In the Book “Maggie: A Girl of The Streets”, (“the tale of a pretty young slum girl driven to brutal excesses by poverty and loneliness,” (Lo)) Stephen Crane depicts selfishness in humanity by showing how living in a poor, poverty stricken, urban area can reduce people to their basic natural instincts by showing how they destroy their chances of progressing foreword, and using brutal tactics, such as selfishness and aggression to survive. He also uses Imagery to show how the filth of the streets that occupies Rum Alley (”An aptly named area where life is centered on working, drinking, and fighting” (dlschirf).) is like an echo of the bowery in which there house is also mentioned to reflect.
In the book, Maggie, Stephan Crane shows the inability for humanity to move forward when stuck in the bowery’s of the poor by showing how when the main character of Crane’s book, Maggie, cleans up the home’s floor and walls, her family ultimately destroys it and when she puts the furniture together again she comes back to find it all broken. So she tries to go out and create a life for herself by working in a cuff factory, “she got a position where they made collars and cuffs” (Crane, Pg.17) but violence and anger destroys her chances, just like her mother destroys the furniture that Maggie keeps putting back together. “When Maggie came home at half-past six her mother lay asleep amidst the wreck of chairs and a table” (Crane, Pg. 21) It is inferred that her mother destroys her chances
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that ALL men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” As you know these words come from the preamble of the Declaration of Independence, perhaps one of the greatest documents ever written. However, I do have a little problem with the last four words sentence, “the pursuit of Happiness” because I believe it actually sends an easily misinterpreted message.
She trekked forward, valiantly, against the aloof, inhospitable environment. Around her, she witnessed as the rudimentary surroundings drove individuals away as if it never wished for accost. Despite this she continued to trudge forward, despondently, waiting for a sign-- anything to warn her if she ought to continue or if she ought to give up. Eventually, she persisted. Ann Petry, in her novel The Street, explores the dynamic relationship between Lutie Johnson and the unfriendly urban setting through the articulate use of dramatic personification and vivid imagery as a metaphor for the uncertainty that ensues when relocating in a new, diverse, and vastly dissimilar environment.
“Maggie” is a story that is pessimistic. It is not only a story of a character who ultimately succumbs to her situation by becoming a prostitute because she feels she has no other way if supporting
The authors are able to convey the theme of poverty by creating similar settings in New York City and Ireland. Lutie, the main character of The Street, walks down the frigid sidewalk of New York observing the setting surrounding her. The author illustrates the cold by writing, “She shivered as the cold fingers of the wind touched the back of her neck…” (Petry). This quote shows the way the author portrays the wind. She uses personification to give it life.
The Progressive Era gave reformers concerns about the poor of American cities. Many developed the view that poverty was a result of some people’s characters and not their environmental and social condition. This brought up the argument and idea of the deserving poor versus the non-deserving poor. This alluded to the thought that character made a person poor and not that being poor made the character. However, Stephen Crane’s short story Maggie: A Girl of the Streets critiques many of these ideas. His biggest critique was that of religion and the standards and hypocrisy of it. This essay will argue that Crane critiques the hypocrisy of Christianity and Christians through the characterization of a wide range of characters in his novel.
For our Economics subject, we watched The Pursuit of Happyness, a movie based on Chris Gardner, a salesman who was not making that much money and eventually experiences homelessness with his five-year old son. He faces problems when his wife is unwilling to accept his goal to become a stockbroker and leaves him. However, he perseveres even under all this stress.
In Stephen Crane's novel, "Maggie, A Girl of the Streets", there is a great deal of moral development in the life of Maggie Johnson, the protagonist of the story. Throughout the novella, she undergoes a great deal of emotional, mental, and physical turmoil after a series of events leaves her out on the streets. Because she has no choice but to fend for herself, she does some questionable things herself, and ultimately becomes a completely different person, with different characters having a hug influence on her behavior and decisions. Crane uses a variety of literary devices such as mood, similes, and imagery to convey the struggles to the reader, as well as give a clear picture of what the lives of Maggie and others were like during this time.
