Social Security - Privatize Yes/No

2497 Words10 Pages
The United States Social Security System is often considered a political football, frequently debated on whether the government should continue to manage it or should it be privatized. Either way, in today’s economy, it’s vital to the welfare of many. The main purpose of the system is to provide benefits to America’s workers and their families for retirement, disability, and early death. (Unknown Social Security ProCon) According to the data collected in the 2000 census, “Social Security is the main source of income for men and women 65 and older.” (Hartmann, Lee Highbeam) This finding proves people have become to depend on the government for this benefit, and for a multitude of reasons are not saving enough money to live on once they…show more content…
“A 1972 amendment tied increases in Social Security retirement benefits to increases in the Consumer Price Index. In 1974, Social Security insurance was taken over by the Social Security Administration, and in 1983 an amendment allowed partial taxation of the benefits given to upper-income recipients. In 1999, payroll deductions for Social Security were set at 6.2% of annual wages below $72,600, and payroll deductions for Medicare were 1.45% of annual wages (no upper limit), with employers contributing matching amounts.” (Columbia Encyclopedia Infoplease) The rates previously listed continue to increase, often annually. The Social Security tax for 2010 is 6.2% of the first $106,800. Earnings above that are exempt from additional tax. In addition to the Social Security tax, all employee’s taxable earnings are taxed a 1.45% Medicare tax. Both taxes must be matched by the employer. (Averkamp Accounting Coach) With all the tax revenue being generated, the next question often asked is; what is the best approach for investing it. This again, often leads to controversy. “Social Security funds are invested in federal securities, mainly long-term bonds. In 1997 a government advisory panel proposed that some of the revenues be invested in stocks and bonds to generate higher returns. The panel was divided over whether the money should be invested by the government or by individuals, as well as the amount that should be shifted
Open Document