Stand Trial Case Summary

Judge Reibman held a hearing in Oct. 2014 on contempt charges against Dr. Kolecki for not showing up at the evaluation, but the charges were later dropped. Dr. Kolecki thought there was ex parte communication between the judge and Mrs. Kolecki’s attorney, Waldron, but later agreed that wasn’t the case.

The first witness was identified as Decalle McGowan, Mother of Alphonos Jr, Tashima Johnson and fiance of Alphonso Johnson Sr, and the second as Sharifa Derry,sister of Alphons Johnson, Jr. Both witnesses claimed once they arrived to the location a large fight began, and both of them observed a black male go up to both of the victims and repeatedly strike both with what appear to be a hand knife several times. McGowan stated that she arrived at the scene along with her family, and she saw the unknown male walk to the rear of a car and then attack her family.The two female witnesses provided a written statement of the events. The statement provided by the females concurs in great part with all the other testimonies. Decalle McGowan was transported by police officers to a location where she was able to positively identify Lonnie Taylor as the person of interest in this

Sylvia Burwell Secretary of Health and Human Services Petitioners vs Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation vs Secretary of Health and Human Services (U.S 2014)

Ms. Chaker to separately create duplicative sets of discovery to each of the Defendants is unnecessary here. Given their trustee-beneficiary relationship, defendants are of an aligned interest in this matter. Ms. Chaker seeks to assert her rights against both Ms. Lindstrom and Ms. Lindstrom-Blech under the same claims, and would provide identical discovery to each defendant even if they were served separately. Thus, even if Ms. Chaker separately served Defendants with discovery defining “you” and “your” for each individual, but otherwise identical, Defendants would provide the same responses as already furnished, and would most likely answer provide answers applicable to Defendants collectively.

Laci Peterson, a 27-year-old wife who was eight months pregnant, disappeared on December 24, 2002. When the body of the California woman and her unborn child were found four months later, her husband, Scott, was charged with two counts of murder. Detective Craig Grogan gave a sworn statement that he had probable cause to believe Mr. Peterson committed two counts of the crime of 187 Penal Code, homicide, on or about December 23 or 24 of 2002, in the county of Stanislaus. April 17, 2003 the Judge of the Superior Court in Stanislaus County, California issued a warrant for the arrest of Scott Lee Peterson. The court found that the District Attorney’s office did, in fact, have probable cause to bring Scott Peterson in. The Judge specifically

On Wednesday, a judicial ruling in Colorado has again declared that Robert Lewis Dear, 57, who was accused of killing three people in an abortion clinic in Colorado Springs, is mentally incompetent to appear in court. This ruling followed a report from Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo Museum (CMHIP) where Dear has been undergoing mental therapy since May.

Please select several dates in the near future to schedule Ms. Lawrencia Smalls for an appointment with Pat, you, and myself. I will facilitate the meeting. The objective of the meeting is to review all the information from Ms. Lawrenica Smalls' last case, the Impartial Hearing Officer's decision, and the Administrate review. If nothing has changed in regards to the Ms. Lawrencia Smalls circumstances and if Lawrencia does not activity participate in the meeting. At this time it may appear the status quo remains the same.

Based on our communication, please find attached information in regard of payments for your court cost in General session court. Please address your payment to Clerk of Court/General Session, PO Box 8002, Anderson, SC 29622. If you wish to receive a recipe, please sent return envelope with you

Plaintiff’s petition alleges three issues with the agency’s action under K.S.A. 77-621, but none of the three issues meet muster under the law. The three issues they allege are 1) the agency action is unconstitutional; 2) the agency engaged in unlawful procedure or has failed to follow prescribed procedure; and 3) the agency action is based on a determination of fact that is not supported by evidence that is substantial when viewed in light of the whole record. These three issues represent the only grounds that the Plaintiff has chosen to challenge Fort Hayes State University’s decision on and so under the statute they are the only grounds which this Court can consider. Neither the law, nor the facts of this case support a decision to overturn FHSU’s decision to suspend Herrel.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Kanawha County residents met Tuesday to learn more information about payments from a court settlement related to the 2014 Elk River chemical spill.

Five years after the incident, U.S. District Court Judge Ruben Castillo, who was responsible in

Raymond John Clark III was arrested for the murder Annie Le. Her body was found in a basement at her a laboratory building that she worked at on the day that she was supposed to get married. Crime scene investigators found DNA and blood evidence that belonged to Clark. He pleaded guilty and is currently being charged with 44 years of imprisonment. There was no clarification or reason given by Clark as to why he assaulted Le and committed the murder.

On November 2, 2000 Erma Stewart was arrested along with twenty six others because authorities were under the suspicion that they had been involved with the distribution of an illegal substance. Stewart was jailed and had her bond set to $70,000. She was then appointed a public defender to handle her case. However, Stewart claims that the attorney pressured her into pleading guilty despite her insistence that she was innocent. After spending a month in jail with the knowledge that her children had no to look after them, due to her being a single parent, Stewart conceded and plead guilty to the charges. She was made to pay a fine of $1,000 and was sentenced to 10 years of probation.

The first tier of the federal court system is the US District Court. There is a total of “94 district or trial courts” in the United States, “Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Northern Marina Islands” (Court Role and Structure). The cases that are handled in the US District Courts are considered “criminal activity” by Congress and include but is not limited to, “interstate theft of an automobile, involvement in terrorist activities, illegal importation of narcotics” but for the last ten (10) years most have been cases like “embezzlement and fraud, larceny and theft” and “drug-related offenses” (Carp, Stidham, & Manning, 2014). Another case heard in the US District Court is that of robbery; which is a type of case that is “uniform in occurrence in each of the ninety-four U.S. judicial

Five years later, since December of 2011, two federal judges have found Joseph guilty of not following and abiding to the injunction, still having misbehavior in police conduct. U.S. District Judge G. Murray stated that he was saying false statements of his department, and that Arpaio and his chief deputy , “have a history of obfuscation and subversion of this Court’s orders that is as old as this case and did not stop after they themselves became the subjects of civil contempt.” The judge understood based on his mannerisms that he had no desire to declare the truth or comply with answering the asked questions. So the judge decided to charge Joe Arpaio of criminal contempt of court, with a possible sentence of six moths in the county jail.