When it comes to predicting how something will make you feel in the future, you will most likely be wrong. In the book Discovering Pop Culture, edited by Anna Romasino, is the article “The Futile Pursuit of Happiness”. In the article, author Jon Gertner talks about how people think certain things bring them happiness but aren’t as fulfilling as they may think. Gertner gives examples by writing about four men that have been questioning how people predict what will make them happy and how they feel after it happens. Among these men are a psychology professor Daniel Gilbert, psychologist Tim Wilson, economist George Loewenstein, and psychologist Daniel Kahneman. Gertner uses facts from scores of
Their family is poor, and to add onto this, their parents drink a lot and abuse them to the point where they live in fear. This is where and when the children become scarred to the point of no return. They knew of their terrible home life and as Jimmie declared on the streets "My home reg'lar livin' hell! Damndes' place! Reg'lar hell! Why do I come an' drin' whisk' here thish way? 'Cause home reg'lar livin' hell!”(952). There was no real way for them to escape their home, all Jimmie could do was go out and find trouble by drinking and yelling. This sets the tone for cranes foreshadowing that despite wanting to leave the slums, they will not have a way out because they were destined to be there and knew no way out. Stephen crane is an extreme realist and naturalist. In cranes naturalist themed stories, no one escapes the biological chains that hold them to the ways of life they are trying to escape. The slums is an environment that creates and fosters to weak people and this mindset and way of life is passed down to further generations. This makes the later generations weak as well and they become trapped victims of the Bowery
Poverty. The scarcity of certain necessities such as money, is faced by almost one-half of the world population. Everyday, 3,000,000 people live off $2.50, fighting to keep themselves alive. A realistic view of those living in poverty first started to appear in the late 1800s and the early 1900s, which was known as the realism era. In the novel, Maggie: A Girl of the Streets by Stephen Crane, poverty is portrayed in a realistic way. Crane Informs readers how underprivileged people actually live, and how the environment they live in, such as their family, can mentally affect individuals. Similarly, an individual's cognitive functions can also be affected by a person's environment. Cognitive functions are mental processes that control one’s attention, or the ability to undertake information; as a result, cognitive functions can be negatively affected by the environment of poverty. Therefore, a person living in poverty may lack important cognitive function because of their environment, causing parenting to be a challenge.
People are dying every minute because of this terrible disease. No antidotes have been found to eliminate it. Poverty is like an epidemic with no antidote affecting the entire world. It has already killed billions of people, and will continue killing unless we do something to stop it. Have you ever thought what living in poverty is like? Seeing a shocking picture in which people were trying to survive gave me a whole different perspective. That image showed me one of the poorest areas of the planet where people were living under despicable conditions. They were working in sweatshops, collecting garbage and living in broken down huts in order to survive. A polluted river passes across from their humble homes, causing incomparable complication to their lives. I could observe the terrible conditions in which this people are working, fishing and collecting garbage. Not only pollution is shown in this photo, above of the photograph a bridge could be observed. I imagine the noise, and the dust that this little detail brings to their lives. That photograph made me feel angry at politicians because they could do a better job helping the needy. Since they were almost dying, I felt sad for the circumstances they live in. A sense of admiration for the way they are able to survive, gave me the strength to fight against this global scourge. The author of this picture is trying to convey a message, showing us poverty in all its faces and inviting us to be part of his fight against
Selfishness. A personality trait that only bad people have. Incorrect. Selfishness is part of the nature of every living human being. Despite what all humans may believe selfishness is a part of all of us and is the driving force behind everything we do. In order to survive humans must be selfish and think of their own needs above other peoples. We must be selfish to our surrounding environment by using the resources essential to humans that our environment bears. Strangely enough it is often considered an insult to be called selfish.
Most of us assume that selfishness is both wrong and unhealthy. But is this true?
In Stephen Crane’s book Maggie: A Girl of the Streets there are various themes, one of them is the impact of the social environment. The impact of social environment is how people are products of their own environment and people are who they grew up to be due to the conditions, people, and environment that surrounds them. The Bowery is 14 blocks and has 82 bars there that make alcohol very accessible to the residents, including children. The Bowery has a negative impact on people and even children that live there. The Bowery is a concrete jungle where only the strong survive. The living conditions are unquestionably poor and the tenements where they live is full of immigrants. The kids in the Bowery live with alcoholic and abusive parents, pregnant women who are not married, and finally prostitutes. Maggie, Jimmie, and Pete are all characters that deserve forgiveness due to Stephen Crane message, people are products of their own environment and deserve forgiveness.
It is common sense that all the human beings would like to live a happy life and they will spare no efforts in order to realize the purpose of really living a happy life in the end. However, different people have different definitions toward what a happy life is and they tend to have different standards as for how a life is that can be regarded as a happy life. There is no doubt that people will then try different means in order to pursue a happy life based on their definition toward what a happy life is. Therefore, the following will talk about the pursuit of a happy life from the perspectives of both Dalai Lama in The Art of Happiness and Viktor E. Frankl in Man’s Searching for Meaning, during which the experiences of some characters from the film Forrest Gump will be applied as evidence. Generally speaking, the pursuit of a happy life in the minds of Dalai Lama and Viktor E. Frankl can be achieved via experiencing sufferings and adversity. It is hoped that this analysis can help people understand what a happy is from a different point of view.