Break Even Analysis
Workplace, International is re-evaluating the design, cost and profitability of its line of office accessories. Currently, the items are constructed of metal-based parts for durable and consistent performance. At the time of the initial process decision, the metal drawing process was also the most economical. Management now suspects that the cost advantage enjoyed by metal parts is highly dependent on the volume of parts produced. To confirm their suspicions, management would like you to compare the break-even volume for one of its products, the 3-hole punch, when fabricated from metal versus plastic. What decision can be made based on the individual break-even points of each process?
Metal Drawing Process
…show more content…
Outsourcing
Outsourcing
Metal Drawing Process
Metal Drawing Process
50 000 + 5V = 8V 8V - 5V = 50 000 V = 50 000 3 V = 16 667#
If demand/production is less than or equal to 16 667, the alternative with the lowest/zero fixed cost, Outsourcing, should be chosen. If demand/production is greater than or equal to 16 667, the alternative with the lowest variable cost, Metal Drawing Process, is preferred.
Total Cost for Break-Even $133 335
Dollars
16 667
Point of Indifferent
Unit
25 000
100 000
75 000
50 000
150 000
175 000
200 000
125 000
Outsourcing
Metal Drawing Process
Choose
Metal Drawing Process
Choose
Outsourcing
Total Cost for Break-Even $133 335
Dollars
16 667
Point of Indifferent
Unit
25 000
100 000
75 000
50 000
150 000
175 000
200 000
125 000
Outsourcing
Metal Drawing Process
Choose
Metal Drawing Process
Choose
Outsourcing
Step 3: From the calculation above, the management consider that 16 557 unit of demand/production is the break-even point for the whole three processes. Compare the fix cost and the variables cost three processes between Metal Drawing Process, Outsourcing and Plastic
Gabe's Auto produces and sells an auto part for $30.00 per unit. In 2010, 100,000 parts were
If the company decided to sell the new product at price of D.Cr. 8.20, that means the full fixed expense of 1.20 is covered and the company will make high profit. However, the selling price of D.Cr. 8.20 is very high and under this price the company will sell the new product at a lower volume than what the company planned sale volume in the budget and that will affect the company in the market as a strong competitor in the food manufacturing. According to the case, the company sales volume drop to 30 tons when the product was sold at the price of D.Cr. 8.2. Thus, my recommendation are as follows:
The most suitable costing method Yeltin should adopt is the practical capacity in order to remove the factor of uncertain budgeted sales figure. For this approach and the practical capacity of 65000-22000 units, then the revised overhead costs come out to be $30. With the inclusion of material and labor costs, the cost of the cartridge stand at $52 and the additional royalty expense of $10 raises the overall per unit cost to $62. The selling price of the cartridge is fixed at $150. With this selling price, the gross margin is equal to $88. The gross margin percentage is equal to 59%. In comparison to the budgeted volume, the gross margin has increased by 14%. See below
The budget analysis shows that the labor hours of the firm are higher than the budgeted amount. As such, the firm needs to evaluate the cost benefit analysis of making or buying their products. To make this decision, various factors need to be considered. Before making the decision, Peyton needs to evaluate the marginal costs and revenue of making versus buying the products. The firm should take the option which provides the highest marginal profit which is the
Certificate of Deposit is a savings note issued by a bank to a depositor who places funds in saving for a set period.
To find the break-even point for napkins, you use the same formula. The fixed cost is still $420,000.00. The selling price of napkins is $7.00. The variable cost is $4.50. $7.00 minus $4.50 is $2.50. So then you take $420,000.00 and divide it by $2.50 to find the breaking point of $168,000.00. The company will have to sell $168,000.00 to break even in sales. The margin for safety for napkins is -$48,000.00. This is found by subtracting the actual or expected cost of $120,000.00 by the break-even point of $168,000.00. You can cut sales by $48,000.00 and not sustain a loss.
3. Market research estimates that monthly equipment production could be increased to 3,500 units which is well within production capacity limitations, if the price were cut from $1,580 to $1,400 per unit. Assuming the cost behavior patterns implied by the data in Exhibit 1 are correct, would you recommend that this action be taken? What would be the impact on monthly sales, costs, and income?
Since material cost is one of the key cost drivers for the production of the units, it is best to take
4. Calculate each of the three product’s break-even points using the data in Exhibit 3. Why is the sum of these three volumes not equal to the 1,100,000 units aggregate break-even volume?
“Companies can choose to use the accounting job order costing method when they have a single product line or numerous products to manufacture. However, it is less costly and less time-consuming if they elect to use process costing when calculating the manufacturing of a single product line. With similarities
If Marlene Herbert were to discontinue place mats, he would miss $270,000 that will go toward Mendel paper company fixed cost. The company currently has a plant overhead that is estimated at $420,000 for the quarter. In addition to the fixed plant overhead, the plant incurs fixed selling and administrative expenses per quarter of $118,000. This draws the company to a total fixed cost of $538,000. If Marlene Herbert were to discontinue the second highest contributor to the fixed cost, he would need to increase the volume of computer paper and lower material cost to help pull the contribution margin of the lowest product up to help support the lost of a whole product line.
3) Using the budget Data, what was the total expected cost per unit if all manufacturing and shipping overhead (both variable and fixed) were allocate to planned production? What was the actual cost per unit of production and shipping?
7. Though numbers given in the cost data can not be contested, I would definitely contest the way total cost has been computed. The item 345 department operates within a large manufacturing facility that churns out number of other products too. Hence judging the profitability of item 345 on the basis of total cost is not practical.
Break even analysis can be used to decide whether to alter the existing product emphasis or not. For example in this case, if we refer last year’s data, we can see that the product C is not economically feasible to manufacture at $2.40 / unit. Following table gives the analysis for checking whether the company can afford to invest in additional “C” capacity.
Assume you have been hired as a managing consultant by a company to offer some advice that will help it make a decision as to whether it should shut down completely or continue its operations. It currently uses 100 workers to produce 6,000 units of output per month (working 20 days / month). The daily wage (per worker) is $70, and the price of the firm's output is $32. The cost of other variable inputs is $2,000 per day. It also tells us that the firm's fixed cost is “high enough” so that the firm's total costs exceed its total revenue. The marginal cost of the last unit is $30.