignores many of the requirements that Aristotle gives for a tragedy. The reader feels no fear in Poe's story because the detective is never in any true danger. In The Bone Collector, the detective is in near constant danger and spectacle is used to convey this fear to the watcher. The Bone Collector also has an element of morality that is entirely missing in Poe's story. At the end of the story, the villain, Marcus Andrews, makes it about more than just the story. He claims that because the detectives couldn't solve the clues, "[the murdered victim's] blood is on [the detectives'] hands" (The Bone Collector). Instead of trying to bring in this morality into Poe's story, Poe instead makes the story about an orangutan that doesn't even have morals. While all this makes The Bone Collector a good tragedy, it does not make it a good mystery, because a mystery requires specific criteria. "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" is a good mystery but a poor Aristotelian tragedy because it is missing these vital

Get Access