preview

Summary And Symbolism In Alice Walker's Everyday Use

Better Essays

There are usually two sides to every story and Joe Sarnowski proves this in "Destroying To Save: Idealism And Pragmatism In Alice Walker's ‘Everyday Use’". “Everyday Use” is a narration about a single, African American mother raising two, very different daughters. Mama Johnson struggles to understand why each of her daughters view the value of heirloom quilts so differently. Walker uses character development and symbolism to display how something as elementary as a homemade quilt could have very different meanings for each person. While Dee/Wangero, the eldest daughter intends to use the prized quilts as art pieces, Maggie, the youngest will use them for the purpose designated. Although the mother agrees with Maggie, she criticizes with the …show more content…

Sarnowski states that, “Dee has abandoned the use of her given name in exchange for the African name Wangero. She has left her birth home, ragged and impoverished, pursued a college degree and embraced the Black Pride movement Her new found appreciation is displayed from the way she dresses up to the way she talks (274). “A dress down to the ground…so loud it hurts my eyes…yellows and oranges enough to throw back the light of the sun…Earrings, too, gold and hanging down to her shoulders. Bracelets dangling and making noises” (Walker 493). Dee/Wangero sees no monetary value in the things that were created by her ancestors, nor does she interpret the difference between preserving and possessing them (279). She lives in a world of make-believe, one that is complete only from her view point (Baker 176). She marvels over ordinary household items that she grew up around, but now aspires to turn them into display pieces (274). Most importantly the quilts that were hand-stitched by her mother, grandma and sister. Even though she declares that they are priceless (Walker 496), she provides no compensation for them, or nothing to replace them (276). Sarnowski asserts that her, “belief that the worth of these heirlooms cannot be measured by money reflects an idealization of both her African and African-American heritage” (275). In Susan Farrell’s “Fight vs. Flight: A Re-evaluation of Dee in Alice Walker’s ‘Everyday Use’,” she states, “While Dee is …show more content…

As Sam Whitsitt explains, “The quilt represents the female’s side of history and tradition. It binds a culture to its past and the culture’s past to the present and future (445). Sarnowski shows how Mrs. Johnson’s connection to the quilts tells us about her link to her past. She is able to draw the lineage of each slice of material stitched into the quilt (284). Sarnowski’s symbolism of a quilt piece stitched together being parallel to a collection of family members bound together is supported in this passage,” The quilts remain appropriate for “everyday use” so long as the art of their manufacture remains alive.” (Cowart 179). However, Sarnowski maintains that heritage, for Mrs. Johnson and Maggie, is the human action of connecting the pieces together and he further says that the routine of not utilizing them for the purposes intended would be removing them from the living tradition. Even though they are made from fabrics with no monetary value, they are no longer available to recycle and use to create more quilts, which would carry their heritage (284). Sarnowski defines the quilts’ symbolism for Dee/Wangero as not being of any less value if she displays them rather than they be destroyed by everyday use. Sarnowski states that the more society views the quilts as art pieces, the more they are worth in value and/or status to the owner (285). Sarnowski offers that Dee/Wangero has no greater

Get Access