preview

Studies on Memories

Good Essays

Human beings usually depend on memory to accurately recall or describe the past events that have happened. However, many researchers have shown that human memories can be imperfect and fallible (Lilienfeld et al., 2012). This essay will argue that human memory for the details of past events is not reliably accurate. The evidence for this argument can be seen in two empirical studies which will be reviewed. Schmolck, Buffalo & Squire (2000), found that percentage memory distortions and mistaken recollections after 32 months is higher than 15 months. Lastly, Roediger III, Jacoby, and McDermott (1996) found an extensive misinformation effects occurred in memory recall and the effects increase with repeated testing.
First evidence is study by Schmolck et al. (2000) which is to examine memory changes about the O.J. Simpson trial verdict after 15 months and 32 months of the incident. The IVs for the study is the time taken for the interview of the participants. The IVs has two levels which are the interview were conducted after 15 months and 32 months of the incident. Meanwhile, the DVs for the study is the percentage of memory distortions after 15 and 32 months of the incident. They surveyed 222 undergraduate psychology students. The participants rated several questions and answered a few questions (how they heard the verdict, where were they and what were they doing when they heard the verdict) after 3 days of the verdict was announced. Then, the 222 students were divided into

Get Access