Summaction And Fall Of Enron

In 2000 Enron was the world’s leading corporation in selling natural gas with an estimated worth in sales of around one hundred billion dollars and the company showed only signs of progressing. Within one year the company went completely bankrupt and forty of their top employees were arrested or are in jail awaiting trials. How can a multinational corporation with steadily increasing revenue take such a drastic fall into bankruptcy and how did no one see this coming? In the end Enron knew exactly what was in their future and hid it from the public by allocating their debt and with a loophole in their accounting, it turned out to be one of the biggest cover ups in the stock markets history.

The purpose of this paper is consider three possible rationales for why Enron collapsed—that key individuals were flawed, that the organization was flawed, and that some factors larger than the organization (e.g., a trend toward deregulation) led to Enron’s collapse. In viewing “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” it was clear that all three of these flaws contributed to the demise of Enron, but it was the synergy of their combination that truly let Enron to its ultimate path of destruction.

Enron was a dream come true for a lot of people, but it was also a nightmare waiting to happen for many more. I am going to examine the collapse of Enron from the management perspective. The three examples of Enron behaving badly that I am going to study are the incidents in Valhalla, the electricity trading in California and the conflict of interest between Andy Fastow and his special purpose entities (SPE). These are just a few cases that led to the failure of the "World's Leading Company."

One Merrill Lynch analyst began to question the numbers and profits that were being produced by Enron and eventually he was fired. Enron invested a lot of money with Merrill Lynch and they didn’t want Enron to stop investing so Merrill Lynch got rid of the employee who question Enron, when in reality they should have listened to him. Merrill Lynch’s decision not to listen to him showed other employees that they better keep quiet with their opinions or their jobs would be on the line. If they listened to him they might have lost the deal with Enron, but in the end they lost it anyway and lost millions along with it. Merrill Lynch’s main focus should have been their employees and their investors, not solely Enron. They should have stuck to their code of conduct and followed their values.

Enron Corp. was an American organization based in Houston which had its interest in Natural Gas, Electricity, Communications, Pulp and Paper. It was formed after the federal deregulation of natural gas pipelines, by merging Houston Natural Gas company and InterNorth by Kenneth Lay in 1985. This company grew at a very fast pace, from a pipe line company in the 1980’s to become the world’s largest energy trader. Enron was named ‘America’s Most Innovative Company’ by Fortune for six consecutive years. Before it filed for bankruptcy on Dec 2, 2001, Enron was considered a very big player in the market, which claimed revenues of $111 billion during 2000.

The purpose of this article is analyze the downfall of the Enron Corporation and how the collapse of Enron Corporation consequence affected the United states financial market. Enron Corporation was the seventh largest company in the United States, and had the biggest audit failure. In this Research paper, it describes the reason of Enron Corporation collapse, including details of the internal/ external management, accounting fraud, and conflict of interest. Enron is the largest bankruptcy in America history!

Enron was founded in 1985 by Kenneth Lay and by the mid 90s under the tutelage of Jeff Skilling, it was being touted as a revolutionary company that was destined to change the face of business and the energy industry. However, by 2001 it became clear that Enron’s astronomical growth and sustained profitability was built upon fraudulent grounds. The company was stashing debt but continued to report profits. Employees were taking huge risk and gambling exorbitant amounts and many were outright stealing from the company for their own personal gains. By the end of 2001, Enron’s downfall resulted in the largest corporate bankruptcy in United States history at the time, and more than 20,000 employees were laid off. The company’s fall from grace wasn’t a result of incompetence, instead it was the inevitable consequence of the toxic culture which was incubated and disseminated by Enron’s top management to all other aspects of the company. Enron’s strong culture became a liability because culture defines what is important to the organization and informs employees about how things are meant to be done. As I will demonstrate through various examples of Enron’s questionable business tactics, its potent corporate culture was low on attention to detail while being high on aggressiveness, risk taking and outcome orientation. This combination of factors created the climate for unethical behavior to become a deep-rooted norm within the organization.

