In the Hundred Years War, on the eve of Saint Crispin’s day, a speech was made. In the setting of 1415, King Henry IV gave his famous St. Crispin’s day speech to inspire great strength amongst his soldiers. When the King spoke to his soldiers, he rallied them to carry their country to victory. The King reassured his men and brought them together through his use of rhetorical devices such as anaphora, hypophora and simile. Throughout his speech, the King uses continuous repetition. “This day is called the feast of Crispian…And say ‘to-morrow is Saint Crispian’…And say ‘These wounds I had on Crispian’s day.’” He emphasizes that glory and honor will be given to those who fight. People will remember and celebrate this day long after the battle
In Patrick Henry’s “Speech at the Virginia Convention Center”, P. Henry tries to persuade colonist to fight a war against the English; Henry does this through several main rhetorical strategies: ethos, parallelism, and pathos. While using these rhetorical strategies Patrick Henry appeals to their emotions, to their most beloved King, God, and to the structure of his speech. One of the many ways P.Henry uses ethos is when he’s talking about God. Henry makes an appeal to ethos by making God seem more important than the earthly kings, as character and authority prevail over just authority. Henry builds his ethos by expressing a religious passion.
This speech is very intriguing from a rhetorical standpoint because it serves as a pertinent example of an orator taking advantage of a pivotal moment in time by establishing good character, and by making emotional appeals towards an audience, as a means to gain the potential rewards the moment provides. With these thoughts in mind, this paper will apply classic rhetorical concepts of kairos to examine King Henry’s recognition of and capitalization on the kairotic moment he finds himself privy to; of ethos, to examine how King Henry establishes his credibility to his army as a means to gain their trust and goodwill; and of pathos, to examine how King Henry appeals to the army’s emotions in order to influence them to disregard all logic telling them that the King is proposing an unreasonable
In the Patrick Henry’s speech at the Virginia Convention Patrick Henry tries to persuade the colonist to fight a war against the English, he does this through several main rhetorical strategies, imagery, emotional appeal, and allusion. Patrick Henry uses imagery to get the listeners attention, as he relates the to the dumb sailors who would get killed by the sirons cause they would be caught in their beauty and singing. Patrick Henry uses emotional appeal to get the listeners on his side, by bringing up slavery because if they do not fight back they can become slaves. Patrick henry uses allusion so he can get the listeners to fight back, he butters them up and gives them a couple reasons on why they should not fight back but then hit them with the news saying that they have to fight back. Patrick Henrys speech was good because he used Imagery, Emotional appeal, and allusion and that really grabbed the listeners attention and made them go to war.
The mastery of rhetoric sets prominent leaders apart from ordinary people. The ruler of England, Queen Elizabeth (1558-1603), shows this powerful trait through her leadership of England, bringing it to a golden age within 45 years despite being a woman. She delivered the “Speech to the Troops at Tilbury” with the intent to eradicate any form of treachery residing in the army, as well as to warn the soldiers of an imminent attack from King Philip II of Spain. Fortunately for England, the threatening Spanish Armada never reached the shores of Britain. Her clever use of rhetorical strategies such as ethos and pathos animates the soldiers to fight until their last breath for England.
In Patrick Henry’s speech to the Virginian delegates in 1775, he persuades the assembly to fight Great Britain for their independence using the repetition of the word ‘hope’, powerful rhetorical questions and the horrifying images of slavery. Henry uses these rhetorical devices to inspire and convince his audience to take action against Great Britain. Henry repeats the word ‘hope’ at key points in his speech in order to prove that hope is a false illusion and that the colonists need to fight back against Great Britain or their situation will never improve. In line 15, Henry begins by saying that “it is natural for a man to indulge in the illusions of hope.”
Patrick Henry is most remembered for his powerful persuasive oratory. While other orators preached patience, Henry urges war against British with logical appeals, he persuaded the audience members to understand his point of view through common sense, specific evidence, and reasonable explanations and with emotional appeals, he was able to point out his views through imagery and diction, idealized explanations and a powerful connection to the audience. However, the main idea of his speech is to break free from the conformity of Great Britain because it is an easy route taken by many in our society.
