Stylistic Devices in Fahrenheit 451

There are many types of symbolism involved in the story “Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury. There are three major symbolism that i'm going to be talking about that are talked throughout the whole book. The three symbols are The Hound, Fire and lastly The Phoenix. All three of the symbols show a different understanding about them. The hound means government control. Fire means likes control.

Beatty is manipulative, but he is also intelligent. When Beatty visits Montag, he brings up arguments to Montag on how the education system was censored by the government, in order to keep its citizens happy and not cause any revolt. One of them being …. He brings up this argument in page hffh, quote. This further proves that Beatty is intelligent character that proposes ideas to Montag that are true and pushes Montag to think outside his point of view.

Suprisingly, he knows a lot about books. He spends a lot of time quoting from books. Montag and Beatty are foil characters because of their different views as well. He manipulates Montag into going against what he wants to believe in. However, at the same time, makes Montag want more knowledge. Beatty says to Montag, “Each man, the image of every other, then all are happy.” (58). This quote is saying all people need to be made equal. This is a contrast between Montag and Beatty because Montag becomes free and realizes all people should have their own minds. This a strong point tthat describes the differences between Montag and Beatty. Beatty and Montag are both very knowledgeable, but all in all, they have different views that leave one satisfied and the other in

Towards the end of the passage, Montag threatens Beatty with a fire hose, prompting a lengthy dialogue from Beatty. Beatty responds to Montag’s threats with an allusion to Shakespeare, saying, “‘There is no terror, Cassius, in your threats, for I am arm’d so strong in honesty that they pass by me as an idle wind, which I respect not!’ How’s that?” Beatty’s ease and familiarity with Shakespeare confirm that Beatty has definitely read books, and that he is an intelligent man has some notion of what books have held deep within their pages. In this way, Beatty is similar to Montag, he is another book burner that is knowledgeable about literature. What separates the two is that Beatty is simply unable to diverge from societal norms, and his stubbornness takes over and refuses to admit the worth of books. This differs greatly from Montag, who is finally starting to rebel against society. In this same scene, Beatty also taunts Montag when the fire hose is pointed at him, urging Montag to, “Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, pull the trigger.” While this may have just been Beatty egging Montag on, later on Beatty’s lack of resistance seems to suggest that Beatty really didn’t care whether or not he died. Moments before his death, Beatty simply says, “‘Hand it over, Guy,” and then proceeds to smile as he knows he is about to be burnt. Through dialogue, Bradbury is able to reveal information about Beatty’s background and knowledge of books, as well as his

Beatty uses his knowledge to attack Montag after the fireman has made the decision to join the radicals and to oppose the burning of books. Montag returns to the fire station in order to surrender a book, creating the illusion of conforming to Beatty’s expectations. Before Montag has an opportunity to speak Beatty begins to confound him with contradictory statements from

Although Beatty decides to reject what he learned when given the opportunity to read books, Beatty is unhappy with his life as a fireman and persuades Montag to kill him by using pathos as shown through his words and actions. Firstly, Beatty orders Montag to burn Montag’s own house, creating anger and sadness within Montag. Messing with Montag’s emotions makes it a pathos appeal. This action alone does not make Montag kill Beatty, but it does push to that goal. In addition, Beatty continues to irritate Montag by insulting him, saying “It was the act of a silly, damn snob” (Bradbury 118). Even though Montag was acting like a snob, or a stuck-up individual, when he read the “Dover Beach” poem to Mildred and her friends, Beatty calling Montag

Fahrenheit 451 is a book that uses a lot of imagery in order to convey its message written by Ray Bradbury an American author and screenwriter who let himself through his imagination. Theis novel book is set in a futuristice American society where people are not allowed to read books. The story revolves around the main character, Montag, a fireman whose job it is to burn books, and the people that he meets and experiences that challenges him to his societaly beliefs. Fire is one image that is used as something that represents distraction. Sad,unhappy and not adventurous are a way to describe Montag.

Unquestionably, all novels can convey multiple meanings depending on a variety of factors with the most important being the manner in which the audience interprets the author’s words. More importantly, to professionally draw conclusions concerning the message the author demonstrates throughout a text, it is essential to discuss and apply the five literary elements of literature to the text. In greater detail, when a work itself is criticized or evaluated, usually one literary element is focused on to prove an argument pertaining to a novel. To bring the topic into focus, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 possesses many points that could be argued in contradictory ways based upon factual

Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451 presents readers with multiple themes. In the fictional society of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, books are banned and firemen create fires instead of putting them out. Bradbury portrays the society as dystopian. Bradbury crafted the novel to be interpreted intellectually. The characters claim to be happy. However, the reader can conclude otherwise. Bradbury creates a question for the reader to answer: Is ignorance bliss or does the ability to think for oneself create happiness? Bradbury shows the importance of self-reflection, happiness and the ability to think for oneself as well as isolation due to technology, and the importance of nature and animals. In Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury conveys the stories’ themes through characterization and symbols.

Ray Bradbury once stated, “I never consciously place symbolism in my writing. That would be a self-conscious exercise and self-consciousness is defeating to any creative act … During a lifetime, one saves up information which collects itself around centers in the mind; these automatically become symbols on a subliminal level and need only be summoned in the heat of writing.” (The Paris Review). Bradbury’s may not have consciously placed symbolism in Fahrenheit 451, but his use of symbolism throughout the story allows the reader to relate back to their most basic instincts, all while seeing a deeper meaning to what they are really looking at.

Fahrenheit 451, is a book which helps to connect its plot through the authors uses of literary devices. Tone can help to create characterisation, in doing so it helps the reader to get a better grasp of the character and their inner thoughts. It also can, help to create imagery, through the author uses of symbols throughout the book. The theme of Fahrenheit 451 is one can go along with society without knowing their true identity, as shown by the authors tone throughout the book.

hroughout the novel of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, there have been many allusions that connected to alternative literature. fine famous authors like Shakspere, and Sir Phillip Sydney were tied into the story. The Bible and Greek stories were additionally concerned. The result of quoting these works of literature improved the story.

Fahrenheit 451 has been called an ingenious and life changing work of literature. It could not have had this effect on people, however, without the incredibly pivotal part 3 of the novel. This part is what shows the inherent hopeful nature of the writing. Ray Bradbury’s intent when writing Part 3 of Fahrenheit 451 was to show how even a dark and dystopian world like the one in the novel can be reborn into a new and better society, and that even the most hopeless of situations can be fixed. He demonstrates this intent through an analogy about the seasons, similes involving wax dolls, and finally the overarching metaphor of the phoenix.

”(Bradbury 33) Montag responds to that by saying, “He wasn’t insane.” (Bradbury 33) Beatty then states, “Any man’s insane who thinks he can fool the government and us.” (Bradbury 33) Bradbury uses this conversation between Beatty and Montag to help the reader understand how authority in their society thinks. When Montag runs away at the end of the novel, it really shows that he is afraid of being caught.

Well, now I’ve done both.” When it comes to this quote Montag is referring to Beatty and how he always told him that if he had a problem that he should burn it and eventually Beatty became Montag’s problem so he decided to face it by burning him and killing him in the process. Ultimately, Montag killed Beatty because of all the events that led up to the final showdown between the two.