The following paper will explain the reason of why Enron as a company failed. It will compare and contrast the contributions of leadership, management and organizational structures to the failure.

The story of Enron’s bankruptcy, an US company that provided products and services related to natural gas, electricity and communications has been one of the most serious cases of unethical practices in the American economy. The company directors in association with their accountants and lawyers created subsidiaries in order to generated false earnings, avoid taxes, inflated assets and hide losses. Finally in 2001 the company lost the credibility in the market and the scandal was exposed affecting thousands of employees and investors. (Tonge, Greer, & Lawton, 2003)

Moreover, we know that ENRON has been buying a big number of ventures that looked promising. We know that ENRON has also been creating off balance sheet entities in order to remove the risk of their financial statements.  Because of market-based accounting explained above, ENRON recorded all time high revenues. The company thus wanted to be involved in other areas. For instance, ENRON was buying or developing an asset – such as a pipeline – and then was expanding through a vertical integration (buying a retail business around that pipeline). This strategy required huge amounts of initial investments and was not going to generate earning or cash flow in the short term. If ENRON elected to present this strategy on its financial statements, it would have placed a big burden on the company’s ratios and credit ratings, and credit ratings investment grade was crucial for ENRON energy trading business. In order to find a solution to this issue, ENRON decided to look for outside investors who would like to make those deals with

Of course, the Enron fiasco did not happen by accident. It was facilitated by a corporate culture that encouraged greed and fraud, as exemplified by the energy traders who extorted California energy consumers. Rather than focus on creating real value, management's only goal was in maintaining the appearance of value, and therefore a rising stock price. This was exacerbated by a fiercely competitive corporate culture that rewarded results at any cost. Some divisions of Enron replaced as much as 15 percent of its work force annually, leaving employees to scramble for any advantage they could find to justify their continued employment. While the internal integrity of the company remained thusly challenged, the façade was the exact opposite. The company leveraged political connections in both the Clinton and Bush administrations,

Enron began to unfold in December 2001 and continues to roll in 2002 is very broad implications for global financial markets were marked by declining stock prices drastically various stock exchanges around the world, from America, Europe, to Asia. Enron, a company that ranks seven of five hundred leading companies in the United States and is the largest energy company in the US went bankrupt with debts left nearly US $ 31.2 billion.

All of the prior represents the business side of the downfall of Enron. That being said, businesses fail all of the time. The reason why Enron Corporation and its executives will always live in infamy is not because the company failed, but how and why the company failed. How, exactly, does a company worth about $70 million collapse in less than a month? It became clear that the company not only had financial problems, but ethical problems that started from the top of the company and trickled down. A key player in these problems was Jeffrey Skilling. He was a man brought to the company by Ken Lay himself. Skilling brought his own accounting concept to the company. It was called mark-to-market accounting. This concept allowed Enron to record potential profits the day a deal was signed. This meant that the company could report whatever they “thought” profits from the deal were going to be and count the number towards actual profits, even if no money actually came in. Mark-to-market accounting granted Enron the power to report major profits to the public, even if they were little or even negative. It became a major way

Most of the world has heard of Enron, the American, mega-energy company that “cooked their books” ( ) and cost their investors billions of dollars in lost earnings and retirement funds. While much of the controversy surrounding the Enron scandal focused on the losses of investors, unethical practices of executives and questionable accounting tactics, there were many others within close proximity to the turmoil. It begs the question- who was really at fault and what has been done to prevent it from happening again?

Unfortunately, scandals like Enron are not isolated incidents and the last decade has offered Americans a disheartening perspective with comparable scandals like that of WorldCom and Tyco, Sunbeam, Global Crossing and many more. Companies have a concrete responsibility not just to their investors but to society as a whole to have practices which deter corporate greed and looting and which actively and effectively work to prevent such things from happening. This