There is a raging theme between both works that has to deal with a father/son relationship. With Amir just wanting his own father's approval, and Oedipus murdering his father (and sleeping with his mother, but that’s not really “important” right now”).
Starting with Oedipus Rex, he was not aware that he was doing anything wrong. It was “his duty” to do so. For it was in the oracle of laius that if her were to have a son, that he would be murdered by said child. “The oracle tells Laius that if he does have a son, his son will kill him”. He wanted to carry on his legacy so he still had a child, but sent him off. Of course he comes back to find out that he did murder his own father and ends up blinding himself, but that doesn't happen in
…show more content…
He will be hated wherever he goes.” Oedipus Rex, pg. 34. This shows that Oedipus is stuck between a rock and a hard place, or as another saying goes, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. What this means is that, such as Laius, Oedipus must either die or leave where he stands. Laius decides he would have a son anyways knowing that he would still probably die.
“I ran. A grown man running with a swarm of screaming children. But I didn't care. I ran with the wind blowing in my face, and a smile as wide as the Valley of Panjsher on my lips. I ran.” The Kite Runner, pg. 371. Here we see that amid has finally gotten what he wanted. Whether it was the preferred objective or not, he was happy. He was in peace, and that's all that matters. Just like in the end of Oedipus, he found out who murdered his father. He may not have been happy with the result, but he still got what he wanted.
That is the biggest theme/question between both stories (at least in my opinion). Is getting what you want really worth it? Amir moved to the states, yes, he was happy with sohrab, and is happy with his father. While oedipus ended up blinding himself for the rest of his life with his wife/mother dead. Having to live with the constant pain knowing that you may not be “whole” ever again.
Amir is fulfilled knowing that him and his father are better now, and oedipus is blind. Seems kind of like polar opposites, but they still have a connection. Oedipus finally figured out
Oedipus Rex and King Lear are, as their titles announce, both about kings. These two plays are similar in theme and in the questions they pose to the audience. The kings in each play both fall from the pinnacle of power to become the most loathed of all classes in society; Oedipus discovers that he is a murderer and committer of incest, and Lear becomes a mad beggar. Misjudgments occur in both plays, and the same questions about the gods, fate, and free will are posed. In spite of these similarities, however, the final effects of these two plays differ greatly.
In my opinion, Oedipus does not deserve what he got and is a victim of fate. This is because all his actions were unintentional. However, some of his actions were ignorant. Right from the beginning we see how Oedipus was envisioned to kill his father and marry his mother, thus his feet being pinned together and him
Oedipus, on the other hand, is not so content with the events unfolding in his life. He is persistent in finding the truth surrounding King Laius’s death. “To protest Apollo is necessarily dialectical, since the pride and agility of the intellect of Oedipus, remorselessly searching out the truth, in some sense is also against the nature of truth. In this vision of reality, you shall know the truth, and the truth will make you mad” (Bloom 10). His investigation leads him to discover the truth surrounding the prophecy in which he kills his father and sleeps with his mother. During this whole play, Oedipus is never really content with anything.
Although Oedipus’s fate was already determined, he is not just a mere puppet of the gods, meaning he can control his own life. Before full knowledge of his unintentional incest, he tries to flee town in order to avoid marrying his mother. By doing this he is taking matters
The Kite Runner and Osama are very correspondent and very different. The differences between Osama and The Kite Runner are as followed: in Osama the story was based around on a girl and what she went through, the agitations of women in the Taliban, and a lot more brutality was in this rather than in The Kite Runner. In, The Kite Runner the Taliban wasn’t as prominent in the beginning as to where in Osama that was the main aspect of the movie. In The Kite Runner, there was definitely sadness, and the martyrdom of the people, but it wasn’t as bad as Osama. The similarities between the two: The Taliban are taking over the county, Hassan takes up for Amir like Espandi takes up for Osama, both are Middle
*INTRO*The character Oedipus in the play Oedipus the King by Sophocles, and the character Othello in the play Othello the Moor of Venice by Shakespeare are both tragic characters. Oedipus ends up killing his father, and marrying and having children with his mother, whereas Othello ends up mistrusting and killing his wife. These two individuals have similarities and differences in several aspects such as the roundness of their characters, the retribution that they incur upon themselves and upon their respective wives whether directly or indirectly, and their horrors.
