Salman Rushdie Free Speech

Humanity is an imperfect medium for God’s works. It smears reference lines, is too motile when warmed, and too insoluble when chilled. The perfect balance is a rare and fleeting moment among millennia of failed attempts, and even then, the canvas is only given a short burst of color, fading quickly back into the neutral tones of moral ambiguity. Likewise, in Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses,” the reader is greeted not with a uniform portrait, but with a twisted triptych of Man’s struggle to find God. His accompanying motif, however, is not any deity, but chimaera of his own making-- discernment.

There are many ways to define trolling. Although both authors acknowledgement this issue exists, their definitions and the possible resolutions they each offer are as based on their own perceptions. This is a good example of why it’s so hard to resolve this overall issue under our constitutional right to free speech to begin with. Everyone perceives the problem and solutions in their own, individual way.

In his essay, Reality TV: A Dearth of Talent and the Death of Morality, Salman Rushdie argues that the popularity of reality television shows should both alarm us and enlighten us as we examine their success. What is Rushdie’s primary argument, and in what tone does he make his plea? How well does Rushdie keep our attention as a writer and are his arguments credible? Are his claims supported by hard evidence or merely conjecture? And finally, from this essay what can his audience surmise about Rushdie’s world view, biases and opinions of society at large and the media in particular? As we explore Salman Rushdie’s essay let us keep an open mind even if reality television is our favorite form of entertainment.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech among other valued standards. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceable to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (U. S. Constitution). What does it mean by “Congress shall make no law…abridging freedom of speech?” The framers of the Constitution held the rights to free speech in such utmost regard that they deliberately chose to make it a First Amendment right.

Freedom of Speech, part of the First Amendment, is a privileged right that should not be taken lightly. The Milo Bill is said to protect students’ right to their freedom of speech on school grounds. It was introduced at Tennessee’s State House and is named after Milo Yiannopoulos, a British public speaker who made a career out of “trolling” liberals and gained publicity for uncalled-for acts, such as racist and harassing comments on Twitter, which got him banned from the social media site. Should universities allow this so-called “free speech advocate” appear on campuses, which are followed by violence and protests, or continue to allow students’ to have their First Amendment freely?

Despite the trampling of civil liberties seeming plausible in even the most erroneous of circumstances, there remains the argument of creating unnecessary collateral damage combined with the progressive evolution of moderates into extremists as a result of misjudged assumptions by high ranking government officials. Deepak Chopra; Doctor and infamous public speaker, gives backing to these claims arguing that, “if we do not appease and actually recruit the help of this Muslim world, we're going to have a problem on our hands;” the problem being terrorism. These comments were as a direct result of the Mumbai terrorist attacks

According to Hate Speech, they defined it as speech that is intended to insult, offend, or intimidate a person because of some trait such as race, religion, sexual orientation, or disability (Hate Speech, n.d.). Hate speech can

Simply put, free speech and its integral role in free society is fading, or rather: free society itself is fading. In our homes, we sit in our leather recliners with a can of forget and a bowl of regret, our mouths wide open, our eyes peeled watching our American gods of knowledge and opinion as they place their words into our mouths, into our hearts, and into our brains. And by our gods, we learn of our true identity - our box that our features and characteristics place us in, what we should really be thinking about, and which side of the political "fiesta" that we should be falling for. Likewise, the young adults in American Colleges are being taught standards of socio-ethical appeasement and continuing these “skills” from college into their daily lives: the fabric of American Society, which is a primary factor in the end of the First Amendment right of the American public. The American population is not only controlled (socio-politically) by the desires and politicization in the industries of advertisement and entertainment but also the “corrupted” situation of the American college, which are both extending the dissolution of free speech in the United States.

In “A Devil’s Theory Of Islam,” Edward W. Said reviews a book by Judith Miller. In the book, Miller focuses on Islam in the Middle East, and Islam as a threat to the West. Islam since the eighth century was always known as a religion that contains violence and terror. However, Said says that the violence has mostly affected the Middle Eastern countries by dragging them down into poverty. Said says that Islam’s acts affect its citizens, and powerful Islamic countries are under the control of the United States.

Free speech definitely seems as though it’s being frowned upon nowadays, especially in America- land of the free- or so it was anyway. In case you weren’t fully aware, free speech is a bit of a controversial topic now. It’s kind of taken the ‘It’s all fun and games until someone gets hurt’ approach. You can say whatever you want, but the second it offends someone you’re looked down upon. Criticized by everyone for simply stating what was on your mind.

Islam certainly is considered the second largest religion in the earth. Today, more than ever approximately billion or more of people follow the Islam across the world. Indeed, the majority of Islam’s followers believe that the Islam is a message of peace and tolerance. Meanwhile, they against violence everywhere. Unfortunately, the terrorist attack which occurred in New York City on September 11th, 2001 causes misunderstanding and an unpleasant stereotype of Islam and Islamic societies as the wickedness producer. Nowadays, some of the people particularly who live in the North America and political parties blame the Islam and endeavor to isolate it because they have a phobia from the Islam and Sariah law. The current essay will discuss the

Throughout American history, the foundation on which American democratic principles are based, has been repeatedly tested. In the 1700s, the right of free speech was challenged when President John Adams proposed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Adams attempted to stop the Democratic Republicans such as Thomas Jefferson, from criticizing government decisions. Similarly, during the Civil War President Abraham Lincoln challenged freedom of the press when he took action to restrict the printing of military news. Lincoln ordered his generals in the field to control the press and “crack down on speech critical of his administration” to limit dissent against the war effort. However, one historical era stands out as a decidedly pivotal test of

While this paper explain that hate speech is protected by the First Amendment, which provides a shield to all kinds of expressions, including the messages that might be labeled as offensive, repugnant and hateful. It is also differenciate what constitutes incitement in case of hate and terroristic messages as well as shead the light about the difference in types of hate messages.

Islamic reformation can have a variety of meanings to a wide range of people. To some, those words could be viewed as a vicious attack on traditional morals and values. To someone like Irshad Manji, those words appear as hope. Irshad Manji is an author and activist that calls upon those of Islamic faith to reform their beliefs and ways of thinking. She commonly uses the word, ijtihad, which she defines as a tool for independent thinking within a religion that allows for a more progressive and tolerant mindset. Irshad Manji penned several books to share her beliefs, with her most notable novel, The Trouble with Islam: A Wake-Up Call for Honesty and Change, having been published in dozens of countries as well as downloaded over 500, 000 times

Rushdie shows a great example of the limitation of imagination and intellectual liberty when Haroun says “What’s the point of it? What's the point of stories if they aren’t even true?” (Rushdie 22). Rashid is flabbergasted when his son who used to have this sense of imagination and enjoyed Rashid’s stories has now lost his sense of imagination. Haroun losing his imagination is also an allegorical reference to Rushdie losing his ability to tell stories possibly disappointing his