Scottsboro Boys Summary

Academic Summary: “Alabama Pardons 3 ‘Scottsboro Boys’ After 80 Years” In the article “Alabama Pardons 3 ‘Scottsboro Boys’ After 80 Years” (November 21, 2013), Alan Blinder argues the significance, to the modern world, of the pardons issued recently to three black men falsely accused of sexual assault in a long series of trials that has become known as the “Scottsboro Boys”. Blinder supports his reasoning by describing the history of the lawsuit and the efforts put into the posthumous pardons. For

Courts, 2017, p. 193). In the documentary over the case we see multiple times that the boys were not properly represented in a court of law in respect to counsel. The documentary displays both functionalism and also conflict theory. The definition of functionalism is the relationship between the parts of society. The functionalist perspective focuses primarily on race and socioeconomic status. The Scottsboro Boys were disadvantaged for many reasons. They were African American individuals of low socioeconomic

Depression, nine African American boys faced what is now known as one of America’s most tragic trails in history. These young boys were accused of raping two white girls while riding a train through Alabama. This accusation brought forth a mob of white people in the town of Scottsboro. The boys spent years on trial for this. The first trial was thought to have been the final convention, little did they know it was only the beginning. A second trial was held for the nine boys that shook the entire nation

Eugene Williams, and Olen Montgomery- also known as the Scottsboro boys, were charged with rape by Victoria Price and Ruby Bates. The girls claimed to have been raped by the Scottsboro boys after fighting broke out between them and a group of white men. The alleged crime happened on a train, during that time period hoboing- travelling by train in search of jobs, was incredibly popular. Key witnesses to this trial were the Scottsboro boys, the 15 white men on the train, Dr. R. R. Bridges- the doctor

was surging forward. Even with an abundance of evidence, the verdict was clouded by race and politics several times. With the evidence at hand, Norris must be innocent of rape. Admittedly, Norris is guilty of hoboing on the train ride through Scottsboro, however he is not guilty of the alleged rape of Bates and Price. Dr. Bridges, a trusted medical practitioner concluded that,“ At time of the examination, the girls were both calm, composed, and free of bleeding and vaginal damage. Moreover,

both trials, which impacted the outcome. The Scottsboro Trial consisted of two white girls and a group of black youths. 21 year old Victoria Price and 17 year old Ruby Bates were on a train ride back to their hometown, Huntsville, with a group of seven white boys. A group of 12- 15 black youths were said to have joined the train and, later, a white boy, stepped on Haywood Patterson, a black male’s hand, and a brawl erupted which caused the white boys to be driven out. After this, the white girls

The Scottsboro Boys Trial was a huge case against nine African American men who between the ages 13-19 were accused for sexually assaulting two caucasian women on a train they were falsely and wrongly accused. This case started in 1931 on a train near Paint Rock, Alabama. Eight of the nine young men were convicted and sentenced to death the ninth was sentenced to life in prison. These young men should not have been mistreated while being held and tried without evidence based on their race and sentenced

In Scottsboro, Alabama, March 9, 1931 nine African american boys, Olen Montgomery, Clarence Norris, Haywood Patterson, Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Charles Weems, Eugene Williams, Andy Wright, and Roy Wright were incriminated of rapeing two white women on the subway. As they were accused of raping Ruby Bates and Victoria Price they were put on trial. This trail was long and unfair. On the train the boys were evidently taken away by the sheriff, once Ruby told a posse member (sheriff/police) of

charged and were labelled as communists and un-American by Jack Tenney’s Joint Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities. The activists charged that the boys were not given afforded due process and that the judge in the case, Charles Fricke, displayed prejudice against the boys in his rulings. The young ladies who were with the boys on the night José Díaz was found dying, did not fare any better than their male counterparts. Because of their refusal to cooperate with the authorities, they

this case. It was taken as a joke and it was laughed about rather than frowned upon. Justice was snatched away because of this vulgar “joke”. The Scottsboro Boys Trial, that took place in Alabama from 1931 to 1937, revealed the consequences of false accusations, explained the loss of innocence, and established the miscarriage of justice. The Scottsboro Trials had set a limit to falsely accusing someone and created a legacy of racism that had never been forgotten. “Also discovered aboard were two