In times of war and conflict nations turn to their leaders to guide them and provide an example for their people. FDR is a well known historical figure who was a pillar of strength for the American people during the second world war. In his Day of Infamy speech, FDR tells the American people what they can do after their country has been attacked. In contrast, BH is a leader who has been forgotten by history, he fought for his people and was defeated. In his surrender speech he shows his people that their honor isn't lost because of defeat, These two addresses share their military context but differ in the purposes of the people giving them.
Queen Elizabeth wrote an inspiring speech to the Troops who fought for the Armada about their honor and power over this astonishing war. Alongside, Winston Churchill delivered a majestical yet powerful speech about the issue dealing with battle of Britain and the unifications needing to be healed. Queen Elizabeth and Winston Churchill both delivered exhilarating speeches to their troops and counties with the battle of Britain. The Queen delivers her speech to the courageous group of men and women who fought this rigid, enduring war. While Winston delivers his speech to the House of Commons. While analyzing and juxtaposing these two speeches and their contrastive audiences; it is very mere to see the compelling diction, dynamic emotion used in their speeches.
Subject: Patrick Henry giving a speech to get the people at the House of Burgesses to go to war with Great Britain for their freedom.
He uses the ethos described above to persuade his troops to fight. He does this to give them morale, which is necessary in order to fight. His aim was to lead his men into battle not to lose, but to win. He uses the men's emotions and futures as a reason to fight. Another reason is for the glory of the troop and the glory of England. These men have so much fear that all they can think of are reasons to flee. However, Henry gives the men better reasons to stay and fight. He wants his troop to give it their all and not abandon hope or the fleet. St. Crispin's Day is not a battle to dread. It will be a battle to remember for them, and for all people of England.
Alexander H. Stephen, in the ‘Cornerstone Speech’, firmly stated that, the Confederacy was basically on racial inequality and slavery. He clearly outlined the existing differences between the new nation and the American United States. Stephen made it clear that, the Confederacy of the cornerstone was not primarily of chattel slavery, but the black people subordination benefited the white people. Thus, he tied slavery to race. Confederacy was the origin of the era of apartheid in South Africa. Stephen made declarations that the new government was founded on the great truth , that the negro was not equal on the side of the white people and that, slavery which was to be a subordination to the white race which was superior, was a normal and a natural condition. Stephen criticized the claims of the northern that, African enslavement was a law violation nature and that it was a wrong principle, morally, politically and socially. He clearly put across that his new government had an idea which was exactly different from the northern claims. He argued that, it was a kind of insanity to believe that the Negro will be equal between the white and black people and also that, enslaving the blacks was wrong. He made predictions that, the Confederate constitution has settled all the questions relating to the African slavery which existed among the white people. Stephen’s arguments led to the outbreak of the civil war in 1865 (The Teaching AmericanHistory.org, 2017).
King Henry V began to inspire his army with speeches that gave them pride, courage and hope. Shakespeare’s St. Crispen’s Day Speech puts in perspective how Henry V led his army to fight the French.
The Queen of England, Elizabeth I, in a speech to her troops at Tilbury in 1588, motivates the troops by reminding them of the loyalty of the English subjects and the great power of England. They are in the midst of a war against Spain, and it is obvious that the Spanish armada will soon be approaching, and a battle will soon commence. The Queen’s purpose with her speech is to motivate her troops, to inspire patriotism for their country so they will fight more ferociously and with greater vigor than before in the war against Spain. She does this by adopting a regal, honorable, and reverent tone, asserting her authority while still giving the troops the respect they deserve in a way that shows her loyalty and appreciation for them. She wants her country to win in the war against Spain, which is why her speech must be powerful and elicit strong, immediate responses from her audience.
The earliest of Shakespeare’s plays was Henry V written in 1599. As a whole the play is mostly just a retelling of the battle of Agincourt in the year 1415, featuring the now very famous, “St. Crispin’s Day” speech. However Shakespeare manages to capture the intensity and pure chaos of war while also having a solid undertone about the morality of men and sending a