Oedipus has spent all his life running from his fate. He has, we learn, been told that he is fated to kill his father and marry his mother. And he refused to accept that fate. He has spent much of his life moving around, so as to avoid his fate. It was a
In terms of the two protagonists' legacy, they generally started in the same situation, both men having to work to achieve success. Oedipus was saved by a shepherd as a newborn when he was sentenced to death by his father solely on the notice that when Oedipus grew up , he would kill his father and bear children with his mother. To escape execution, he was taken to Corinth and was then adopted and raised as the child of the king and queen. Never knowing of the identity of his true parents, he fled when he was told of his unchanging fate and left his home in pursuit to try to escape the path set for him by the gods. Once he felt he was protected from those disdainful occurences, he becomes very prideful of his "triumph" over the gods and loses his trust and loyalty to those he thought he refuted as does his wife. They aren't true believers of the ancient Greek gods and only worshiped when it proves to be most convenient to them not because they truly seek guidance from a higher power. They present sacrifices and pray when they were in times of need, otherwise they would mock the gods and prophecies. "You prophecies of the gods, where are you now? This is the man who Oedipus feared for years, he fled him, not to kill
Lonely, desperate, and distraught. I felt these emotions everyday as a child, because I was the weird kid, the odd one out. I let people walk all over me just so they would accept me into their clique. I abided to all of my peers demands, even if I did not want to, just so that I could have someone to invite to my birthday party. In the novel, The Kite Runner, written by Khaled Hosseini, there is a similar situation between two of the main characters: Amir and Hassan.
Instead of taking time to consider his decision, he quickly sent Oedipus to the mountains with his feet bound together. King Laius failed to examine every possible outcome, like the shepherd not completing the assigned task, and it resulted in his demise. If he had taken the alternative route of keeping Oedipus as his own, Oedipus would have never killed his father and married his mother. Years later, Oedipus makes the impulsive decision to leave Corinth
Oedipus’ fate is foretold by the gods and he tries quite desperately to escape said fate whereas Amir entirely determines his own fate. In Oedipus Rex, the author facilitates a sense of powerless in humankind via making Oedipus’ downfall inexorable. Despite Oedipus’ disempowerment he still attempts to redeem himself disregarding the fact that his fate was foretold by the higher powers that be. This makes Oedipus an immensely pitious character and quite frankly disempowers
As outlined in the proposal, Oedipus is a tragic hero even though he didn't die because of the facts described by Aristotle satisfies the character of Oedipus. In this story the character's egotism and self-centrism has caused him a different fate, drawing attention of the audiences on the issues that the human behaviors directly affect the human emotions as Oedipus blinded his eyes by himself after finding out the truth. Here the hunger for the truth overshadowed by his grandiosity as explained by Miller has made Oedipus to find out what he hadn't expected. He was just willing to help somebody but as it was overcame from his confidence and proud, the story is able to manipulate the audience's feeling and make feel sorry for the character even though it is already known to the audiences that Oedipus was wrong, as seen from his confident and proud actions. While in Thelma and Louise, the feelings generated to the audience are different. Unlike Oedipus, in Thelma and Louise the human feelings were not played ironically but instead were diverted from characters actions from one wrong action to series of others. Oedipus ends in misery and sorrow of his past but Thelma and Louise ends up surrounded by the results of their wrong activities, which they tried to overcome by running away from it rather than facing it like Oedipus. At the end too, both tragedy shows the different perspective of life. One is with full of pride and
The peripeteia in each of these stories differs, but in the end the characters almost come to the same fate. The turning point in Oedipus, where things starting to go down hill, is when the messenger comes in and says that Polybus and Merope were not his real parents, thus proving that the prophecy was true and reveals that Oedipus did indeed kill his father and marry
Beginning with the character of Oedipus, while the physical journey lasts the course of a day, his mental journey originates at his own birth, where his own internal passage spans all the way back to his origin. The conflict that arises from the circumstances surrounding this lead into the encompassing self-tribulation that will be the theme of his journey, with his inner shifting subconsciousness affecting the outer events of his journey. The journey’s catalyst was his decision to seek the murderer of the prior king, leading into his confrontation with the elderly seer and planting the first seeds of doubt. Going from his assuredness in addressing the people prior, we now have insight to the depths of his pride at even the slightest hint that all is not well with his identity, progressing him in having to turn his search inwardly and preparing
Oedipus and Abraham had similar journeys throughout their life because they both were given a fate and destiny. In Abrahams story, he was told by God to kill his one in only son. Abrahams son meant the world to him, he struggled for several years with making a child with his wife. After many failures, she allowed him to conceive a child with one of their slaves because she knew how bad he wanted a child. God gave Abraham this task because he knew if he would follow this order he would do anything he ever tells him to do. As God instructed him to do, Abraham took his son and bounded him to the alter. Abraham grabbed the knife to kill his son and right before he was going to strike him, God stopped him and said do not lay a hand on the boy, now I know that you will do anything for me.