Sentencing For Life Essay

Some of the arguments in support of death penalty are it decreases the chance of crime rate. In absence of death penalty there is higher chance of increase in crime rate. According to the time magazine, an estimated two hundred thousand people in United States have been victims of some kind of crimes. With not proper law criminals will feel more free to commit heinous crimes. To secure the community and create a sense of fear in criminals to commit horrible crimes, there is a need for death penalty.

Corporations cannot be incarcerated. Nor can they be put to death. Otherwise, corporations and individuals face many of the same consequences following conviction. Corporations can be fined. They can be placed on probation. They can be ordered to pay restitution. Their property can be confiscated. They can be barred from engaging in various types of commercial activity.

The official definition of capital punishment is “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime” (merriam webster.com). In what atrocious world would killing someone be legal? Even if they committed a crime of ruthless nature, what will they learn from being killed right away. These people need time to deem themselves unfit for the world. They need to learn from the actions they have chosen to take, and the only way this is possible is life without parole. Life without parole-or LWOP is not only less expensive, but more effective than the death penalty. Life without parole is the swiftest and easiest way to punish someone who deserves it. It is a certain sentence. The people in prison will die of natural causes unless proven innocent anyways “A life without parole can be more demoralizing than a death sentence. It’s the death of hope.” -Steven Drizin

The debate on the death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in the United States. Much of this is attributed to the fact that today; very few developed countries still use capital punishment. In fact, only 21 countries carried out capital punishment in 2012. There are many reasons to ban the death penalty. The death penalty can be very inaccurate, it fails at deterring crime, and costs more tax dollars. There is no reason to keep an obsolete method of punishment like the death penalty in such a developed country like the United States, especially when it has no statistically proven benefits.

Are young offenders truly deserving of life sentences in prison? There are many people who advocate the idea that JLWOP (Juvenile Life Without Parole) should end and underage children deserve a chance to prove they can change. These supporters argue that these kids are still maturing and putting them in prison robs them of the chance to turn their lives around. Meanwhile, there are those who believe that, in some cases, it is necessary to put them behind bars for life. Because these offenders should face the consequences for the wrongdoing, the sentence of life without parole for juveniles is fair in some scenarios.

When conducting an informal research regarding the death penalty versus life in prison, many people responded with the “Give ‘em the death penalty and save us the tax payers money” and “I bet they will think twice before taking a life”. The statement regarding saving taxpayers’ money can be no more farther from the truth. The average death row inmate in Alabama may wait to be executed for an average of 14 years, as reported by the Alabama Department of Corrections. The judicial system does have articles for violent and non-violent offenders. When discussing life in prison without possibility of parole versus the Death Penalty, my argument focuses on violent offenders. Violent offenders in Alabama is an offender who has been convicted of a

In fact, according to some research, Dieter states, “In California, capital trials are six times more costly than other murder trials.” (Dieter 1) If the death penalty was abolished, and prisoners that were usually sentenced to death row were sentenced to a life without parole, then it would cost so much less. There isn’t any reason to continue with the unethical practice of sentencing people to death row if it’s not cost-efficient. Also, when Sandy Banks is talking about economics, she states, “Economics undoubtedly drive some of that shift. Taxpayers have spent more than $4 billion on capital punishment since 1978. That translates to $308 million for every execution.” (Banks 1) That’s a lot of money. If there wasn’t so much money being spent on the death penalty, it could be put towards another cause, something that will benefit society as a whole. Having the death penalty just means that the taxpayers will have to spend even more money. Now, some may say that these prisoners deserve their fate. For example, Greg Dobbs, who, when talking about murderer Nathan Dunlap, stated, “He deserved the fate he sealed for them.” (Dobbs 1) Although some may believe this, it just isn’t ethical to take life away from a human being. If somebody steals something, are they going to be punished by having someone steal something from them? So why should the punishment for killing someone be getting killed? As well, the death penalty has been shown to not deter any crimes, so what’s the point? People shouldn’t wish death upon even their worst enemy. It just doesn’t make sense to spend so much money on the death penalty when it doesn’t help anything

A second reason why is the death penalty should be used is, it cost less than life in prison, stating the death penalty cost “at least $2 million a case.” Whereas life without parole will cost “$1.2 million-$3.6 million” which is more than equal a death sentence. In a sense keeping a person in jail for life is worst “because most of the time he will appeal just as much as many costs as a convict under the death sentence.” (Death Penalty Cost, 2017). Not only the death sentence is cost-effective but is better off than keeping the convict in jail for life.

George W. Busch once said, “I support the death penalty because I believe, if administered swiftly and justly, capital punishment is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives”. Now you need to ask yourself why you are for or against this issue, and how it affects the world. I think that they should take away the death penalty it is costly and can be delayed. The problem is the cost to the United State of having the death penalty, the cause of it costing so much is the delays of people on death row and keeping them there, and the solution to this is eliminating the death penalty or making it a swifter way to execution.

It helps deter societies criminals.(The Supreme court & capital punishment) With knowing they have a risk of being killed it will deter them from committing heinous crimes. Criminals need this fear of death or our society would fall the shambles. The absence of Death Penalty would make the Death rate increase(reconsidering old debate) With murders knowing the worst convention they could get is time in jail it would make them kill more with less guilt.To sum up Capital punishment benefits society and keeps people

Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sentence must be less deterrent than a death sentence. And we must execute murderers as long as it is merely possible that their execution protects citizens from future murder.

The death penalty is a serious problem that has the United States very divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty three states where the death penalty is legal and seventeen states that have abolished it . I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. Crime is all around, Wherever we look we find criminals and crime. Criminals have become a part of peoples daily lives,Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option left to survive, but some do it for thee own enjoyment. I do not think death penalty should be used for everybody whos commited a crime of some sort . A person, who stole food or something from a grocery store,

Right now, we may observe that when criminals are just being put into prison, crimes are still going on and it became more and more. It is like criminals are still being given the freedom to do things again and again. So with death penalty, it may help lessen the crimes and it may create an effective way to ban criminals. With this penalty, it may lead people in giving up for committing a crime. First, people may or would think twice or more than twice with their decisions and second, people may change their minds and would decide to not commit a crime. Also with death penalty, it may allow the people to be afraid in committing a crime in their life. Study also shows that having this penalty aims to discourage others from doing or committing a

The death penalty is not the most effective form of punishment for criminals. The death penalty is hypocritical; it condemns killing by killing people. Many supporters of capital punishment cite retribution as being a justification for the death penalty; however, no matter what the circumstance, murder is never justified. Ghandi once said “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” Two wrongs can never make a right. Capital punishment should be abolished because while even though many supporters of the death penalty claim that it prevents crime, there is no evidence that it has been proven to do so. Also, many people support the death penalty because it prevents criminals from ever being allowed back on the streets to commit further

The death penalty is uncivilized and unfair in practice and life in prison is a better form of discipline and a much more effective deterrent in preventing crime (ACLU, 2012). A life in prison involves the punishment to go on for decades, because